Malaysia’s image and international standing are trampled upon and “rubbished” by the 54 Barisan Nasional MPs currently on a “blur blur” agriculture study tour of Taiwan as they are been tracked by the Taiwan print and electronic media as if they are bizarre or exotic creatures from a strange land if not from another planet.
Instead of conducting themselves as proud elected representatives of a nation held in high esteem in international circles, the 54 BN MPs are caught in a hide-and-seek with journalists as if they are fugitives from justice or agents of rogue nations as they are unable to give a honest and honourable explanation of the real purpose and reason for their sudden trip to Taiwan.
A Guang Ming Daily columnist has rightly coined the phrase “mong cha-cha” or “blur blur” tour to describe BN MPs junket to Taiwan, for the BN MPs were in a “blur” when summoned by SMS to submit their passports for the “trip to nowhere” as the country destination was not known and undecided, “blur” when they boarded the flight and continue to be “blur” when they landed in Taiwan.
The 54 BN MPs know that they have become a laughing stock in Taiwan and a standing joke wherever they go in the island republic. As a result, they cannot hold their heads high when appearing in public in Taiwan.
As MPs who should be Malaysian nationalists and patriots first and last, shouldn’t they do what is right – cut short their “blur blur” Taiwan trip so as not to prolong Malaysia’s shame and disgrace in Taiwan every day they are in Taiwan?
They should abandon the “blur, blur” agricultural study tour of Taiwan if they are not to be known as “blur blur” MPs not only for the rest of their elected term but the remainder of their lives.
In fact, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi should issue an immediate directive to recall the 54 BN MPs to cut short their “blur blur” agriculture study tour of Taiwan and return immediately to demonstrate that the BN has nothing to fear about “916” since BN leaders have repeatedly claimed that the BN MPs’ junket to Taiwan was not meant to derail Anwar Ibrahim’s “916” plan.
Apart from sparing the nation from continuing infamy in Taiwan and international shame as well as BN’s “fatal obsession”: with 916, there are many other reasons why the BN MPs’ “blur blur” agricultural tour of Taiwan should be truncated, such as the fasting month for Muslims, the Moon-cake festival for Malaysian Chinese and most important of all, September 16 as Malaysia Day not only for Sabahans and Sarawakians but for all Malaysians as well!

#1 by oknyua on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 9:14 am
Jeffrey, just a cautious note: How sure are you that Dato Seri Tiong is not the “katak” head? Hmm… his political history as well as personal life is not less colourful.
#2 by scta on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 9:20 am
mmm….mebe they are there to learn the ‘pinang’ industry, or to study the ‘leng-lui’ sell the pinangs by the roadside, hehehe…cuci mata lor…. ahahaha
#3 by Jeffrey on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 9:29 am
oknyua, you’re right, I’ve not thought of that angle. I superficially assume rich, well connected corporate-politico types like him will identify his interest with status quo and existing order. (I’m not familiar with the twists and turns of Sarawak real politik in relation to him). If he were really a head katak, its the best sandiwara I’ve ever seen on this 9/16 project yet. :)
#4 by boh-liao on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 10:46 am
What can we expect from ‘Ahmad Ismail’ whose name conceals the following messages?
‘Hi I Am A Mad SL’ (SL = sore loser)
‘I M Dial A Sham’
#5 by taiking on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:14 am
Have those mps had any dialogue with our local experts in agriculture (in Universiti Pertanian – now Putra) before making the decision to go to Taiwan? Have they exhausted all printed and online literature (local and international) on the relevant aspects of agriculture before making the decision to go? Have they tried to know and understand the subject a little bit better before going?
I doubt so. The idea was hatched rather casually when certain bbc members got together to talk and the date for the visit was fixed in a great huff. I dont think I am too far wrong to observe that it was a decision made on the spur of the moment.
But an exercise that involved 50 lawmakers cannot by any measure be considered small or unimportant or insignificant. Such exercise requires proper and careful prior planning and participants must be suitably equipped with the necessary basic knowledge before departing.
If not then they would all end up in Taiwan like any other uninformed tourist. With their jaws dropped and their eyes wide opened, they would just simply be awed by the taiwanese technology and agricultural advancement.
Of course, one should not discount totally the usefulness of that trip for it would certainly be a life enriching and eye opening experience for them. But arent these precisely the self-serving satisfaction which every tourist seeks? And our lawmakers are not there as mere tourists. They are there for a specific purpose. They are there to study and to learn from the taiwanese. The ulterior aim is so that they would be better informed and could debate a certain agriculture bill in parliament more effectively and one presumes, more meaningfully.
The whole event just look silly to me. It would be perfectly acceptable for me as an individual to act and behave silly. But for our lawmakers and 50 of them to do so in unison that is another matter altogether.
The public’s negative reaction towards the trip is fully justified in my view.
#6 by HJ Angus on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:18 am
If you watched the movie Braveheart (Mel Gibson’s portrayal of Wallace), there was an interesting scene just before the battle.
Some Irish leader was supposed to get the Irish to fight against him and they all charged towards Wallace’s lines and then suddenly they put down their arms and hugged each other.
So maybe that could be the surprise that Anwar will reveal. If you think about it, putting all those 49MPs in the sam place gives them more opportunity to think about their future (in PR?)
#7 by oknyua on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:30 am
Taiking, had this trip was organised at a different time, in a different atmosphere, I would gladly support, even donate a few ringgit if needed.
Taiwan is second only to Israel in term of its agriculture knowledge (followed by Thailand).
Secondly this is a step into recognising Taiwan’s qualification in Malaysia – how many taiwanese graduates with unrecognised qualification in Malaysia?
Thirdly, taiwan – and China, what is the difference? It is an acknowledgement that Malaysia cannot survive alone and in this case, let the likes of Ahmad be forever silenced.
Finally, it might be prudent to accept other languages in our “rasmi” column. Four billion world popn’ speaks English and almost 2 billions speaks mandarin.
Without the political clouds involved, it should be an acceptable trip. I hope BN and Malaysians would remember this trip in future.
#8 by hosengloong08 on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:58 am
What is the meaning of suspension for 3 years if the lad is still so arrogant?
OUr bolehland now in a fuk-up position alradi la.
#9 by owlz on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 12:11 pm
by: taiking
——————————————–
Have those mps had any dialogue with our local
experts in agriculture (in Universiti Pertanian
- now Putra) before making the decision to go to
Taiwan? Have they exhausted all printed and
online literature (local and international) on
the relevant aspects of agriculture before making
the decision to go? Have they tried to know and
understand the subject a little bit better before
going? Such exercise requires proper and careful
prior planning and participants must be suitably
equipped with the necessary basic knowledge before
departing.
.
——————————————–
——————————————–
.
HAAHHA!!! I agree with you Uncle taiking (Im
still young, I call you Uncle laaahh…). In
modern agronomy, its also include the plant breeding,
pesticides and fertilizers activity… Nowadays
plants also have been used to grow biofuels,
biopharmaceuticals, bioplastics… If 54 BN MPs
just went there without equipped, habislaaahh…
They will totally go back to Malaysia without
any benefit to us. EERRGGHH!!! Even my friends
thesis here in UM involve a genetic engineering
technology and require a really deeeeeppp damned
understanding for almost 6 months (one semester
laahhh). Just dont go there without any benefit
in this current instable economy condition laaahh…
#10 by LBJ on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 12:20 pm
Basic lesson of farming to Malaysian MPs In Taiwan.
The Changkul
===========
The changkul is the basic farmer’s tool. It precedes the golf stick by 2,000 years. The changkul is similar to the golf stick. It has a metal head and a wooden shaft. The changkul is used by the farmer to dig a hole in the ground. In way, it does the same job as a bad golfer making a hole in the ground. But, the farmer plant a seed with the hole he make.
When the farmer dig the ground, he swing the changkul in a downward direction. When a bad golfer dig the ground, he do it in an up wide swing.
That is all about the changkul
#11 by pulau_sibu on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 12:23 pm
So many Taiwanese industries invested in China and other Southeast Asian countries, and I wished more will be coming to Malaysia to invest and set up the factories. They are facing quite many problems in China and many switched to Vietnam in recent several years (as a matter of fact, it is difficult to deal with the people who are grown up under communism). Malaysia is an ideal place for the Taiwanese because of the language and culture (although many Taiwanese are good in English as well), but the bad policy drove them away. If you talk to them, the first thing they would tell you is about the government – they are afraid of the current government, as if anything like Indonesia against Indonesian Chinese (pai-hwa) will happen here. For whatever UMNO has done in the past, we now pay for the price.
There are a lot of our misconceptions with Taiwan. By watching Taiwanese movies, all spoken in Mandarin, I used to think that Taiwanese is a Mandarin speaking ‘country.’ But we are quite wrong because majority of them speak Min-nan (or Hokkian as we call it). Local Taiwanese had their language/dialect freedom robbed by Chiang Kai Shek the dictator as he ruled Taiwan.
If Anwar will become the Prime Minister and Pakatan Rakyat will become the government (we are all quite confident of this), don’t miss the opportunity to get closer to Taiwan. Taiwan universities produced so many graduates for Malaysia, yet we don’t appreciate it at all and we come out with this recognised or unrecognised degrees – what a true joke in the modern era. None of our minister can be better than the Taiwanese minister and none of our universities can be better than some of the best Taiwanese universities, yet we make a fool out of ourselves. Mahathir came out with the Look East Policy, but that was simply just half looking and not a true looking at the east, or just looking at a portion of the east.
These 54 MPs were suggested to visit the agricultural sectors in Taiwan. I think they better also look at the high-tech sectors. There are too many things for us to learn from Taiwan, and it is no doubt too difficult for these MPs to learn any yet.
#12 by kentutoyol on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 1:48 pm
Pocket money of 50k each.
Is it true?
http://m.themalaysianinsider.com/articles.php?id=8846-pak-lahs-future-may-be-out-of-his-hands
#13 by kentutoyol on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 1:51 pm
Sorry for the wrong link:
Pocket money of 50k each.
Is it true?
http://m.themalaysianinsider.com/articles.php?id=8842-sapp-hints-taiwan-trippers-got-rm50000-pocket-money
#14 by Toyol on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 2:02 pm
54 MP’s for a study tour? Whats wrong with the Agriculture Minister…so incompetent that he need 54 MP’s to do his job. What has the other 53 MP’s got to do with Agriculture?
That’s why M’sia is a bankrupt country. Makes us a mockery to the world. It reflects BN way of doing things…getting 54 people to do one person’s job.
#15 by TheWrathOfGrapes on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 2:51 pm
/// # ktteokt Says:
Yesterday at 12: 29.35
I am waiting to see the report of their “agricultural trip” which required them to bring along their golf gear! ///
Good news, ktteokt, I have got an advance copy of the contents page of the report, and it goes like this:
Rationale For The Study Trip
How to prevent our MPs from crossing over to the opposition.
(Note to self: must remember to delete the previous line and replace with the one below for the final report.)
How to increase the yield of Pinang palm, and study how the Taiwanese make use of scantily clad girls to sell pinang nuts along the roadsides.
Chapter 1
How to effective clear land for cultivation using golf clubs.
Stress the point that irons are better than woods for removing divots.
Chapter 2
Learn from Chen Shui Bian how to launder money.
(Note to self: must remember to remove this in the final report.)
Learn from the Taiwanese farmers about water irrigation and organic farming.
Chapter 3
Akan datang – my flight kakis are waiting to T-off now.
Please help me complete the report…
#16 by PHUAKL on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 2:59 pm
Dear YB Lim
May I add the following departments to my suggestion for a
“BN University”?
1. Department of Tourism
Aim: to train Malaysians who can encourage foreigners to come
to Malaysian for
“green tourism” (more specifically, “agricultural
tourism”). But since the Taiwanese are more advanced,
we’ll send a Malaysian delegation to Taiwan to
learn from their success first
2. Department of Animal Science
Aim: to train technicians to develop
frogs that cannot jump or can only jump
with great difficulty
Phua Kai Lit
#17 by cheng on on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 4:23 pm
While most ppl in Taiwan speak Minnan dialect in everyday life, but a person who speak only Minnan and not Mandarin will go nowhere, as most official meeting, discussion etc is done in Mandarin, Many ppl do not like Chiang Kai Shek, buthe never ban ppl speaking Minnan dialect. Hakka is another popular dialect in certain area of Taiwan.
Taiwan is more advance than Msia in many field, agriculture (small area but, enough rice for 23 million ppl), transport (bullet train, Taipei-Kaohsiung), education, higher income level, cheaper car price, etc, etc
#18 by lopez on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 10:00 pm
Some one please informed those mps dont go hanky panky , u never know the organiser may secretly cam them up real nicely.
Dont even go to the toilet a lone and maybe even need to do ear squats taiwan style.
#19 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 2:07 am
lol they left the realm unguard… and the Vampire(TDM) was coming on his way through their current premier hang on the age of a cliff.
Well done bunch of cowards, who doesn’t even dare to stand up agains our own dignity as elected leaders of a Nation.
BRAVO!~
#20 by TheWrathOfGrapes on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 8:54 am
Not to worry. At the last farm visit, each of them was given a garland of garlic to bring home…
#21 by Bigjoe on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:01 am
This whole objection to anti-hopping thing.
In general against hopping but the proposal is a rush job. BN treat the legislation like office memo and can issue anything out there like pieces of trash.
Hold BN accountable to anti-hopping law AFTER PR comes into power.. Want to bet those people who want it now will oppose it even more then?
#22 by Loh on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 11:34 am
///Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said he was surprised over Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s call for him to reconsider the 2020 transition plan, saying this has been agreed upon by Cabinet and Umno.///—The Star
PM AAB said he was surprised, and that implied that he was alert. When PM AAB said that the transition plan was agreed by Cabinet, did he mean that it was a unanimous decision. Can cabinet decide by majority vote? The same applies to UMNO supreme council decision making.
The transition plan is UMNO matter, and the transition plan was clearly a political party issue. The Cabinet might be a venue for discussing party issue if all members belong to the same political party, UMNO. Were non-UMNO members transparent in the Cabinet in the sense that they could be seen through, and do no appear to exist when Cabinet decisions were taken. This might explain why the presence of non-UMNO members in the Cabinet had no consequence on decisions taken in the Cabinet.
As AAB had been so used to treat Cabinet as UMNO meeting, he announced that the Cabinet asked Ahmad Ismail to apologize. If Ahmad Ismail had violated any law, he should be dealt with according to the law. The Cabinet cannot decide that a person is pardoned if he had violated the law of the land. The accused had to be charged in court, and only the court could decide whether the person was guilty, and the punishment that follows. Only a pardon board can decide on recommending for appeal, and the right authority will dispense with the pardon. The Cabinet decides all government policies, but it cannot implement them as though it is an absolute monarchy. So the Cabinet was wrong in law to direct Ahmad Ismail to apologize, and it was wrong in law in not accepting the apology of Wee Meng Chee.
PM AAB was not surprised that Muhyiddin invited TDM to return to UMNO. What is surprising is that AAB consider TDM’s application to join, or rejoin UMNO a UMNO issue, when the UMNO supreme council decided to welcome TDM to return at the time TDM resigned and declared that he would only return when AAB is no longer the President of UMNO. I suppose AAB has to be cautious of TDM’s reentry since if AAB says that he welcomes TDM’s reentry, UMNO’s lawyers might say that it is equivalent to AAB taking action to facilitate TDM’s entry into UMNO through agreeing to TDM’s condition that AAB resigned as UMNO President. Yes, a UMNO lawyer is the second highest in command in the Judiciary, but can AAB be sure that the judge will be on his side in view of AAB precarious hold to his chair?
AAB will now have to explain why the Supreme Council decision should not be binding. We will be happy to see AAB prevent TDM’s return. TDM will be worse for the country if he is in UMNO than outside. In fact the country would have been blessed if TDM’s father had not migrated to Malaya. Unfortunately there is no time machine to effect that change.
UMNO should have sacked TDM at the time when he announced his resignation, but did not have the political will to do so. It was a torn that removed itself from the flesh. UMNO supreme council was happy that the problem resolved itself, and would have hoped that his son would follow suit. But the son was a fence sitter, and now the father is returning to help him achieve his ambitions, or more accurately the family’s longer term hold on the future of the country. The persons who now voice their welcome of TDM might be hedging their bet, and showing the opportunistic character since they are convinced that the 916 change is fast approaching and AAB will soon be consigned to history. They forgot that their support for TDM will haunt them for years to come.
If AAB caved in to allow TDM to return, then all those UMNO power-has-been who are crying for AAB’s departure will be emboldened. They can always depend on TDM’s support to be readmitted should they be sacked. In a way the three-year suspension of Ahmad Ismail might be more effective them having him sacked from the party. He could return on TDM’s tailcoat long before his 3-year term is up. But then TDM is 83, and had the history of staying in hospital three times last year. How many times he is going in this year is anybody’s guess.
AAB has the legitimate reason to say that the supreme council’s decision to welcome TDM’s reentry was only valid at that time, and would continue so if TDM had stopped undermining UMNO. TDM will have to reapply for admission which will have to be decided by the party, and the Supreme Council which has the final authority. But has AAB the number to ensure that TDM does not submit his application? Is Muhyiddin confident that he would command the require number? If he had, he might have been able to gain his position as a Deputy PM without having to team up with Tengku Razaleigh to fight the unknown battle. Kuli has everything to gain but Muhyiddin has his MITI post to lose.
PM AAB should have aimed high to be the PM who brought change to Malaysia for the better. But he was not that ambitious and limited his sight on his family and his son-in-law. It is a wasted opportunity for himself, and the people who love Malaysia. We cannot say this of TDM who ( as devils’ advocate) suggested that Malay professional preferred joining force with a neighboring country to fight the British rather than going through the route Tunku took, with the social contract. That would mean that Malaysia would be part of another country. It is like surrendering our homeland without a fight. Why do we bother with our defense spending if that could be acceptable?
In this 21st century when countries which believed and had history of acting on racial superiority are rejecting the old habits of suppression based on race, we still have people championing inequality based on religion as surrogate for race. He who holds this racist view should be condemned. He who manipulated racial politics for individual benefits should just enjoyed their ill gotten gain, and migrates elsewhere so that others would not suffer their bad influence. Only Anwar as PM would achieve that. May be it would be better for AAB to invite Anwar as President of UMNO.
#23 by walao on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:59 pm
my god…are they taking the same flight to Taiwan? So many MP even if they spilt into 3 groups in 3 different planes. What happen if “something went wrong”? So many MP inside.
Yesterday saw the bernama news on Astro, those MP were learning how to make ” TONG YUEN” a chinese rice ball dessert. Did I hear this wrong? Can anyone justify this ? I saw this on Astro bernama chinese news around 1030pm.
#24 by mincetoiletpaper on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 1:19 pm
Why there was no 55th place for the MP’s trip? The 55th place is for PM Abdullah. He should learn up the tanam sayur cause his retirement plan had just been cut shorter.
Why need to take till 54MPs to Taiwan just to learn tanam sayur? Is our agricultural dept lagging of manpower till needs to get all the ‘Big Big’ Mps to go learning? Is the BN implying that their MPs is so free and nothing to do?. Why those 54MPs do not have a sound mind of their own? They should rejected it like some of the BN MPs did. At least they are some among them still using brains to work.
Is the govn going to place each MP for specialising to one crop? like 1 MP specialise Padi, 1 MP specialise Durian, 1 MP specialise Ubi kentang..?. They should be there teaching the Taiwanese how to do planting instead. Day 1 lesson: How to handle Kerbau..
Its so obvious even the blind can see the ‘Blur Blur’. 1 Blur Blur PM sending 54 buffalos to Taiwan. Taiwan headline should read : Malaysian send Taiwan 54 improvished buffalos.
#25 by ktteokt on Saturday, 13 September 2008 - 12:07 pm
mincetoiletpaper, all of them including the PM and cabinet ministers should now learn how to plant sweet potatoes (zhong fan shu)!
#26 by ktteokt on Monday, 15 September 2008 - 2:01 pm
Anybody knows the outcome of the “Agricultural Excursion” by our MPs? Have they learnt how to plant sweet potatoes yet? Or are they already digging up the backyard of AAB’s compound and planting sweet potatoes already?