Permatang Pauh reinforces message of March 8th


by Dr. Chen Man Hin

PERMATANG PAUH SENDS A CLEAR CONFIRMATION OF THE MESSAGE FOR CHANGE OF MARCH 8TH GENERAL ELECTIONS, AND IS A STUNNING VICTORY FOR PAKATAN RAKYAT FIRST-EVER ELECTION CAMPAIGN.

Anwar Ibrahim won by a clear majority of 15,671 votes in a constituency representative of the multiracial composition in Malaysia.

It is a very significant victory for the Pakatan Rakyat philosopy of democracy, justice, racial equality, freedom of religion, rule of law and transparency.

It is particularly significant as Malays form 69% of the electorate (41,000) with a good mix of Chinese and other races.

This is particulary galling to UMNO to see that their traditional Malay ground has rejected their policy of ketuanan melayu, corruption and cronysm.

The people of Permatang Pauh have spoken for the people of malaysia. They want change for a new Malaysia where all Malaysians whether Malays, Chinese, Indians, and indigenous races of Kadazans, Ibans, Bidayuhs and others, have an equal and just place under the Malaysian sun.

Prime Minister Datuk Abdullah should also take heed of Permatang Pauh’s rejection of his government’s conspiracy to charge Anwar of sodomy to prevent him from challenging his government and become the new Prime Minister of Malaysia. They regard the sodomy charge as fictitious. Only 11% of the people believe it according to prominent pollster Merdeka Centre, while 89% reject the sodomy charge.

The people have spoken. Anwar is THE ONE. He will lead the country to a new Malaysia of democracy, justice, rule of law and equal opportunities for all.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 - 9:08 pm

    i mean out of line* sry typo mistake.

  2. #2 by yhsiew on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 - 9:57 pm

    AAB failed to take the necessary steps to carry out reforms after Tsunami 308 and that had caused UMNO to lose in the PP by-election. Perhaps it was not in AAB’s expectation that a by-election could take place so quickly.

    AAB did not give the people the impression that he is a serious leader – he always does things half heartedly.

  3. #3 by zak_hammaad on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 - 10:07 pm

    Godfather, speaking behind my back is not very nice :^) As I have told you on many occasions, Mahathir will have a state funeral as should be accorded to the father of modern Malaysia. Your envy and hate will not change that! It takes more than the humble likes of me to defend the likes of Mahathir.

    Reposting from the other thread (as you have a tendency to avoid and repeat yourself):

    “Mahathir is going nowhere. His record of national development has earned him a state funeral at the very least. Even in a nightmare scenario where Anwar does become PM, he will have no mandate to try Mahathir. Anwar will want to be seen as “gracious” in “pardoning” his nemesis’ as AsalUsul points out in his remark about “forgiveness”.

    My move to Malaysia was not based upon the premiership of Mahathir and it will not end with his passing away. Malaysia can however, only dream of having another figurehead like him for decades to come!

    Going back to the topic of this thread; I wonder if Anwar would have been accorded the chance to compete if Malaysia followed S’pore’s example. The latest news item at channelnewsasia is interesting:

    “PM Lee said Singapore must never blindly follow others but should adapt its political system to suit its own circumstances.”

  4. #4 by kutlakut on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 - 10:08 pm

    quote bobster: Rakyat perception of this gomen has gone from bad to worst. The last attempt to ditch Anwar in the last hour with the sodomy case couple with Dewan Speaker attempt to delay swearing in Parliament causing BN to lose even more respect and trust from the rakyat. Basically these id**ts are scoring their own goals! unquote.

    How right you are – we don’t have to do anyhing to shake up the BN; let it be and whenever they meet up with the bogey man DSAI they fall apart. They become blundering idiots. All of them.

    You know what the astonishment is? They still don’t get it. What use is blocking the site for example? Yet they did that and made more people see their propensity for injustice, intimidation, and all the bad qualities. Sure reflect back to their policy of lying by not saying. Example: don’t report on the bad air pollution and the tourists will continue to come. See what I mean?

    Again, the tsunami election results clearly spell out that BN Has No Moral Right To Administer the country from this day 26 Aug.

    Again, BN component parties should know the equation has changed and it is upon them to effect the change of government. We can’t sustain another 4 years of damage to our beloved country. Get on with it man, the onus is on you to do what is right for the nation. Can we hope on you?

    Alas.

  5. #5 by zak_hammaad on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 - 10:12 pm

    yhsiew, the March election was not a “tsunami”, as once the tsunami settles, the sea returns to normality. The election was an earthquake where the plates alter forever; politics in Malaysia changed forever last March.

    Night night all.

  6. #6 by daryl on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 12:23 am

    Zak
    I admired Dr. M at one point but that is no longer valid because what he did to the country to achieve his personal goals. Nothing was done because he want better future for the country. All was done because he want UMNO and his legacieis stay forever.

    It took a weak leadership to expose all of the damage Dr M. did. So, we need to thank Abdullad Badawi because without him we are heading the wrong direction….

    Our thanks to the current PM…. That annoy you didn’t it… and on DSAI what comes around goes around. The sodomy case 10 years ago become a strength for DSAI this time and truth will set him free.. and you know why because the God I worship is in Heaven and the one you worship has a blog call chedet.com…

    :) God Bless

  7. #7 by lopez on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 6:29 am

    It time to start cleaning what underneath the carpet,
    lets start at the GLC, who approves to the “entrprenuers” and for all the WRONG reasons/
    Every body knows GLC gets the Ocntracts BUT….
    Who awards the sub contracts to who

    check them out yourself

  8. #8 by vsp on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 6:44 am

    Ever since I read Mathatir Malay Dilemma way back in the 1960s I have never trusted this man. I know he would destroy this country and sure it does. Yet he does not has the grace to admit any of his wrongdoings. What a sorry mess of a man he is!

  9. #9 by Toyol on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 9:42 am

    Even a small town like PP can understand that racial politics has no place in a modern Malaysia. The people realise that the more they hold on to race and religion, the further apart the respective races become. For us to move forward, we have to work as one, one aim, one concept, one people. We have to call ourselves Malaysians.

    UMNO will not allow this to happen as they believe it will dilute their power and hence their hold on money! They will try to force the races apart by playing racial card time and again. How are we to compete in the global arena if we do not know who we are? UMNO’s policy of divide and conquer must not be allowed to take root. It is hence a breath of relief and gives us hope that the majority of the voters in PP has rejected BN.

  10. #10 by lextcs on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 9:49 am

    1. I am amazed that there are still people in this country who think that the opposition parties “won” the general elections because they promised a more open society with transparency and whatnots, including of course doing away with the Internal Security Act.

    2. Do they think that the swing; the mass desertion of the Malay villagers from UMNO, the Chinese from Chinese parties and the Indians from MIC in order to vote for the opposition parties, be they PAS or DAP or PKR (Parti Keadilan Rakyat), was due to their wish to see the abolition of the ISA or to seek for greater transparency, or desire for greater human rights, for free speech and open discussions at intellectual levels?

    3. Are these the subjects that padi farmers, food stall holders and hawkers, the rubber tappers, the Class F contractors talk in the coffee shops at “intellectual” levels?

    4. Do they care that our democracy is not as liberal as the western democracies? Do they care about detached intellectual discourse by intellectuals who want to display their intellect?

    5. If they, the intellectuals think or believe that these kampong people, petty traders and hawkers voted for the opposition because of these ideals, because they have become very mature, because they want to see change, then think again. Go down to the very “unintellectual” level of these ordinary voters and try talking to them about your ideas.

    6. You will find that their concerns are about their cost of living, the price of padi, jobs for them and their children, some of whom are graduates, their small businesses, the little development for their villages and urban slums, their dissatisfaction with their treatment by Government officers and their wakil rakyat not visiting them etc.

    7. Whom do they blame? They blame UMNO and its leaders and the kowtow-ing leaders of MCA, Gerakan, MIC. In particular they blame the Prime Minister, Dato Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

    8. Why did they blame Abdullah? Their reasoning was simple. Under previous Prime Ministers they were very much better off; the prices of goods did not go up too high, their incomes had increased, the officials were more attentive and so were their wakils etc etc.

    9. Besides these there were no other changes. UMNO, MCA, Gerakan, MIC were all still there although they were somewhat different, being led at the local and national level by grasping politicians concerned with holding posts which gave them opportunities to enrich themselves, getting JPs (Justice of Peace), Datuk-ship, Tan Sri-ship and other ships, kissing the PM’s hand in order to win his favour. They cared more for what they could get from him than what they could do for the people. And his response was to favour these leaders and not the people. These leaders and party hacks would keep him as their President and therefore his Premiership. For the people he proposed Corridors in the future.

    10. The people did not object too much to the corruption. It would be good if they got a piece of the goodies themselves. But the Prime Minister did not bother. Comfortable with the support of his party people he did not see the need to bribe the people. So the people owed him nothing.

    11. They regarded him as being responsible for all their misfortunes simply because all these misfortunes came during his time, or more crudely it came from him. So it seems to them.

    12. One of the things that the simple people did not like was a lack of gratefulness shown by these leaders. They, the ordinary voters were too scared to protest over this show of ungratefulness on the part of the Prime Minister and his minions. But they felt strongly about Abdullah’s lack of gratefulness, especially as he let his minions show crudely their ungratefulness, cursing and condemning the people who had been responsible for their exalted position as Ministers etc.

    13. The people feared the reaction of the Government and did not voice their disgust at such uncouth behaviour. But that did not mean that they were prepared to overlook such displays of ungratefulness. And so the first time they felt free to express their views without fear they did – by voting against the Barisan Nasional.

    14. And so the BN lost. But the opposition did not win, certainly not because the simple voters liked the opposition. They won by default because that was the only way the erstwhile BN supporters could show their dislike for the people they blame for their problems. The BN lost, the opposition really did not win.

    15. The liberal intellectuals should be able to see this. But they wanted so much to believe that they had convinced the opposition parties and the voters about their ideals of liberal democracy, their free speech, transparency etc etc. that they took the apparent success of the opposition as being due to their espousing and the electorate being convinced of the kind of politics the intellectuals preach.

    16. And so when recently opposition party members behaved in the old ways, reverting to racism and religious intolerance, to disliking sensitive issues to be openly discussed, to regarding those of their own kind joining the liberals as betrayers, they became unhappy at what they consider to be treachery on the part of the opposition.

    17. But the opposition led by the wily master of spin, Anwar Ibrahim, only made a show of being liberal, of being advocates of freedom of expression, as being above racialism, of being against detendtion without trial and of being all the way with the liberal intellectuals. They have no intention of being all these. But it was good politics and a good way to hoodwink the naive intellectuals and their even more naive followers.

    18. The intellectuals and the pretenders had allowed themselves to be led by the nose up the garden path. The hard nosed real politicians, especially of the oppositions are laughing.

    19. It is time the so-called intellectuals realise they were being duped by the Master of Spin, the pious Muslim who is also the bosom pal of Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-con Jew, the killer of Muslims, the supporter of Hindraf and of the Chinese schools etc. etc.

    20. But intellectuals will not admit they have made a grave mistake. They see what they want to see. Carry on dreaming. Hold your forum, discuss what you like. You are driving the people further and further apart, pushing them back to their old racialism. You are helping to hold up a regime that is incompetent and thoroughly corrupt. You are helping to destroy this country.

  11. #11 by scorpian6666 on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 9:55 am

    Dr. M said…….

    “1. I am amazed that there are still people in this country who think that the opposition parties “won” the general elections because they promised a more open society with transparency and whatnots, including of course doing away with the Internal Security Act.”

    19. It is time the so-called intellectuals realise they were being duped by the Master of Spin, the pious Muslim who is also the bosom pal of Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-con Jew, the killer of Muslims, the supporter of Hindraf and of the Chinese schools etc. etc.

    20. But intellectuals will not admit they have made a grave mistake. They see what they want to see. Carry on dreaming. Hold your forum, discuss what you like. You are driving the people further and further apart, pushing them back to their old racialism. You are helping to hold up a regime that is incompetent and thoroughly corrupt. You are helping to destroy this country.”

    I am shocked ! We were once ruled by a man of such “intellectual”

    A man once PM using the words “Jew, Hindrad, Chinese School and Muslim show nothing but more a man with immerse emotional problems ! hallucinating ! an extreme racist !

    And people like Zak admiring him for that ! very much like a cult !

    A State Funeral for him ! Please Use UMNO’s money and your kinds

    I would just shed a tear since he is also human with blood as red as mine.

    Dr.M had already use up his times … Let Anwar “Speak!

  12. #12 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 10:39 am

    OMG i once respect him so much and for this i got slap hard in the face for nothing. Why is he saying this?…

    Evaluate from his words i can see his desperate and struggling hard, maybe he really fears DSAI might go after him. Poor devil. “What you plants, is what you get”, you dont get Rambutan tree from Durian seeds u ass.

  13. #13 by k1980 on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 11:21 am

    After only 8 years as Taiwan’s President, Chen Shiubian has stashed away USD36 million in Swiss banks. So after 22 years, how much do you think the mamak king has stored overseas?

  14. #14 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 12:24 pm

    not much i guess, he was decent enough to stored some in bank negara, but wasted by this goons in 5years… they starts fighting like monkey in the cage… my storage bananas become peanuts u ass RAWR FIghtfightfight!~ roflmao

  15. #15 by boh-liao on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 1:18 pm

    Yes, when MM passes away, his grave should well be protected and guarded with cctv, lest people urinate on his grave.

    Guess we will definitely have an ang moh volunteer and fan to do the job.

  16. #16 by One4All4One on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 3:47 pm

    Dear contributors,

    It is observed that name-calling and bad mouthing are without limits here. It surely does not reflect well on us and the blog itself that there are no restraints at all. For good measure, there must be some semblance of respect of others. Then only can we expect the same from others.

    We should not go to the extent of levelling accusations without basis or smearing someone’s name and character. We can disagree with others but that does not mean we can simply discredit their opinions and beliefs with glee and disrespect. It only shows one’s immaturity and crudeness, poor upbringing, and bad faith.

    Debate and disagree all you want. But please do not resort to crude and foul languages. It is just not right and uncouth to do so.

    Thank you.

  17. #17 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Thursday, 28 August 2008 - 4:19 pm

    Apologised for my miss behave, sorry.

    Sorry YB LIM sry…

    correct my mistakes i baned myself for the day posting. T_T!

Comments are closed.