Would appreciate, if he also explain why we need RM2.28 to buy SG$1, when in 1984, it is only RM1.09, and in 1975, only RM0.99

Do I sense a certain frustration from your writings ? Chill out bro, this is after all a forum to debate ideas or share opinion. Don’t like it, just leave it. Either way, take it easy….

Allow me, for the sake of intellectual interest, answer your emotional outburts…oops, questions.

1. Singapore vs Malaysia quality of life : I stand by my statements. I will explain it in another post.

2. HINDRAF : I can assure you that I know what I am talking about. Didn’t I say that I know these opportunist bunch since the late 90s ? Watch out in Malaysiakini for my letter.

3. Well, what kind of proof that you are looking for ? Would a sworn statements from these leaders that they want lucrative contracts or plum, cushy jobs would be sufficient for you ? I can certainly raise the issue the next time I meet up with them. Or perhaps LKS can also assist me in this, using his good office and connections.

It is funny though about LKS suing for character defamation. If that is applied for what is written here, I very much doubt if there will be anyone left to post in this blog….

“It is your prerogative whether to believe me or otherwise but the comments from people like myself is useful in providing checks and balances and stop this forum from turning into the Land of the Blinds / Land Where The Frogs Live Under A Coconut Shell.”

Checks and balances? Land of the Blinds?

On what grounds do you postulate that you are speaking the truth?

What credibility do you have other than boasting about your so-called grasp of insider knowledge?

I would take your postulations with a truckload of salt due to three reasons:

i) Some of your postulations are falsehoods - witness your statement regarding the average Malaysian’s quality of life being on par with the average Singaporean. Also, you stated that Singapore has a strictly controlled banking environment when in fact it is one of the most liberal in Asia - contrast that with Malaysia.

ii) Your other postulations are merely allegations and opinions meaning any tom, dick and harry with internet access can post his two cents’ worth in cybespace. e.g. your assertion that HINDRAF are a bunch publicity cheapos

iii) The last one is the worst of the lot - namely you insinuate and slander certain persons such as your accusation of DAP leaders looking for lucrative state contracts from Lim Guan Eng in Penang. You can’t provide proof of that and your words could very well end you in the courthouse for character defamation if LKS chooses to do so.

HINDRAF is an organization led by people who are neither ethical nor truthful, despite their claim to have Gandhi as their spiritual guide.

I can assure you that I know the origins of HINDRAF and their leaders’ history since the late 90s. People like Uthaya are first and foremost are publicity seekers who would not hesitate to lie, cheat or break the law to achieve their aims. Their aim never been to help the Indians since their first entry into the world of NGOs.

I had the unfortunate luck of crossing the path with Uthaya even before the Kg Medan incident. And I had followed his cheap antics ever since that. While many of the NGOs were busy helping the Indian poor, people like Uthaya were busy trying to make some cheap publicities for themselves.

The story behind HINDRAF is not as simple as most people think. Many people will be shocked to hear the real history and origins of HINDRAF. Perhaps one day I might write to Malaysiakini about this.

Could you please explain where / which seat UMNO won because of irregularities in postal votes ? And if that is true, why there is no PR candidate sue the EC ?

This is the same story like the one going around about Khairy’s victory at Rembau, without factual basis.