A reporter just phoned up, asking for my comments on popular Bollywood star Shahrukh Khan as one of the 77 new Malacca Datuks on the occasion of the 70th birthday of the Malacca Yang di-Pertua Negeri Tun Mohd Khalil Yaakob.
I was astounded and I said so. Are there no Malaysian film stars, artists or sports-people who have greater title to be honoured and encouraged as compared to Shahrukh?
I don’t think the reason that has been given for making Shahrukh Khan a Malacca Datuk would impress or convince many – that the Bollywood actor-dancer had “contributed to our tourism industry when he acted in a movie filmed in Malaysia”.
On this basis, shouldn’t Hollywood stars Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta Jones be honoured for their 1999 film “Entrapment” which first promoted the Twin Towers to the world shortly after they were completed when the Twin Towers was used as the film location – although the film was subsequently accused of “distortion” when images of Malacca slums were spliced with shots of the 1,482ft-high skyscrapers.
Or the 2000 Academy Award-nominee film “Anna and the King” (a remake of “The King and I”) starring Jodie Foster and Chow Yun-Fat (and our Patrick Teoh) which was mostly shot in Ipoh?
Or are Taiwan Gold Horse Award 2005/6 Best Leading Actor Aaron Kwok to be similarly awarded for his 2006 film “After This Our Exile” and world-famous director Ang Lee for his 2007 film “Lust, Caution”. starring Tony Leung & Tang Wei, as both promoted Malaysia as having been filmed or used footages from Perak?
What about other foreign stars in films which had used Malaysia for their location?

#1 by OCSunny on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:11 pm
Datuk or whatever titles doesn’t seem to have much value, crdibility or honour being awarded with one as even Shahrukh Khan can get one. What are the criterias??
#2 by ctc537 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:23 pm
I think the person who decided the award is a fan of Shahrukh Khan and Hindi films. Spur-of-the-moment decision, pure and simple.
#3 by max2811 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:33 pm
Maybe some big shot’s wife fell in love with him. It always happens in Msia. Some VIP’s wife like a certain thing, shoe polish would quickly act to make everybody like the same thing.
A ‘Datuk or Dato’, Tan Sri or Tun are worth 2 sen to me. No big deal. Who cares? Why the fuss, Mr Lim? No issues to write about?
Please tell me why the price of petrol is not lowerer?
#4 by max2811 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:34 pm
lowered
#5 by waterfrontcoolie on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:40 pm
YB., I have realized long AGO that our Gomen and those involved with them are very good at organizing events that do not require back-up services or maintenance! In this case, giving Datukship to a popular Bollywood star is one of them. I wonder if the star is ever bothered.
In fact I would like to propose that the Gomen have a MINISTER of OPENING CEREMONY and EVENTS in its Cabinet, so that other people will do the clean-up later! This has been our specialty; grand opening and then close shop!! Hence so much importance has been given to all these birthday ceremonies through out the year!as if the country has nothing esle to keep itself occupied with.
#6 by shadow on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:44 pm
RUBBISH!
#7 by pselvams on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:45 pm
To add on to max2811, please let the public know what is happening to the promise of allowing the price of fuel to be revised based on world price movements. Somebody on top please advise or are they busy with the current party affairs or meetings and want us the public to hold on to something till everything is worked out accordingly.
#8 by pselvams on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:51 pm
Fans of bollywood, good news is that there is going to be lots and lots of handsome and pretty faces in Malaysia soon to celebrate their birthdays and anniversaries at the expense of our gonement. New policy is first celebrate then look for the problems the RAKYAT faces daily. Offcourse probems will always be there, so lets celebrate first.
#9 by ramth on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:53 pm
i think the reason should be “that the bollywood actor is related to parameswara(iskandar shah)
#10 by counsel888 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 1:55 pm
It is a question of choice and nomnations that go before the committee that recommends to the ruler the award of that Datukship. It is not necessarily one that is based on the fact that someone filmed at a particular location alone or is part of an industry in which others have participated who are not nominated.
It may well also be a reflection as to how important India is to Malaysia’s economy and the ties that are developing in specific areas such as tourism. Sharuk Khan’s impact on the industry cannot be underestimated. Hollywood is not as big nor has it been as big and influential as Hollywood althouth they do portray that image succcessfully in the west.
BTW Sharuk Khan is more popular in Europe today and in many more parts of the world including the USA than Catherine Zeta Jones or Sean Connery. Suprised? don’t be.
The Indian film industry is not simply the largest in the world but also one with a wider appeal, influence and presence in many more countries than the one we consider better or more popular, Hollywood.
The former Soviet Union taught (and still does) Indian literature and poetry and history including the Bhagvad Gita and Tagore in areas as remote as Ulan Baatar in Mongolia, Taskent in Khazakstan and Sofiain Bulgaria and yees in China as well.
In other places like Ndgameena in Chad and Daar es Saalam in Tanzania they know Zeenat Aaman and the Kapoor brothers better than they know John Lennon, Spencer Tracey or Sean Connery.
So if it offends or creates a stir maybe you should nominate these others into a category that Sharuk Khan was nominated in and show the reasons and impact their contribution to that category has been.
#11 by whattheheckman on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:23 pm
To: RAMTH.
Historically Parameswara never converted to Islam. It was somebody else. Parameswara from the Sri Vijaya Kingdom has linage to Raja Raja Solan. As we all know India controlled Hindunesia (Indonesia), Hindu-China (Indo China) and beyond. Much later we see the arrival of Hang Tuah and comrades from the Hung Li Po era to give protection to the malacca sultanate. I can email you the article.
To: MAX281,
You are absolutely right on the Awards.
#12 by bolehlandor on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:24 pm
At the rate bolehland political leaders is going anonymous people with Datukship or some other honorific MY titles will outnumber those who do not hold such titles. Trust these stupid fools to insult the MY honorofic titles.
Now aren’t you glad that you are just a plain Mr or Ms?
#13 by Emily Pratt on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:25 pm
Datukships in M’sia are dime a dozen. It has lost its intrinsic values. Yawn…
#14 by La Pax on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:28 pm
next election bn can make use of SK to get votes
#15 by madmix on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:29 pm
But Lim Guan Eng also give dato to a certain badminton player. Maybe PR states should set an example by being very very stingy with the dato thing and give only one or two per state per year. Also create a new class of dato to underline its higher value and prestige. Maybe Dato Seri Rakyat?
#16 by azisirikit on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:30 pm
My name is Aziz. Born in Melaka. My hometown Alor Gajah. What is that Khalil doing! Idiot! And why that Mamak M send him to Melaka (to be YDP) instead he should stay put in Pahang!
#17 by La Pax on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:34 pm
The misuse of ISA and mishonour of Datukship are no different now..
#18 by bentoh on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:34 pm
# madmix Says:
Today at 14: 29.12 (1 minute ago)
But Lim Guan Eng also give dato to a certain badminton player. Maybe PR states should set an example by being very very stingy with the dato thing and give only one or two per state per year. Also create a new class of dato to underline its higher value and prestige. Maybe Dato Seri Rakyat?
==================================================
The difference is… The badminton player is a Malaysian and a Penangite. Also, the badminton player once brought himself (and the name of Malaysia) to the first in world ranking, though now edged by China player Lin Dan, he still managed to snatch several championship from the super series, and scored a silver in the concluded Beijing Olympic games…
Now, tell me more about Sharukh Khan, whether he is a Malaysian or Malaccan, or whether what he did actually brought Malaysia to fame internationally… ;)
#19 by CJ 27 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:49 pm
Datuk means Latuk la. Tak tahu la apa itu. Chong Wei pun datuk, Misbun pun datuk, Mamak Malik who swam across a river few years ago also Datuk. Ask ourselves what had they contributed to the country compare to LGE who spent 2 years in jail just to protect an innocent girl.
Don’t blame Shah Rukh Khan, I’m sure he did not ask for the title.
So stop the fuss, let us be more caution of what is happening in this global financial crisis. Singapore confirmed is in recession. Better watch out Malaysia.
#20 by wanderer on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 2:55 pm
YB;
You are a son of Malacca and with your proven track records serving this nation are indisputable, why no Datukship for you?!!
#21 by happyhappy on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:14 pm
everyone want to complaint`if give it to you/you also want…
stop being a silly … here….
#22 by m.hwang on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:14 pm
A pathetic attempt to appease Hindraf symphatisers!
#23 by raven77 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:26 pm
Orang Melaka sikit pun takde malu ka……the peon and the bankrupt sudah kasi jual Melaka habis habis….MALU MALU MALU !!!!
#24 by Cinapek on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:31 pm
YB, don’t waste your breadth and your energy on nondescript matter such as these.
Let them demean the value of the datukship they are conferrng. If in their eyes every tom, dick and harry is worthy, so be it. It is not surprising anyway because Malacca was also the same state that awarded the huge number of datukships recently. So, what is one more? There will come a day when every other person in Malacca will be a Datuk.
#25 by Tonberry on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:31 pm
Altantuya should be given the Tunship bcoz she promoted Malaysia to the Mongolians.
#26 by abunsui on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:33 pm
Whether you DATUK or not, we prefer to respect or Not respect the “REAL YOU”.
Example Only :
If a “criminal” or “person with RM” is conferred with Datukship and a person like??????… let say….er, er er so difficult to find one : Nik Aziz Zik Mat not being conferred the Datukship – who are you going to respect??
So don’t respect the “Datukship” per se.
#27 by kftang on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:42 pm
77 Datuks made in a year from a small state with the stroke of a pen. There are 13 states and a Wilayah Persekutuan having the prilvilege to give awards. So just count how many Datukships will be created in a calendar year? In 10 years? As a popular saying goes, just throw a stone among the crowd and you are most likely to hit a Datuk! The award of a Datukship should be limited, deserving and controlled so that it has the respect and value that it deserves.
#28 by kisfiu on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:45 pm
Used to be Datuks are a dime a dozen … that was not so long ago from Pahang. Now, ali & co. are doing the one-upmanship in Melaka where Datuks are a dime a baker dozen !
#29 by BoycottLocalPapers on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:46 pm
I have no problem with Datukship for Shahrukh Khan. But if Shahrukh Khan is conferred Datuk, then Jackie Chan should be honored with Tunship. Jackie Chan had contributed a lot to this country. :D
#30 by drngsc on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:47 pm
The Malacca state gomen has lost its direction. Just tells us that datukship is a joke. We need a change.
#31 by LALILOo on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:51 pm
The datukship is so worthless that SR Khan will not be coming to Melacca to receive it. He’ll collect it when he is free.
#32 by Raitman on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 4:01 pm
What about Jenna Jameson for a Datukship? She never contributed anything useful for Malaysia but since some Malaysians like her , why not honour her? :D
#33 by owlz on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:32 pm
Mamak!!! Mamak!!! Mamak!!!
.
.
.
WIKIPEDIA
————————————–
.
Mamak is a term (derived from a Tamil word meaning uncle) used
in Malaysia to describe the Tamil Muslim community and culture.
Most Indian Muslims consider this term to be pejorative.
.
.
A mamak stall, also referred to as mapley, is a type of food
establishment which serves mamak food. In Malaysia, the term
mamak refers to Indian Muslims, who generally own and operate
them.
————————————————————
.
p/s: Even Im a Malay and a muslim, I think even Kit Siang
deserve that Datukship. Shah Rukh??? EERRGGHH!!!Wut the
FISH??? Wut the FISH??? Wut the Fish???
.
And aaa… Mahathir is a mamak also… UMNO? What about UMNO??
#34 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:37 pm
On Nov 14 2003, Rais Yatim said it was common knowledge that datukships (in some states) could be bought, a state of affairs even the PM described as ‘very embarrassing’. Many businessmen pay for datukship not only for themselves but your companies’ runners so that they would find it harder to resign!
Intermediaries had also been charged in court with cheating businessmen of payment meant to get the latter’s an award that somehow failed to be awarded.
We also know of the arrests of some datuks for criminal activities and corporate fraud, in some cases their title withdrawn. People below 30s also had been awarded datukship raising question as to what they could have possibly contributed to society.
Now a Bollywood Star (not even a national) for his contribution to the entertainment industry at international level when he acted in a movie filmed in Malaysia.
So why not Sean Connery, Catherine Zeta Jones, Jodie Foster and Chow Yun-Fat? Maybe unlike Shah Rukh Khan they are really not interested in receiving such a title.
The conferral of titles and honorifics is an integral part of the feudal political culture and patronage system that is alive and kicking here – whatever the motives, laudable or demeaning behind such conferrals.
Isn’t it a right on the part of our feudal lords to bestow on whom they are pleased with – so why should we ordinary rakyat complain?
If they want to “sendiri shiok” it is no beef on my back.
There is sense in what Cinapek posted Today at 15: 31.54 , “YB, don’t waste your breadth and your energy on nondescript matter such as these. Let them demean the value of the datukship they are conferring. If in their eyes every tom, dick and harry is worthy, so be it”.
Even Tun Dr Mahathir mentioned that one of the problems with titles in Malaysia is the numbers given out. He stated in an interview “Personally, I feel if you want to give value to anything, it must be limited…if you produce a million Ferrari cars, nobody will care about buying a Ferrari.”
Maybe our YB is a wee worried just in case he is being conferred a title, as rumoured….
Meanwhile the real ‘knight’ of Malaysian society – Glocal Malay – is presently in Kamunting having a sojourn in KL to defend a sedition charge brought by the State. The emblem of true honour is having entered the gates of Kamunting in defence of the Malaysian Cause!
#35 by owlz on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:38 pm
OOWWHHH!!! One more thing, is it true that Shah Rukh
is a muslim? Anyone can answer me? I just heard a news,
dunno whether its true or not. But usually the Indians
that using the the Khan or Shah or Rukh or Salman or
Aamir, or Abdul or Mohd and else, usually they are muslims.
#36 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:43 pm
At least this much you have to give credit to PM’s SIL Khairy Jamaluddin presently in a battle for the Umno Youth chief’s post with Mukhriz Mahathir. He is not a Datuk. You think he can’t get meh if he wanted? Ghafar Baba & Daim also shunned honorifics until they were ultimately conferred Tunship, which in today’s feudal society, is the coveted title.
#37 by pizi87 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:59 pm
stupid malacca govornment. SRK has done nothing for melaka or malaysia lah except what, belly dancing on TV!
#38 by taiking1 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 6:46 pm
I suggest eveyone here be made a dato or datuk or dato’ or oh whatever for having contributed to this blogsite. And oh one more thing. Because I love you all. You guys are just fantastic.
#39 by shortie kiasu on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 6:53 pm
It is the perogative of the Rulers or the Governors in Malaysia to give out their own sets of titles like datuk to any one. They can give it to a dumb for all we care.
#40 by tc on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 7:13 pm
Can anyone tell me how many datos,datuks,dato seri,datuk paduka,datok wira or whatever datos are there in Malaysia today?
I sincerely hope LKS,LGE and the other PR MPs will not accept anymore datukship,otherwise what is the difference the good,the bad and the ugly.
#41 by kftang on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:05 pm
In reply to tc’s query on the total number of the various types of Datukships around in the country today, just log on to the website of the birthday honours’ list of Malaysia’s rulers and governors for every year, then he can tabulate the statistics and give us an answer. Please do us a favour. Thank you and good luck!
#42 by wtf2 on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:12 pm
simply a cheap trick to earn indian votes and heart. If Sharukh is smart he should not appear to collect his award. Not worth his while to get embroiled in UMNO politiks.
#43 by yhsiew on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:15 pm
Kit,
There is no free lunch in this world. Obviously a deal has been sealed in Shahrukh Khan’s case. Anyhow, it is not for us to pry into somebody’s private affair.
#44 by whattheheckman on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:19 pm
Shah Rukh Khan is a muslim but his wife is a hindu. In india this is common and does not lead to any controversy.
#45 by parajurit sarawak on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:39 pm
Well done Melaka. Sarawak Datuship is for crony and RM only. They ignored Parajurit. Ask TM, how many general are made Datuship? Sorry for SP holders like Sarawak Warrior Kanang anak Langkau.
#46 by rider on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 8:48 pm
Since Sharukh Khan did not come to collect his datukship , I Rider Khan am offering myself as the head of a delegation to deliver the stuff to the Mumbhai Khan on behalf of the Malacca state and also reach out to Sarath Kumar who shot a tamil movie ’1974′ in KL, S.V.Sekhar who shot ‘Wonderful Malaysia’ and many others before them since they shouldn’t be forgotten too.. after all to lead a delegation involves taxpayers money what? and I haven’t seen Mumbhai in a long while, please? How about Genghiz Khan? did he conquer Malaya? he could have provided some genes what?
#47 by Jimm on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:02 pm
We sell anything to anyone under the skies.
Malaysia Boleh ……
#48 by cemerlang on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:29 pm
cute. As if Malaysians are not good enough for the titles. The truth is many Malaysians are boleh and very good but because of political manipulation, they will not receive any. Instead of exalting fellow Malaysians, foreigners are exalted first or is it that their money is being exalted ? Thank you for filming and for bringing in the revenue for Malaysia. If Datuk and other titles is so great, why is there a tsunami ? Poor Malaysia. Always having to be the copy cat. Just because England gives away ” Sir “, so she has to give away her titles. This tells you all that Malaysia is still not really, truely, genuinely independent.
Shahrukh Khan is undoubtedly very talented and he should go to Hollywood like our Datuk Michelle Yeoh. Actually Datuk can be subjected to ISA. Therefore whether one has a title or not, the most important thing is Malaysians know what you are up to. Oh ! Don’t forget. God knows about you too.
#49 by kevchua on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:47 pm
In my blog, I wrote something about awarding an award and I’m still very very VERY sore that the government is still practising wastage by giving awards to undeserving people. Shahrukh Khan DOES NOT DESERVE to be honoured with a Datukship though he is an internationally acclaimed artiste and though he has done his stints in Malaysia.
My god, whoever included his name on the award list should be fired from office. I wonder why my beloved TYT didn’t bother to strike Shahrukh’s name off the list. Rhetorical question. You know the answer.
http://cubs-roar.blogspot.com/2008/07/awarding-award.html
#50 by CSKUEH on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:48 pm
Having any title or not such as datuk is secondary, the most important is our attitude towards others and how we lead our life.
“Don’t do anything from selfish ambition or from a cheap desire to boast, but be humble towards one another, always considering others better than yourselves.And look out for one another’s interest not just for your own (Philippians 2:3-4)”. This should be our legacy.