Hishammuddin’s apology – Malay keris-wielding antics laid to rest?


Two weeks ago, when speaking at the first public ceramah/consultation with DAP MPs, Excos, State Assembly representatives in Ipoh, I broached the subject when the UMNO Youth leader and Education Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussin will publicly apologise for his offensive, irresponsible and provocative “Malay keris” antics which MCA, Gerakan and even Umno leaders had blamed as one of the causes of the Barisan Nasional’s debacle in the March 8, 2008 general election “political tsunami”.

I said:

Hishammuddin should publicly apologise for his “Malay keris” antics and MCA, Gerakan and other Barisan Nasional leaders should demand in unison for such an apology and assurance of no repetition in Cabinet and Parliament.

Unless Hishammuddin is prepared to make a public apology and MCA, Gerakan and other BN leaders in Cabinet and Parliament take a public position demanding that Hishammuddin publicly apologise for his offensive, irresponsible and provocative “Malay keris” antics, it could not be said that Umno, MCA, Gerakan and BN leaders have learnt anything from the March 8 “political tsunami”.

The questions I want to pose tonight is whether Hishammuddin is prepared to publicly apologise for his irresponsible and provocative “Malay keris” antics and whether MCA, Gerakan and other BN leaders are prepared to demand in unison for such an apology and assurance of no repetition in Cabinet and Parliament as proof that they have taken seriously the voice of Malaysian voters in the March 8 “political tsunami”.

Now Hishammuddin has made his apology, although quite an ambivalent one.

MCA, Gerakan, MIC and Umno leaders are euphoric and ectastic with Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak declaring that Hishammuddin’s apology was “something great and noble” and calling on the issue of the “keris-wielding” to be put to rest.

I had repeatedly lambasted Hishammuddin for his irresponsible, offensive, insensitive and provocative “Malay keris wielding” in the last Parliament even citing it as a reason for a RM10-salary cut for the Education Minister’s pay as a censure, and I was extremely disappointed that apart from support from other DAP MPs, there was not a squeak of protest against the keris-wielding antics its from the Barisan Nasional ranks, whether front or back benches, whether MCA, Gerakan, MIC, Umno or from other BN component parties.

I can accept Hishammuddin’s apology, however haughty or ambivalent, but the issue cannot just be forgotten and buried if no attempt is made to understand its root causes and how and why it could happen – symptomatic of something very wrong with half-a-century of Malaysian nation-building.

Hishammuddin’s irresponsible, offensive, insensitive and provocative “Malay keris wielding” symbolized the worst of Umno political hegemony, which was mischievously equated with Malay political power.

It represented a rejection of the Vision 2020 objective of creating a “Bangsa Malaysia” out of the diverse races and religions in Malaysia, a repudiation of the concept of “ketuanan Malaysia” to replace “ketuanan Umno” camouflaging as “ketuanan Melayu” and a refusal to accept that all Malaysians must be treated as equal and rightful citizens in Malaysia.

In apologizing for his insensitive “Malay keris wielding”, is Hishammuddin prepared to fully respond to the paradigm shift pioneered by the voters in the March 8 “political tsunami” for a fully Malaysian approach, transcending race and religion, to the nation-building challenges of the country where the focus is no more on competition between Malays and non-Malays but between Malaysians and the rest of the world in the highly competitive era of globalization?

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by babique on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 8:46 pm

    Probably it’s karma. I was told that his daughter “exposed” herself and is widely circulated via emails. Anyone here has a copy?

  2. #2 by undergrad2 on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:05 pm

    To engage in rhetoric about how the federal government thinks state governments must bow to it etc and how racial politics continue to dictate decisions they make is a waste of time. We are way passed that.

    The fact that BN could be expected to behave like a woman scorned is also obvious. The issue is what can be done to control the fury that Hell has unleashed!

  3. #3 by Justicewanted on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:11 pm

    Sunday April 27, 2008 MYT 7:25:49 PM
    Hishammuddin urged to quit over keris issue
    By HAMDAN RAJA ABDULLAH

    MUAR: Many Umno branch and divisional leaders here want Umno Youth chief Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein to resign over the keris issue which they said had adversely affected Barisan Nasional in the recent general election.

    Datuk Kadar Shah Tun Sulaiman Ninam Shah said about 90 branch and 25 divisional leaders made the call Sunday after Hishammuddin had admitted the keris issue was among the causes of Barisan’s poor performance in the March 8 polls.

    To admit the mistake was not good enough, he said, if the Youth chief did not take responsibility and resign from all party and government posts.

    Kadar Shah said that having a Cabinet minister for several terms, Hishammuddin should be mature enough to know what a leader should do, and should have known that brandishing the keris could hurt the feelings of other races.

    He said branch and division committee members, including former Sungai Balang assemblyman Zakariah Mahadi, wanted Hishammuddin to gracefully resign from all party and government posts.

    Sunday Star

  4. #4 by smeagroo on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:11 pm

    Now he is sorry la. But dont be fooled. Just a ploy to win back some votes and brownie points. Can a leopard change its spots? Can a snake like hisssshamuddin not grow another head? We are through with UMNO and BN. Never ever ever ever fall for this kind of pathetic sandiwara. He wanna say sorry, come n kiss my …

  5. #5 by LohSH on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:14 pm

    It is very unfortunate for a well educated person like Hisham, coming from a well respected family, to have resorted to a controversial instead of a progressive way, of getting support to climb up the UMNO political ladder.

    One should forgive Hisham for his ambiguity in his apology over the kris incidents, as he is now walking dangerously on a tight rope.

    At this extraordinary hour, when specific persons are clearly required to be held responsible for the recent GE debacle, it is entirely up to his comrades to decide whether they are willing to provide him the necessary safety net.

    His apology may turn out to be the beginning of a nightmare.

  6. #6 by limkamput on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:28 pm

    nakedtalibam Says: Well said Sdr.Limkamput, saya sokong.
    Thank you nakedtalibam for the compliment.

  7. #7 by limkamput on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:29 pm

    It is also rhetoric and waste of time for someone to raise grandmother story about what Kerismuddin was trying to do with the keris. Who doesn’t know that. I think it is also a waste of time for this arrogant bloke to read diligently the “rhetoric” I wrote. Really funny!

  8. #8 by HJ Angus on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:51 pm

    The unfortunate thing about Malaysia is that many leaders of potential like H were thoroughly spoilt by the NEP and the Ketuanan bogey.

    Some of them may need to spend a few years in the political wilderness before they mature enough to become true national leaders who treat all Malaysians with justice.

    http://malaysiawatch3.blogspot.com/2008/04/that-keris-apology-little-late-but.html

  9. #9 by pjboy on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:07 pm

    An apology with a condition is not an apology.

    There is no reason or right to leverage for such an apology when he (our self declared Hangmuddin ) is the offender.

    Can MCA or MIC wield traditional or cultural weapons? What kind of society or civilisation are we living in? We are no more in the 15th century. Somebody wake Hangmuddin up.

    Was it true that only royals can hold the keris – officially – & also that once the keris has been wielded, it cannot be retreated unless it was a sign of surrender or cowardice…recalling from one of RPK ceramah, which he highlighted with much amusement from the crowd.

    Btw, if HANG Li Po was a Chinese princess…then wouldn’t that make HANG Tuah, HANG Jebat, HANG Lekiu & HANG Kasturi (hope I got all 4 names right!!!) related? They seem to share the HANG name.

  10. #10 by novice101 on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:21 pm

    Syed Ali’s perverted logic.

    Syed Ali of Cheras UMNO division opined that it was not necessary for Hishammuddin to apologise. He says he sees no difference between the Agong holding up the keris and kissing it in his investiture and what Hishammuddin has done. This shows Syed Ali does not understand the non-Malays. And it also reveals he does not know how to see things in its proper context. When the Agong does the act, it is done in the context of tradition of the Malay Monarchy. The non-Malays have no argument against that. We respect the constitution. But when Hishammuddin did it in was done in a very different context and atmospere. He did it in the UMNO Youth General assembly where the non-Malays were made the punching-bags. This is what the non-Malays cannot accept. There is a vast difference between the two.

  11. #11 by undergrad2 on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:21 pm

    “So a leader can get away with a call for a blood-bath but marginalized citizens get arrested for simply asking the government to look into their plight? HJ Angus

    Only a Malay leader from UMNO can get away with the saber rattling which is what it is and the rest risk being detained for calling the nation’s attention to their legitimate interests for as long as judges interpret “threat to national security” as meaning threat to UMNO.

  12. #12 by blablowbla on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:33 pm

    hong kong has a star called ‘tye hao ching’,tis kerisputin’s mouth is even bigger than his,so you can forget about his sincerity!

    a leader must lead by example,intelligent,kind,cool,humble,able to listen,able to receive criticism,broadminded,……..,i cant find any of tat with big mouth!

  13. #13 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:43 pm

    “I apologise to the non-Malays and the Malays. To the non-Malays because of the fear to a symbol which was not my intention. And to the Malays for not being able to uphold their symbol of heritage.” – Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussin

    The apology is rightly described as ‘ambivalent’. A sincere apology would demonstrate remorse by acknowledging wrong doing specifically and exclusively to the offended party – in this case, the Non Malays – so as to restore the relationship before commission of the offence. Not however in this case! By saying that non-Malays feared “the symbol” is to maintain his consistent position that not only was there no offence intended but also the fact that there was no offence committed except an imaginary one which would not have been misconstrued as an offence had the offended properly understood the keris as a symbol of Malay heritage…Hence the corollary apology to Malays for “not being able to uphold their symbol of heritage”…

    It would be correct to observe that it was an ‘apology’ that was intended to sound like one, look like one and accepted like one but not actually one under closer examination.

    And it would not have been so readily proffered if it were not for the fact that after 8th March electoral debacle there has been a witch-hunt going on within BN as to who caused or was contributory to cause the mighty party apparatus to lose its invincibility of 50 years. This kind of panic-induced searches for perceived wrong-doers comes normally after a shock of unexpected defeat and now offers the perfect excuse to look for scrapegoats and remove them from party heirarchy so that others might move up the echelons – in short a naked struggle for power and position couched under the pretext of soul searching in order not to repeat mistakes for the future of the group! (Hence, Umno Cheras demanded FT Minister Zulhasnan Rafique to step down; powerbrokers in Kedah and Johore made similar calls on the PM himself etc ). For the ones targetted it is the season for apologies, no matter how insincere, as part of strategy to mitigate criticisms of and sever past mistakes so as to move on with a clean slate without historical baggage…So Ku Li would admit that BN’s losses in Kelantan could have been due to his having cooperated with PAS in the general election in 1990 so that he could contest for the top post free of this baggage and so would Hishamuddin as he sought to move up beyond UMNO Youth…

    I wonder whether it is necessary now to still pursue this question further whether in apologizing for keris wielding, Hishammuddin is prepared to fully respond to the paradigm shift pioneered by the voters in the March 8 “political tsunami” for a Malaysian approach, transcending race and religion when it seems to me that the keris wielding itself has been a major contributory factor in causing this paradigm shift…

  14. #14 by blablowbla on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:44 pm

    it was a very big mistake for PAK TIDUR not to warn him about the provocative action;and another bigger mistake,again,by PAK TIDUR,is to remain the education ministerial post for big mouth!

  15. #15 by bennylohstocks on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:46 pm

  16. #16 by Short-sleeve on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:50 pm

    Hishamuddin is a low life and he is not sincere. Enough of these UMNO-BN wayang kulit. They need to be removed, period.

  17. #17 by alaneth on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:59 pm

    Now that Kerismuddin has apologised, next on the list shall be Khairy on all his remarks, protests etc, which may have hurt the rakyat of all races.

    We all know from gossips, that the No.1&2 factors of why BN lost is due to :
    1. Kerismuddin factor.
    2. Khairy factor.
    3. Hindraf factor.
    4. UMNO Cronies & Corruption issues
    5. Other sensitive issues like temple demolition, body snatching, pig farming, ban this & that, Zakaria, Khir Toyo factor etc.

    Once we get to Item No.2, we go to 3, 4 & 5…

  18. #18 by cemerlang on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 11:08 pm

    We need to be educated on the importance of customs and traditions and their association with politics. Like a Malay keris or knife. It is curved which means that if it strikes, it is deadlier than a straight knife. Most of the times, a knife touches blood and blood symbolizes life. In many events, a Malay keris is part of the ceremony for example a university graduation protocol.

    Datuk Hishamuddin’s apology is a laughable matter because it came after the elections. If Barisan Nasional still managed a big win, he would definitely still not apologize. Malaysians must be so soft hearted and so good to forgive and forget. We can forgive but never forget, in case the same thing happens again. It might happen again since some quarters believe that they are the masters of Malaysia. We must always be on alert and remind each other that we are Malaysians.

    I agree to a change. In fact a big change. The name Barisan Nasional should change also.

  19. #19 by pgsilai on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 11:41 pm

    Almost everything concerning Penang is delayed and uncertain. Is that the way they are going to punish Penangites for voting them out? Do you think that way they can win our heart back? NO WAY!
    Come next election BN will be finished or maybe earlier.

    Limkamput says it right, get Inland Revenue to disclose the amount of revenue generated from these states. Is the rakyat’s money and we want to spend it wisely. It doesn’t belong to BN.

    As for Hishamuddin’s apology. tell him “Wayang Kulit” sekarang tak laku anymore, people watch “Youtube” now.

  20. #20 by reader on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 11:41 pm

    I like the following: “Hishammuddin’s irresponsible, offensive, insensitive and provocative “Malay keris wielding” symbolized the worst of Umno political hegemony, which was mischievously equated with Malay political power.”

    I believe that we are all talking about sensitive issues. Please do not scratch old wounds.

    I believe that for now, we should take it as apology made, apology taken.

    Shouldn’t we behave like what adults should?

  21. #21 by sheriff singh on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 11:56 pm

    You call this an apology? If you want to apologise, just say it straight and clear, not to mumbo jumbo about and call it an “apology”.

    Thats the problem with UMNO and BN people. They just can’t say it loud and clear and straight forward. It all comes from the top, from Pak Lah downwards. Just No Guts or bolas. It must be their “culture”.

  22. #22 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:03 am

    Unfortunately the reality is Malaysia is not a true federation.

    If the Federation of Malaysia were a true federation, then the states would have their own police, their own courts etc and control over their own finances. As it is revenue is a federal matter. We do not have two levels of taxes to pay i.e. federal and state taxes. In a true federation, the states would pass their own tax law. Some states may be troubled by constant budgetary deficits and would have to fall on federal assistance.

    A true federation would allow the states to have their own state police, and state courts with the highest being the State Supreme Court. Instead control over the police rests solely with the federal government and the highest court in the country is the Federal Court. As it is the states have control only over land, Malay customs and religion – very little else.

    Demanding that the federal government reveal the amount of taxes contributed by opposition states is taking federal-state relations to a new low. The next would be to demand that federal government reveals how much of the country’s income taxes are contributed by Chinese taxpayers. It is hypocritical to make such demands and yet call for an end to racial politics. This is the kind of empty rhetoric we could expect to hear from those who claim to know what is best for the country but who could not rise above the rhetoric they themselves are constantly spinning

  23. #23 by The Lord Of The Ringgit on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:08 am

    To show his apology is sincere, at least Kerishmuddin must cry & drop some tears at newspaper & TV, because in UNMO culture, everything will be OK after you cry, Rafidah did it, Zakaria (alr died) also did it.

  24. #24 by pulau_sibu on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:14 am

    i am a little disturbed. why jews have to be mentioned, and with chinese? i am not sure of the intention of this minister by saying so

    >Copy Jews and Chinese, Malays told
    >PENANG: The Malays should emulate the Jews and the Chinese who are far-sighted in developing a progressive society.
    >Second Finance Minister Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop said the Jews, for example, would make development plans that would ensure they would excel for another 1,000 years.

  25. #25 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:26 am

    “Nor Mohamed Yakcop said the Jews, for example, would make development plans that would ensure they would excel for another 1,000 years.”

    That is because the Jews have been waiting for their Messiah for the last 2,000 years. What is another 1,000 years? Little do they realize that the Messiah has come and gone and that we are in the End Times.

  26. #26 by novice101 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:36 am

    Lim Guan Eng should call Nor Mohamad’s bluff. He wouldn’t dare to cancel the big projects, he is doing some posturing himself. He is from Penang himself, does he dare to punish his fellow Penangnites? He would be committing suicide. Not only that he will be bring Abdullah Badawi with him, as AAB is also from Penang.

  27. #27 by alancheah on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:46 am

    Totally NOT sincere at all. And several BN
    people said that he should not say sorry.
    Sigh, what has happened to our Malaysia?
    Why got so many of them still NOT wake up yet?

    Truely sad case.

    Please keep on voting PKR-DAP-PAS, so that
    we can have even bigger change in the next election.

    Sick with BN’s policies!!!

  28. #28 by pulau_sibu on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:55 am

    >Jews have been waiting for their Messiah
    Many Jews are not the Orthodox Jews. Orthodox Jews are the extremists. Together with Hamas, they also present a problem for Israel. Most of the people there love peace. I could see how little we know about the real Israel.

  29. #29 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:56 am

    I think someone is obviously talking nonsense and probably has no intellectual honesty. When was there a demand for accounting of taxes paid for by Chinese? Obviously the insinuation was made by a corrupted mind and with worst of intention. I think to demand the IRB to reveal the amount of taxes collected from PK controlled states is not unreasonable given the present circumstance. It is asked within the context of federal government’s arbitrary discretion over allocation of fund and projects to various states. Precisely we do not have fiscal decentralisation and that is why there is a need for proper accounting of revenue and expenditure by states within the federation. Your allusion to state court, state police and state taxes are totally irrelevant and baloney. Please don’t run before you know how to walk. In any case, your half baked idea is probably governed by irrelevant examples you saw in the US. For your information, a state in the US is bigger than many countries. California used to be one of the top ten economies of the world. Can you imagine state like Perlis and Melaka having their own state court, police and taxes system? They would have nothing left to do anything else.

    To you, every damn thing is constitution as if nobody knows what is provided in that hopelessly outdated document (as far as financial provisions are concerned). Tell me, is there anything illegal or unconstitutional to demand for proper accounting of revenue and expenditure by states if the Federal Government are picky and less than transparent and fair in fiscal management. Federal state relationship is two-ways traffic. May I know who is causing the new low in federal state relation? The federal government is as culpable, more so the constitutional provisions have been less than fair to the states. I am talking good politics here. But I am not trying to stop someone talking lousy legal, draconian post 9/11 and constitutional rhetoric. Bunkum, yes bunkum, that is the word.

  30. #30 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:58 am

    ….and that we are in the End Times.

    God said that is not for you to say or postulate.

  31. #31 by AhStone on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 2:35 am

    seems like an apology, sounds like an apology but no its not apology… what is an apology when he says he has no guarantee if he will do it again in the next UMNO meeting? its like i hit someone then i say sorry and then i say there’s no guarantee i will hit u again. he should just resign at least to show he means something but as usual these muka tembok 100 inci people wont resign just like semi value. another nail in to the coffin of BN and UMNO.

  32. #32 by miwaki on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 2:37 am

    This is not apology,this is an acknowlegment of failure as a result of keris wielding.Please take up advertisement space in all news paper to say you are sorry for your moronic act.

    And please do not start your sentence with if…,no if whatsoever,just say you are terribly sorry for…..etc.

  33. #33 by Open Air on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 4:51 am

    .

    one down one to go …

    now its time for the spineless dpm to apologize …

    .

  34. #34 by Godfather on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 7:10 am

    “The fact that BN could be expected to behave like a woman scorned is also obvious. The issue is what can be done to control the fury that Hell has unleashed!”

    How do you control the fury that Hell has unleashed by your favourite critic on this thread ?

  35. #35 by cucu adam on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 7:15 am

    Much had been said about Hishamuddin’s behaviours, and even for a moment we give him the benefit of doubts that he was sincere in his apology to the Malaysian public for his uproar behaviour, it is rather to late crying over spilling milk as the damages are already done, and may never, never even be remedy.

    As I see it, with the regard to waving the kris in public on such an important occasion to the he was actual pleased with himself over what he had just did.

    Assuming that he rises to be Number 1 or 2 could he be trusted to behave himself without hurting the public feelings or will he takes years later to realise that he made mistakes and seek for apologies. We all made mistakes but under no circumstances the mistakes would seriously hurt others.

    The price for the mistakes did was, to some extent resulted in the BN/UMNO failed to get the 2/3 that they sought, and 4 other states going to Pakatan Rakyat while at the same time retaining Kelantan.

  36. #36 by mohammadharrisjalil on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 7:25 am

    Hi.. I just read Harakahdaily… so i think i should share it with all of you as well.. its in Bahasa… hope its okay… :-)

    Keris tidak lagi dijulang tapi keangkuhan masih ada pada Umno – Anwar

    Salmiyah Harun
    Sun | Apr 27, 08 | 10:39:09 am MYT
    SHAH ALAM, 27 April (Hrkh) –

    Ketua Umum KeADILan, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata Ketua Pemuda Umno Dato’ Hishamuddin Tun Hussien tidak perlu mengulangi kesilapan mengangkat keris yang memberi gambaran keangkuhan bangsa Melayu.

    Katanya, kesilapan beliau bukan soal keris yang dijulangnya tetapi di sebaliknya iaitu sikap keangkuhan kuasa yang terus-menerus membuatkan rakyat negara ini mengubah undi mereka dalam pilihan raya lalu.

    “Umno telah mempermainkan isu bangsa, etnik dan kaum dalam politik negara kita dan ini masih diteruskan oleh Umno,” katanya dalam sidang media selepas melancarkan dua buah buku Allahyarham Rustam A. Sani di Perpustakaan Raja Tun Uda.

    Misalnya kata beliau, dalam ulasan isu ternakan babi di Selangor dan ulasan mengenai ketuanan Melayu kononya orang Melayu sudah bangkit dan marah.

    Keadaan ini katanya memberi makna sentimen keangkuhan masih kukuh dalam Umno yang tidak boleh lagi diterima oleh rakyat negara ini.

    “Langkah menyatakan minta maaf itu amat kita alu-alukan tetapi perkara ini harus diambil serius terutama sentimen dalam Umno iaitu menjulang keris,” katanya.

    Beliau berkata demikian mengulas tindakan Hishamuddin yang meminta maaf dan mengakui perbuatan menjulang keris Panca Warisan dalam Perhimpunan Agung Umno telah menjejaskan undi BN dalam pilihan raya lalu.

    “Saya minta maaf pada orang bukan Melayu kerana telah menakut-nakutkan mereka dan kepada orang Melayu kerana gagal mempertahankan simbol warisan orang Melayu.

    “Saya bukan angkuh dan sombong yang tidak boleh memohon maaf dari orang lain,” katanya dalam sidang media selepas mesyuarat jawatankuasa Pemuda BN di ibu negara hari ini.

    The rest of the article is available in harakahdaily website.. TQ

  37. #37 by Godfather on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 7:26 am

    The UMNO guy that made the provocative comment of asking when Kerismuddin was going to use the raised keris (to the applause of all the delegates) is now the head of the BBC.

    Didn’t Kerismuddin also saythat UMNO will raise the keris at every AGM until the non-Malays are “de-sensitised” ?

    Dredging up the bad memories of the past….sigh….

  38. #38 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:04 am

    “How do you control the fury that Hell has unleashed by your favourite critic on this thread ?” GODFATHER.

    In his case it is not to control. It is to nurture, to stoke the flames, to let him be consumed by his own anger!

  39. #39 by ktteokt on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:07 am

    Miwaki is right! By beginning his “apology” with the word “IF”, it makes his whole “apology” nonsense. What has happened, has happened and cannot “unhappen”! And he as a leader in the BN government and Minister of Education should have used his brains (if he had one) to think of all consequences of his acts, rather than satisfying his own ego at the expense of others.

    By beginning his “apology” with the word “IF”, he made his “apology” a conditional one, which means “if no one is offended by his barbaric act”, he will continue with his arrogance and continue to raise the keris!!!!!!

  40. #40 by dawsheng on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:08 am

    “I apologise to the non-Malays and the Malays. To the non-Malays because of the fear to a symbol which was not my intention. And to the Malays for not being able to uphold their symbol of heritage.” – Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussin

    Since when Hishammuddin is the chosen one to protect the symbol of Malay heritage? Is the symbol of Malay heritage a matter of thrusting the Keris into the air during political gathering coupled with recital of racial rhetorics? Going by Hishammudin’s explanation, it was our fault that he has to apologize for being a clown.

  41. #41 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:27 am

    Godfather,

    To our mutual ‘friend’ i.e. one who lurks around threads, ready to pounce on anyone who disagrees, the following by Benjamin Disrael is worth some attention:

    “To be conscious that you are ignorant is a great step to knowledge.”

  42. #42 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:49 am

    But on second thoughts, perhaps what Confucious said is more applicable:

    “Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.”

  43. #43 by pjboy on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:56 am

    Typical bad politician. Apology also must politicise about Non-Malays & Malays. Still playing the racial rhetoric here. Rightly said, the apology also too late – only after losing badly in the GE.

    His apology is definitely not sincere & still some vibes of arrogance there. It’s only perceived as an apology & to gain sympathy from Malays. Since when he was the chosen one to uphold the Malay symbol. Is Ong Ka Ting or Ong Tee Kiat the chosen one to uphold the Chinese sword? Clearly, Hangmuddin has undermined the role of the Royals. So, from Hangmuddin perspective, he is the upholder of Malay culture. For that reason, gives him the brains & power to wield the keris whenever he feels like it. He belong to be in Tanjung Rambutan. The country can do without such politician.

    To uphold any culture, do we really need a politician to teach us the importance? Leave this to the schools. That’s suppose to be the Education Minister’s job, which ironically, was held by Hangmuddin himself. Instead, as a leader, to encourage the school teacher’s to teach about other cultures, he self-declared himself as the almighty upholder & protector of Malay culture. It was truly political & to incite racial support for UMNO. To me, it was also an insult to the Malay intelligence. It was also a show of no respect at all to the Royals of Malaysia, who are the true upholders & protectors of Malay culture. It goes to show, the anti-Royal sentiments that UMNO still trying to preach.

    If this kind of culture continues, Malaysia will never move forward & become truly ASIA. Malaysia (as far as UMNO-Bn sees it) should be Malay Malaysia only. So, why should Chinese, Indians & other minority races pay tax or contribute to the economy for then? Just to rent a space to live? This kind of ideology is worst than communism. It is becoming more like apartheid &/or facism…remember Hitler? Those Hindraf-5 detained in ISA were not terrorist, the real terror to the country are those in the BN-gov. Lastly, it all boils down to greed – for money & power.

    Just speaking my mind.

  44. #44 by blablowbla on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 9:18 am

    wat about the mamak UMNO youth leader tat challenged chinese for a fight at the Chinese Assembly Hall couple
    of years ago?

    AS for the issue of taxes,i supposed IRD is the most ‘open-minded’ department in the gomen,when come to revenue,they dun practise discriminations,they dun care you are non-muslim,christian,buddhist,hindu,iban,kadayak or atheist,or even anti-islam,if you are earning more than rm50,000,even illegal business,you must pay them,then they will channel the money to MoF,then to MARA or the relevant UMNO parasite bodies like BAKTI or BALKIS………………..bravo to IRD,for not practising NEP!(god knows!)

  45. #45 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 9:41 am

    For some who keep quoting the sayings of sage or great statesman but they themselves have demonstrated the mind of a bird is real pathetic (to animal lovers, I am not trying to insult the bird). They know not what they read but keep repeating like a parrot. It is really beyond me to comprehend their evilness.

    I think the truth hurts. The fact is I have support and received compliment for my contributions in this thread. Do you have any?

    If both of you have any decency left, debate me on points raised. Don’t resort to personal insults which I have promised Sdr Lim not to do it again. I also hope the highly efficient moderator is reading and monitoring.

  46. #46 by sotong on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 9:51 am

    Too much pride and arrogance with no/little leadership of responsibility and accountability.

    The hard working and peace loving taxpayers should not put up with with Ministers/MPs whose behaviours are dangerous and damaging to the multi racial and religious society.

  47. #47 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:16 am

    Why am I even engaging with this guy!!

  48. #48 by Bigjoe on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:57 am

    I believe Hissamuddin has done what he did because he wanted to move up UMNO heirarchy and needed to put this issue behind him. But the fact of the matter is he went one step further than he had to. If I were him, I would have admitted my mistake but NOT apologised. Whether he when one step further because he did not see it as better or because he wanted to be bold, it does not really matter.

    The fact of the matter is Hissamuddin has drawn a line that those who aspire to be tommorrow leaders have to put behind the antics of the past. Its a reality that Muhiyiddin who is closer to the highest office seem NOT to have learned. But its also because he has a tougher fight for the next leap in his ambitions – that of No. 1 job.

    UMNO is in a state of flux now ideologically. The debates are for all to see. Hissamuddin has chosen a side so, as far as I am concern, let him be. Its still up to him what the next step should be. Its untenable for him to backtrack. He can hessitate to the detriment of his own ambitions only.

    Whether he realize it or not, Hissamuddin is at the centre of UMNO ideological debate. If he aspire to higher and even more prominent office, he is in position to lead or not. The choice is for him to lose.

  49. #49 by cheng on soo on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:57 am

    How about apology from another UMNO man who said similar thing in 1987, that he want to bath / soak his kris with Chinese blood?

  50. #50 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 11:23 am

    It is clear to all that Hishamuddin wants to put the keris wielding episode behind him but not for the reason that one would have thought.

    In any case we must be thankful to him for the number of times he unsheathed the keris and stabbing into thin air with it, making Malay political hegemony his platform in the run-up to the elections. Without him where would the alternative coalition be today?

You must be logged in to post a comment.