Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s premiership de facto ended yesterday, September 26, 2008 – 54 months after scoring the most stunning landslide electoral victory for any Prime Minister in the nation’s 51-year history.
How far and how fast Abdullah has fallen!
All the Umno heavyweights are now engaged in a marionette play – how to plunge the dagger into Abdullah’s back without blood being seen to be drawn or better still even camouflaging from the Malaysian public the act of dagger-stabbing altogether.
Although Abdullah claimed that it would be his decision, “whether to contest or not” the post of Umno President, there could be no doubt that if Abdullah departs from the script and fails to announce by before October 9 that he would not be offering himself as a candidate as Umno President, the marionette play would be abandoned and the dagger-stabbing would be a very public and bloody one.
Even the sweet-sounding praises by Umno leaders yesterday over the scuttling of Abdullah’s original mid-2010 power-transition plan and the postponement of the Umno general assembly from December to March next year sounded rather ominous if Abdullah ignores the unmistakable signal that he should not dilly-dally any more in making his exit.
For instance, when asked whether he was satisfied with the outcome of the Umno Supreme Council emergency meeting yesterday although there was no clearcut indication of an exist date, the most hawkish of the Umno leaders against Abdullah, Tan Sri Muhyidddin Yassin, commented: “I think it is good enough. You need to have trust. There must be a certain element of trust in whatever decision the leadership Is making today.”
Abdullah must be aware that he would be regarded as lacking “a certain element of trust” if he failed to announce that he would not be offering his candidacy for Umno President by the Oct. 9 deadline.
In the circumstances, Abdullah has three options before him:
• Announce before the October 9 deadline his intention to contest for the post of Umno President, retaining the initiative in his hands as to his own timeline to effect the power transition;
• Announce that he would not be contesting for the Umno President in the Umno party election in March, which also mark the end of his premiership; and
• Announce his retirement as Prime Minister by Oct. 9.
In the first option, Abdullah would be fighting for his political life as he would have to prove first that he is capable of winning 58 or one-third of the Umno division nominations for the post of Umno President.
This may be a very tall order and he must be prepared to suffer the ignominy of an incumbent Prime Minister and Umno President who could not secure adequate nominations to contest for the post of Umno President.
In the second option, Abdullah would be a lame-duck Prime Minister for six months.
Apart from the third option of immediate retirement as Prime Minister, is there a fourth option open to Abdullah?

#1 by bclee on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 10:38 am
Pah Lah please free all ISA detainees before u step down,leave a good name atleast the most u can do
FREE RPK ABOLISH ISA
FREE RPK ABOLISH ISA
FREE RPK ABOLISH ISA
do it now no more dely
#2 by Lim Koo on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 10:40 am
Typo error — Yam Chi Kwong
#3 by pulau_sibu on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 10:49 am
What will we see next about Abdullah-Najix’s struggle for power?
Abdullah’s camp should tell the public all he knows about najix, especially if what Raja Petra wrote were true. Or release Raja immediately such that he can continue to post! When the irrelevance of Najix as prime minister is clear, Abdullah has a slight chance of clinging to power for slightly longer.
#4 by katdog on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:10 am
Isn’t it highly convenient for Najib that his public enemy number 1, RPK, has now been served with a 2 year ISA detention, supposedly by Abdullah?
Most likely Abdullah is nothing more than a puppet and is being used as a front by the ‘gang’ behind the scenes to stamp down on any dissent before they take over.
#5 by justiciary on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:12 am
YB LKS,in view of the deteriorating status of public safety due to the increaing crime rate,is there any quick and practical measures to solve this problem that affects everybody except the very few privileged people with close personal protection.Sorry to digress.But I feel the crime situation is getting from bad to worse.Concerning what was happening in Penang,I hope the robbery that befell the familes of the past and present Aduns(including the latest that happened to YB Pee’s daughter) is not politically connected.However the appeal made by certain MCA leaders definitely had political overtones.The problem is the sense of insecurity haunts most people these days whenever they are out of their homes moving around the streets or anywhwere.The molotov cocktail attack on YB Teresa Kok’s family was obviously committed by individuals or groups linked to a certain political party.
#6 by veddy.lum74 on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:21 am
wat happen to the lingam -videoclip -scandal issue?tengku adnan,vincent,tdm,,ex-cj………..?
when are they being prosecuted?
DONT THINK THAT THE RAKYAT WILL FORGET THIS ISSUE!
#7 by AsalUsuLMalaysia on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:42 am
I remember in 2005 Pak Lah had made an anouncement regarding CHINA had assign with PETRONAS MALAYSIA for 20 YEARS of Fuel Contract!
Is anyone had information regarding the Contract? How much Pak Lah had agree apon selling per barrel, was it fixed price on that time or follows the market price from time to times?
If he follows $USD80/barrel x(20years) during the time Malaysia in deep sh!t.
#8 by pulau_sibu on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:46 am
I would agree to have ISA if it is used against the thieves, robbers, gangsters
#9 by katdog on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:52 am
We already have laws for thieves, robbers and gangsters.
ISA is a law meant to give powers to the government to detain people SUSPECTED of causing/planning ‘unrest’. It is intentionally vague.Because such people have committed no actual crime and therefore their guilt is difficult to be proven in a court of law.
#10 by katdog on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 11:55 am
If there had been ISA in US, Martin Luther King and all the african american leaders would have been locked up under ISA for ‘civil disobedience’ or ‘attempting to incite civil unrest’.
#11 by Swordsman on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 1:07 pm
To Lim Koo,
Joseph Yam Chi Kwong is NOT Malaysian born. I think you got mixed up with Andrew Sheng who is Malaysian born, former Chairman of Hong Kong Stock exchange, and a former Advisor in Bank Negara before moving over to HK.
#12 by lofuji on Sunday, 28 September 2008 - 5:01 pm
TDM cried(whether croc tears or not we dont know) when he tried to combat money politics in UMNO but failed to reform.ZzzZZ PM took over in 2004 with overwhelming majority.The expectations were high that he could do what TDM couldnt but alas,the corrupt culture was so ingrained that he has to put the whole lot of them in Sg Buloh if ever any reform were to take place.This time in 2008 it is his turn to cry because the whole lot of them dont want change or cant change.So when party failed in the GE12m AAB was made the fall guy.Very convenient!Let the mayhem begin.
#13 by PHUAKL on Monday, 29 September 2008 - 8:54 am
The SIL is trying his best to keep the
FIL in power.
Without the FIL, where would the SIL be?
Malaysian politics under the BN regime is
getting more and more debased by the day!
Phua Kai Lit
#14 by iggy on Monday, 29 September 2008 - 2:50 pm
I must say mates, that this seems to be rather disturbing.
http://www1.mstar.com.my/cerita.asp?file=/2008/9/29/mstar_mutakhir/20080929125641&sec=mstar_mutakhir
Now, PAS wants to ensure that there is a muslim majority in Pakatan Rakyat??
What a monkey wrench into the whole mechanism!
Why can’t they see past religion?
It beggars belief!
Perhaps this is why, 916 had a little glitch. If those 31 MPs that were supposed to cross over were non-muslim, then PAS might have pulled out and snatched the majority away from PR.
Plausible?
What do you guys think?