In his press statement to announce his decision to step down as Prime Minister next March, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi spoke of the initiatives to “regain our country’s competitiveness” which are “necessary to enable our nation and our society to face the challenges that the world has in store for us”.
But in actual fact, under his five-year premiership, one domino after another of our national and international competitiveness has been collapsing one after another.
Two weeks ago, one such falling domino was Malaysia’s ranking on the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2008 which plunged to No. 47 placing, a fall of ten places from No. 37 in 2007.
Another domino has collapsed today when it is revealed that for the second consecutive year, Malaysia has fallen completely out of THES-QS 2008 World Top 200 Universities – further testimony of the country’s deteriorating competitiveness.
Two years ago, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and Universiti Malaya (UM) were listed at the tail-end of the Top 200 in the THES-QS 2006 ranking, and I had repeatedly warned both in and out of Parliament that Malaysia risked being pushed out of the 200 Top Universities ranking unless there was the political will to check brain-drain and restore meritocracy and excellence to Malaysian academia.
It gives me no satisfaction but extreme sadness to see my dire prediction come true – in two consecutive years in succession.
UKM was ranked 185th in 2006, the only time it appeared in the THES-QS chart.
UM, once the nation’s premier university, has a sorry tale of continuous decline. It was ranked among the world’s top 100 universities in 2004 at 89th position, fell to 169th in 2005 and 192nd placing in 2006.
Have Malaysian universities fallen into the “black hole” of international university competitiveness stakes, unable to prove their academic quality, excellence and worth in the international arena?
At the University of Malaya’s centennial celebrations in June 2005, Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak threw the challenge to University of Malaya to raise its then 89th position among the world’s top 100 universities in THES ranking to 50 by the year 2020.
Instead of accepting Najib’s challenge with incremental improvement of its THES ranking, the premier university went into a free fall for two years followed by completely disappearing from the Top 200 Universities ranking in the past two years.
Clearly, Najib and government leaders did not realize or know that the rot in academic excellence and quality of the nation’s premier university had become so deep and septic that far from being able to become the World’s Top 50 Universities, it was to plunge completely out of the Top 200 Universities chart in the past two years.
After he became Prime Minister, Abdullah called for a “education revolution” to achieve world-class universities in Malaysia.
This is another dismal failure of the Abdullah premiership as totally lacking was the political will to carry out such an “education revolution” to liberate our universities from the culture of mediocrity and free lecturers and students from the fetters strangling academic freedom and student idealism.
Malaysians are not asking our public universities to scale new heights never achieved before – but to restore the academic eminence, standards, excellence and quality which University of Malaya had enjoyed in the sixties and even the seventies.
If Australia can have seven universities among the top 100 Universities, Japan four, Hong Kong three, Singapore two, China two and South Korea two, why can’t Malaysia have at least one or two among the Top 100?
National University of Singapore is ranked No. 30, while Nanyang Technological University of Singapore No. 77. What must be more mortifying is Thailand’s Chulalongkorn University is ranked No. 166.
When will Malaysia’s leaders wake up from the slumber and realise that Malaysia has been losing out in the competitiveness stakes and risk being relegated to the “stragglers” instead of the “achievers” in the global society?
If Abdullah’s call for an education revolution is not to end up as another empty slogan, the government must confront and resolve the continuing crisis of higher education standards by elevating meritocracy as the primary criteria for all public universities – from appointment and promotion of academicians to university student intake.
There should be an immediate end to the divisive and fraudulent system of meritocracy for student intake by introducing only one common university entrance examination, whether it be STPM or matriculation.
Furthermore, Malaysian universities should give top priority to academic excellence which should not be compromised by non-academic considerations.
It is most ridiculous for instance that University of Malaya, unranked, refuses to recognize the degrees of Beijing University, ranked No. 50 Tsing Hua University ranked No. 56 in THES 2008 Ranking of the world’s Top 200 universities.

#1 by veddy.lum74 on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 8:59 am
so,what is the point of getting into local Us so desperately for our children?
if our domestic graduates were to work in MNCs,i think probably their fixed-salary is equivalent to rm1 to one thousand!
#2 by Swordsman on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 9:04 am
Oops… “correction action” should read “corrective action”.
#3 by twistedmind on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 10:00 am
Is UITM going to hold a mega protest on all its campuses and insist that the people behind “THES-QS 2008 World Top 200″ retract their rankings and apologize to UITM?
Are they?
#4 by elaineganmaclaine on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 11:34 am
Sigh!! Another expected fall!
I hope this is the last!
#5 by cinaindiamelayubersatu on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 11:39 am
1. “the reason we did not do well in the last election was not because of the leadership but because we did not fulfill the promises of 2004″ KJ abstract from I Am Not To Blame For PM’s Exit The Star 10.10.08. kenyataan bodoh ! why the leaders did not fulfill their promises are because there are none good leader from an existing corrupted leadership system ! if such a remark came from oxford grad what do you expect from uitm grad ?
2. aiya like the ahmad ismail remark la..senang cakap tak payah dari hati ke otak kemudian ke mulut. terus dari mulut kalau tak dari dubur
3. don worry la…uitm tak ke mana…depa tu institut aje
4. kalau aka ada duit, kalau dolla bagi duit sikit kat aku akan hantar anak aku ke luar negara macam najib macam hisham…apa kelas uitm
#6 by alancheah on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 11:48 am
This country really needs many GOOD leaders
to make many dramatic changes, so that we
can only have HOPE!
God Bless.
#7 by cinaindiamelayubersatu on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 4:47 pm
menteri pelajaran dan menteri pendidikan tinggi seharusnya bukan dari kalangan orang politik…macam hisham tu tak logik…anak orang lain dijadikan bahan kajian tapi anak dia ntah di mana ya? mana sekolah anak dia? bila belajar kat luar negeri balik jadi orang besar kata tanah ni bapak aku punya…
#8 by cemerlang on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 9:49 pm
The politicians in charge of education should look into this matter seriously. Are you satisfied with records that look real good ? All students get A + + + . Or somehow at the back of your mind, you wonder if this is purposely done to please you ? It is all about you, the politicians and if it is all about you, then it is nothing about the rest; the teaching staff and the students. If you feel so proud with the good records and you do not have the slightest suspicion, then there is something very wrong with you. If only you have come down and see for yourself what is the real thing going on. Spot check. Can you really ignore it when people tell you that the student is not bright but somehow can enter university ? Can you block your 5 senses if people tell you that another student help another student to do his assignment ? A teaching staff is very respectable no doubt, but if he allows any hanky panky to occur, then he is contributing to the destruction of the country. An education revolution is not about getting all the students into universities. How intelligent can they be if they play internet games more than reading academic or good books ? How intelligent can they be if they prefer to be like the most popular singer instead of spending time studying ? In many ways, intelligence is linked to gathering more and more knowledge. Sport makes one healthy but not necessarily intelligent. Co-curriculum makes one sociable but not necessarily intelligent. So if you want an intelligent population, you have to make sure that the students are interested in absorbing knowledge. All sorts of knowledge and not just the one which he has to pass in.
#9 by alaneth on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 11:50 pm
If we rank world universities only in 1 subject – Political Science, we will definately rank top 10…..
#10 by pulau_sibu on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:10 am
Recently there is a guy who was made the big post at UTM with the news that he is the youngest person appointed to the post (I forgot whatever is the post and his name). Is this the best person around for the post? He is a great researcher, but if you go to America, the universities must be flooded with professors having better accomplishments like him.
Boleh has to think of a way to attract the big guns to come. Hong Kong and Taiwan are doing it and their universities started to pop up in the ranking. In boleh, people care about the title only, like Prof. Datuk Dr…… that made no sense at all to the academic standard and ranking. Unless THES will add in an other criteria, number of Datuk Professors….
Have boleh universities put down in writing how are they going to attain a better ranking or to become a better university? Ask the vice chancellor to show it to the public. If it is not achieved, then the person has to quit in the specified years.
#11 by normandy on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 9:12 am
Yes, lots of lecturers in the local universities are of very low-class quality. I am not sure about other universities (which readers could write in to spill the beans) but I was informed that in UPSI, lecturers were promoted to Associate Prof. and Professor easily without any substantial international publications. More shockingly, I was told that one lady (a senior lecturer) got a conditional offer for an Ass Prof; the condition is that is she publishes one journal article (since she has no journal publication at all)! Many of my colleagues say that they are not applying to UPSI to undergo a PhD programme because the supervision there is of substandard. Imagine if you, as an experienced teacher, would want to do a PhD in education, let’s say science education, you will end up being supervised by a lecturer who has no experience in education. He/she does not even have a teaching qualification, let alone school-based experience. No wonder the UPSI graduates are equally substandard because their practicum was supervised by lecturers who do not even have a Diploma of Education and have never taught in schools!!!!
#12 by Kasim Amat on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 12:57 pm
The THES-QS University ranking system is a flawed system itself that it measures universities based on certain criteria which is totally biased and is very unfavourable to Malaysia Universities. We should not pay too much attention to this flawed ranking system. If we adapt to the criteria that purely aim for the sake of getting our universities to get a higher ranking and forget about the basic fundamentals of the education system in Malaysia, then the whole educational landscape of the country may be misshaped which will eventually results in social instability. The world will finally know that Malaysia Universities are among the best in the world. My son is a graduate of University of Malaya and he took less than 1 week to get his first job with an International Investment Bank in KL. Beside that, he also has several offers from Maybank, Ambank and other big names. I admit that his English may not be as fluent but in Malaysia he does not have to worry that he could not find a decent job.
As a Malaysian we should not downplay the standard of our own universities. We should also not compare ours with the other countries’ because Malaysia’s situation is unique and different from other countries.
#13 by Isamu on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:00 pm
I agree that a degree is not a pre-requisite to success but without good education, it’s a long shot and your only other option is to work hard and work smart.
I agree that some successful entrepreneurs and tycoons do not have a degree, much less formal education but if you observe the history of human civilisation, good education has changed its role in society from being a privilege to a basic right.
I agree that one’s command of the English language do not have to be that of the BBC’s (perfect or near perfect level) to be successful but let’s get real, most Malaysians (regardless of status; graduate or not, local or foreign, race) don’t even have a good enough grasp of it.
I agree that the conditions in Malaysia are different and that we should not downplay our own universities but even if the rating system/criteria are indeed biased, you will only see British universities at the top of the list. In addition, all universities around the world were rated using the same set of criteria and that includes NUS Singapore, NTU Singapore, Chulalongkorn Thailand, Beijing China, Tsing Hua China & etc. These Asian universities are rated at least 50 places on top of the best placed Malaysian university. A really biased system knocks you down 10 or 20 places, not 50 or more. Reality and truth from competitive benchmarking hurts.
#14 by Isamu on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 3:20 pm
Uncle Lim,
BTW, although Chulalongkorn is seldom heard of, it is actually the most prestigious university in Thailand. It is also the oldest (91 years old, people in Kedah, Perlis & etc were still busy fighting the Siamese occupiers at that time).
Quality of education is reputed to be of a very high standard as it’s the focal point of Thailand’s top talents.
It’s lack of fame in Malaysia could be due to Malaysians’ fixation on Singaporean universities and also could be due to the fact that the medium of delivery is in Thai.
#15 by LBJ on Saturday, 11 October 2008 - 5:29 pm
There is no point arguing whether our universities are good or no good. As a country, we need to decide and that means politicans of all grades and citizens, whether we want to have quality universities in this country
If we all decide that that is what the country need, then put resources and policies to get what we want. Even of we have to implement merit selection and promotion, and attract renown professors to our shore.
If we decide that we need quantity university education, then by all means do so. Reduce public expenditure and provide tax break for parents to send their children, if they want a world class eduction. Forget about going to world class status. Let us be happy about being mediocre.
#16 by pulau_sibu on Sunday, 12 October 2008 - 7:19 am
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Head, Prof Ir Dr Mohd Sapuan Salit, won a gold medal in the technology category at the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISESCO Science Prize) 2008 in Baku, Azerbaijan, recently.
According to a statement from UPM here today, Prof Mohd Sapuan’s research in the design and manufacture of polymer composite products won him a cash prize of US$5,000.— BERNAMA
#17 by spirit_up_high_above_the_sky on Monday, 13 October 2008 - 9:43 am
Currently I am a first year student study at NUS. Before this, I had done my UPSR(7A),PMR(8A),SPM(11A),STPM(3A,1A-) in Malaysia. I think my result is considered quite not bad in Malaysia. But i now having a hard time study in Singapore. i just had my midterm test. Even though i passed every paper, all my result were below average mark . How the average mark will be? It is about 75% of the paper. It is not that i never study, skip lecture or anything. I had never be this hardworking before. Is it something wrong with me? No, not really. There are a lot of Malaysian study in NUS too. most of us, past STPM student, found that our level is very low compare to the other countries student, especially those from China. Ironically, Malaysian students are the oldest compare to the rest. I really that hope Malaysia government can do something to improve the quality of education. It is no use always saying how good Malaysian are and only if it is true. Perhaps you all never notice, NUS rank at 30th in the top 200 university.