Renewal of Makkal Osai welcomed – now for immediate release of Hindraf 5


The government’s about-turn to renew the publishing permit of Tamil daily Makkal Osai which it banned last week is welcome as it would have otherwise destroyed the credibility of all reform pledges of Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi on the judiciary and the anti-corruption agency.

The Home Minister, Datuk Seri Hamid Albar should learn the lesson of the Makkal Osai faux pax and not repeat the same mistake of complying obediently and blindly the dictates of the “Little Napoleons” in the bureaucracy and to bring to bear his higher duties and responsibilities as the Minister ultimately responsible for all decisions made by his ministry.

Now, it is for Hamid to order the immediate and unconditional release of the Hindraf 5 from Internal Security Act (ISA) detention in Kamunting.

Hamid cannot again pass the responsibility of the continued detention of the Hindraf 5 to the civil servants as he must bear full and final responsibility for the government’s refusal to heed the voices of the people in the March 8 “political tsunami” that the Malaysian Indians have legitimate grievances about their long-standing marginalization of their citizenship rights in the country, and the Hindraf 5 should be rewarded instead of being incarcerated for bringing the plight of the Malaysian Indians finally to the attention of the government and nation.

Yesterday, Suhakam Commissioner Datuk N. Siva Subramaniam denied allegations that Hindraf leader P. Uthayakumar had been denied proper medical care while in detention. What is most surprising is that Siva had only met representatives from various government quarters including Taiping Hospital, the police and the Kamunting detention centre but not Uthayakumar himself and it is most inadvisable on his part to venture such a bold judgment based solely on one-sided accounts.

Siva should have met Uthayakumar first before passing any judgment. Did he ask to meet Uthayakumar or was he denied access to the ISA detainee? If the latter, he should have told the authorities that he would not be able to offer any public judgment of the treatment of ISA detainees unless Suhakam is allowed free and unfettered access to them!

In Parliament, it had been customary in the past for Ministers, Deputy Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries to blame civil servants for wrong or misleading answers – something completely unheard-of in first-world Parliaments and countries.

All the Ministers in the second Abdullah Cabinet must adopt a new mindset and culture of responsibility and should understand and accept that the buck of responsibility ends with them and that they cannot claim that they were only acting on the advice of the “Little Napoleons” in their ministries and departments.

Ministers and Deputy Ministers must master the subjects under their portfolio which they have to address in Parliament, whether during question time or debates, and they must bear full responsibility for every word uttered in Parliament. Civil servants cannot provide safety nets for Ministers and Deputy Ministers who made a fool of themselves in Parliament when giving wrong, misleading or even stupid answers.

In the new Parliament starting next week, Ministers and Deputy Ministers should accept that they have no safety nets when giving replies prepared by their civil servants as they do not have the luxury of blaming their civil servants for any mistake or misinformation for what they say in Parliament.

Ministers and Deputy Ministers are not “postmen” or “postwomen” of their civil servants when speaking in Parliament.

“Passing the buck” to blame civil servants for wrong or misleading answers given in Parliament should be a thing of the past as it is no more acceptable as higher standards are expected of the new Cabinet in the 12th Parliament.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by yhsiew on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 2:35 pm

    I believe Hamit Elba was under intense pressure to renew the publishing permit of Tamil daily Makkal Osai. Hamit Elba is not a person who would change his mind easily; it is hard to fathom what was the force behind him that caused him to change his mind.

    Unfortunately there was no “effect and influential” third party to pressure him to release the Hindraf 5.

  2. #2 by seage on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 2:48 pm

    Today at 11: 25.41 (3 hours ago)
    last post.

    namastes or warnegum ( forgive my spelling ) dear seage.

    just help the rest of those in kamunting please. everyone of us are also human being. your blood is red, so is mine.
    thank you.

    GOD BE THE JUDGE. I FEAR GOD ONLY. [ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH ]

    Dear Adam, yes, I agree that everyone of us are also human being and your blood is red, so is mine… and for that, so are those that is responsible for Bali Bombing, 911, London subway bombing and madrid bombing.

    So what’s the point that you are trying to put through?

  3. #3 by NotProudToBeMalaysian on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 2:59 pm

    ilovedap,

    To release those Hindraf 5 and other ISA detainees would be impossible as long as Pak Lah is around.
    If he’s to do that, others will think that he’s giving in to the opposition.
    Just look at the Mahkota Cheras issue, for example.
    He’s not going to give in easily, especially to the DAP.
    To another question, as long as Umno rules, I’ll always stick to my present name in this blog for good.
    With the present ruling government, are you telling me that you’re real proud to be one?

  4. #4 by maxplus on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 3:45 pm

    Release all the 60 above ISA detainees. If you think that they have committed an offence; give them a fair trial; and with good lawyers and constitutionally appointed judges; not by Mr Korek Korek Korek

  5. #5 by Tim Sng on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 6:14 pm

    Thanks Dato’ Syed Hamid and your boss, the PM.

    Good to let them free to write and publish again. This is a positive development for BN’s Home Affairs machinery.

    I was getting worried when Dato Syed took the less positive stance.

  6. #6 by undergrad2 on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 6:24 pm

    To side track a little -

    “There is definitely not a shortage of rice in US and Canada.” Jong

    The shortage may not be actual but the price has almost doubled over the course of one year! We are also being told on TV that there’s no shortage!

    We can all speculate as to the reason but it’s not going to make a difference as prices keep rising and real income shrinks. Rice in the U.S. is grown and mostly comes from California. The rest is imported from India, Vietnam and Thailand.

    I suppose the U.S. government doesn’t put too much emphasis right now because Asians only make up some 3-4% and the Hispanic population some 24% of the total population.

  7. #7 by limkamput on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 7:43 pm

    Who say it is not going to make a difference if we know the cause of the price increase. If the prices of essential commodities are excessively manipulated by greedy speculators, i think we just have to shoot them all. If will make the difference to the prices.

  8. #8 by undergrad2 on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 9:26 pm

    Now didn’t the great Confucious once say “Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed”?

  9. #9 by Jong on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 9:43 pm

    Too bad, my comment is under moderation. I think I know why – sensitive words! Will think of a way to get round it.

  10. #10 by Jong on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 9:46 pm

    Rice – Exactly, it’s due to greedy “futures” speculators, that’s what it is. Call it “fixed”! Knew it was coming, they were already talking some 6 months back.

    How do you plan to shoot them down limkamput, seek Najib’s help to blast them with …?

    The only way is to play ‘tai-chi’ with them, keep off rice, eat more pasta and potatoes. US rice are just as good, if not better. So when there’s no demand for Asian rice, it will wreck those speculators. How long do you think they can last, huh?

  11. #11 by Jong on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 9:48 pm

    Nope it doesn’t help. Too bad, have to wait.

  12. #12 by Jong on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 10:04 pm

    Rice – Exactly, it’s due to greedy “futures” speculators, that’s what it is. Call it “fixed”! Knew it was coming, they were already talking some 6 months back.

    How do you plan to shoot them down limkamput, seek Najis’s help to blast them with …C.?

    The only way is to play ‘tai-chi’ with them, keep off rice, eat more pasta and potatoes. US rice are just as good, if not better. So when there’s no demand for Asian rice, it will wreck those speculators. How long do you think they can last, huh?

  13. #13 by Jong on Friday, 25 April 2008 - 10:05 pm

    At last, got it through with minor adjustment!

  14. #14 by limkamput on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 12:00 am

    Jong, that was what I suggested we should do (and I think anybody with some grey matter in his/her head will know I am saying in jest and perhaps in frustration) although one annoying “know all” character may label me stupid again. The problem with him is he knows not what he does not know and yet think others know less than him.

  15. #15 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 12:40 am

    But then who can disagree with the great Confucious who says, “Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed”?

  16. #16 by Jong on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 1:00 am

    But how many will agree to change their diet and opt for bread, potatoes and pasta instead? At the rate the price of rice is climbing, it won’t be that cheap to eat rice anymore, so it’s good opportunity and timely for a world wide awareness campaign to discourage rice intake.

  17. #17 by Jong on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 1:10 am

    I think we have enough of rice here! Let’s move on.

  18. #18 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 3:20 am

    Secretary Rice??

  19. #19 by ktteokt on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 7:48 am

    First it was sugar, then cooking oil and now it’s rice! All these are nothing but political games played by those in power to control the people of the nation. Since when people of Malaysia began consuming more sugar, more cooking oil or rice? If the demand has basically not increased and production has been consistent, why is there suddenly a shortage in supply????

  20. #20 by Jong on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 9:24 am

    To make more money!

  21. #21 by Jong on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 10:08 am

    The world is now totally at the mercy of rice exporting countries aided by “futures” speculators. The sudden supply disruption and low stockpiles sent almost all rice consuming countries scrambling to find supplies. This helped produced price swings.

    Then emerged the oil producing Arab countries whose sudden ‘demand’ for rice at almost any price, increased the momentum! See the picture?

    Time to change our diet, too much carb in rice, go for the lesser evil!

  22. #22 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 10:17 am

    Don’t know about you but I think Secretary Rice has the answer.

  23. #23 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 10:35 am

    The prices of rice and wheat are linked.

    In the United States, wheat futures in Kansas City, Chicago and Minneapolis have surged to record highs on forecasts of tighter supplies and continued strong demand at home and abroad.

  24. #24 by limkamput on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 11:01 am

    I am just puzzled. How many additional bowls of rice or load of bread can a person eat? I think instead of invading oil and food producing countries, what the US should do now is to round up and detain all the hedge fund managers, future traders and speculators in Guantanamo Bay indefinitely. Trust me, it will work. The world would be a better place without them, despite whatever they may say. They have never produced any damn thing – not even a grain of rice, and yet they are there to enjoy French wine and caviare everyday. They are worse than BN.

  25. #25 by Jong on Saturday, 26 April 2008 - 1:54 pm

    Yeah, round them all up and bring them to Malaysia and with the right connections it won’t be that difficult to get C… and blast them all to bits!
    As for immigration records, not problem just get them erased, again with the right connection. :D

  26. #26 by Killer on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 1:24 am

    I am of the opinion that the HINDRAF 5 should be released BUT charged in court for sedition. Let them defend their outrageous statements and actions in an open court and let the law take its due course.

    However, most people here are completely wrong on the reason why Pak Lah detained the 5 under ISA. The reason for this is that there were fears that this steet protest will invite counter protests from the Malays and turn bloody. In fact before their arrests some HINDRAF folks were planning to demonstrate in Kg Baru.

    In fact, things were so heated up that the situation up North in Penang almost turned into another Kg Rawa/Kg Medan incident with open fights between Indians and Malays. Though the original cause was just a traffic accident, the whole matter turned racial with people being killed.

    In fact both groups planned to attack each other and mobilising hundreds of people when the police moved in and arrested the key leaders to defuse the situation. There were some reports of this incident but it was downplayed and the severity of the situation was never reported.

  27. #27 by Killer on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 1:28 am

    I also disagree that Pak Lah’s motivation was political. If he was then he would have arrested many of those who took part in the BERSIH and other demos.

    Also many people here thinks ISA detainees are all political. Under AAB, there are no political prisoners. Most of them are members of KMM and Al Mauna or drug lords / counterfeiters /etc.

  28. #28 by undergrad2 on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 4:47 am

    Detainees alleged to be involved in terrorist activities should be charged and/or released to face trials in open courts. Detainees involved in drug, counterfeiting and other illegal activities and crimes unrelated to terrorism should be charged under the respective Sections of the Penal Code, and released on bail if the offences are bailable, to stand trial.

    I suspect the government cannot release the HINDRAF detainees without coming under pressure to also release the others who have in fact been under detention for a much longer period – especially when the rest of the detainees were mostly Malays.

    It will be seen as discriminatory. It will be seen as a weakness on the part of the federal government.

  29. #29 by Killer on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:37 am

    undergrad2

    I agree with you, that being my personal view too.

    I have spoken to a number of serving and retired police officers and they feel preventive laws such as ISA and Restricted Residence are still relevant and neccessary.

    According to them, the problem is that the evidence the security services have are either insufficient or would result in these agencies’ “methods and sources” to be revealed. Another reason for the application of these laws due to the lack of witnesses who would come forward to give evidence. A ood example would be the Klang Indian gangsters held under RR. Despite many residents’ high profile complaints, apparently none of them were willing to come forward as a witness fearing reprisals.

    Though I personally feel uncomfortable with such laws and the opportunity for abuse, many of these security people I spoke to assured me that everyone under held ISA and RR currently have solid reasons for their detentions.

  30. #30 by Killer on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 9:52 am

    As for HINDRAF 5,I was told that the reasons were more to do with the attitude of the detainees. This has been turned into a melodramatic Bollywood musical.

    The continued claims of mistreatment by the HINDRAF 5, their attitude toward the wardens in Kamunting Hilton and the rowdy activities of their supporters seemed to have hardened the will of the Home Ministry.

    There was a window of opportunity after the 12GE for their release and it would have happened especially after the MIC made an appeal. But then the detainees shot themselves in their foot by making outrageous claims about a lack of medical care and ill-treatment. This was not helped by their supporters’ antics.

    The interesting this is that had MIC not been crushed in the 12GE, the chances of the detainees getting released after Samy Vellu’s appeal would have been much better. Now that MIC had been snubbed and the Indian representation reduced to a junior position in the cabinet, I don’t think the appeals by MIC or other Indian groups would matter.

    The release is inevitable but the timing would be of AAB’s choosing
    to maximize the political mileage.

    Anyway Pakatan Rakyat folks should be cautious as the release of HINDRAF 5 would be more damaging to them than BN in a medium and long term.

  31. #31 by undergrad2 on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 8:03 pm

    We must not forget that we are living in a post 9/11 world. This single incident has changed the world and countries all over the world have passed similar legislation but with safeguards against their possible abuse.

    In fact prior to 9/11 the U.S. has been critical of Malaysia and felt we should repeal our ISA. But instead as a result of 9/11 they have taken a leaf from our experience when fighting terrorism, and introduced their own ISA – the U.S. Patriots Act and the Real ID Act.

    But they are important and major differences. They have very strong safeguards against abuse by the President and his powers are in any case temporary and they call for mandatory review by the U.S. Congress. Our ISA has been used to stem political dissent which is wrong! It is never the objective of Parliament when it passed the law for the Act to be used other than combating Communist terrorism. The father of recently deceased Rustam, Ahmad Boestaman had links to Indonesia’s PKI and he was detained by the Brits for eight years and by Tunku for four years. But Ops Lallang detainees are not new converts to Communism which was in its death throes!

    Our courts in the 80s have chosen to give a liberal interpretation to the phrase “threat to national security”. Guess who was the Prime Minister than?? He and Musa Hitam made a toke release of ISA prisoners when they took over the reins and reneged on their promise to do away with it completely.

    To repeal the Act in the post 9/11 is not unlike saying we have to ban automobiles because they can be used as a weapon!

  32. #32 by Killer on Sunday, 27 April 2008 - 10:20 pm

    undergrad2

    An interesting footnote to the Operasi Lalang…some of the people who were detained at that time was due to none other than Anwar Ibrahim himself who used the opportunity to settle political scores…

    Now the Political Transformer sings a different song…

  33. #33 by undergrad2 on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 1:32 am

    Yes, the Pide Piper of Hamelin is now the Pide Piper of Cerok Tok Kun. I’m not sure who took the place of those rats.

  34. #34 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 3:08 am

    Killer, I hope whatever you said was based on facts, which will make you a very knowledgeable insider. Otherwise, please have some respect for those whose freedom have been deprived.

  35. #35 by Jong on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 8:34 am

    Killer, I’ve been reading what you wrote and your exchanges with undergrad2, you sound to me as a BN insider, ..a cyber-trooper sent here? I don’t think it works anymore.

    Umno/BN spent millions of ringgit in propaganda and advert in mainstream media yet they lost 5 states. If not for those postal and buying of votes, we would have buried BN and Umno.

  36. #36 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:04 am

    Jong precisely, and assisted by gullible fools who are consumed by big fat ego! Let me see, never ending post 9/11, constitutionality and what else, oh quotations from sage that he knows nothing about!

  37. #37 by Jong on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:52 am

    Sometimes its good you need to ‘feign a pig to eat the tiger’, just lead him on and let him do the talking. Obviously we are all not “dungus”!

  38. #38 by Killer on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 10:39 pm

    Well guys, whatever I had said here is in public domain if you cared to read your news and open your mind.

    It is your prerogative whether to believe me or otherwise but the comments from people like myself is useful in providing checks and balances and stop this forum from turning into the Land of the Blinds / Land Where The Frogs Live Under A Coconut Shell.

  39. #39 by limkamput on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 11:31 pm

    Killer, please don’t be so condescending. We know enough to know the difference. We also don’t write long long story. Go read my comments on your “investment rules” in another thread.

  40. #40 by cheng on soo on Monday, 28 April 2008 - 11:40 pm

    Someone said, “In fact before their arrests some HINDRAF folks were planning to demonstrate in Kg Baru.”
    Don’t see why Hindraf folks are so crazy to want to demonstrate in Kg Baru, NO OTHER PLACE IS IT?
    Hindraf demo against Msia Govt policies, NOT AGAINST MALAY!

  41. #41 by Killer on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 12:15 am

    Jong

    Could you please explain where / which seat UMNO won because of irregularities in postal votes ? And if that is true, why there is no PR candidate sue the EC ?

    This is the same story like the one going around about Khairy’s victory at Rembau, without factual basis.

  42. #42 by Killer on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 12:31 am

    cheng on soo

    HINDRAF is an organization led by people who are neither ethical nor truthful, despite their claim to have Gandhi as their spiritual guide.

    I can assure you that I know the origins of HINDRAF and their leaders’ history since the late 90s. People like Uthaya are first and foremost are publicity seekers who would not hesitate to lie, cheat or break the law to achieve their aims. Their aim never been to help the Indians since their first entry into the world of NGOs.

    I had the unfortunate luck of crossing the path with Uthaya even before the Kg Medan incident. And I had followed his cheap antics ever since that. While many of the NGOs were busy helping the Indian poor, people like Uthaya were busy trying to make some cheap publicities for themselves.

    The story behind HINDRAF is not as simple as most people think. Many people will be shocked to hear the real history and origins of HINDRAF. Perhaps one day I might write to Malaysiakini about this.

  43. #43 by limkamput on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 3:18 am

    Killer, please do it now, why one day you MIGHT write to Malaysiakini? Why MIGHT, you mean you are not sure of the fact or you are not sure you want to write.

  44. #44 by lchk on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 12:23 pm

    Killer posted:

    “It is your prerogative whether to believe me or otherwise but the comments from people like myself is useful in providing checks and balances and stop this forum from turning into the Land of the Blinds / Land Where The Frogs Live Under A Coconut Shell.”

    Checks and balances? Land of the Blinds?

    On what grounds do you postulate that you are speaking the truth?

    What credibility do you have other than boasting about your so-called grasp of insider knowledge?

    I would take your postulations with a truckload of salt due to three reasons:

    i) Some of your postulations are falsehoods – witness your statement regarding the average Malaysian’s quality of life being on par with the average Singaporean. Also, you stated that Singapore has a strictly controlled banking environment when in fact it is one of the most liberal in Asia – contrast that with Malaysia.

    ii) Your other postulations are merely allegations and opinions meaning any tom, dick and harry with internet access can post his two cents’ worth in cybespace. e.g. your assertion that HINDRAF are a bunch publicity cheapos

    iii) The last one is the worst of the lot – namely you insinuate and slander certain persons such as your accusation of DAP leaders looking for lucrative state contracts from Lim Guan Eng in Penang. You can’t provide proof of that and your words could very well end you in the courthouse for character defamation if LKS chooses to do so.

  45. #45 by Killer on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 2:14 pm

    lchk

    Do I sense a certain frustration from your writings ? Chill out bro, this is after all a forum to debate ideas or share opinion. Don’t like it, just leave it. Either way, take it easy….

    Allow me, for the sake of intellectual interest, answer your emotional outburts…oops, questions.

    1. Singapore vs Malaysia quality of life : I stand by my statements. I will explain it in another post.

    2. HINDRAF : I can assure you that I know what I am talking about. Didn’t I say that I know these opportunist bunch since the late 90s ? Watch out in Malaysiakini for my letter.

    3. Well, what kind of proof that you are looking for ? Would a sworn statements from these leaders that they want lucrative contracts or plum, cushy jobs would be sufficient for you ? I can certainly raise the issue the next time I meet up with them. Or perhaps LKS can also assist me in this, using his good office and connections.

    It is funny though about LKS suing for character defamation. If that is applied for what is written here, I very much doubt if there will be anyone left to post in this blog….

  46. #46 by lakilompat on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 4:42 pm

    Land of the Blinds: Land of the Silenced.

  47. #47 by cheng on soo on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 - 5:05 pm

    Someone said, “Singapore vs Malaysia quality of life : I stand by my statements. I will explain it in another post.”

    Would appreciate, if he also explain why we need RM2.28 to buy SG$1, when in 1984, it is only RM1.09, and in 1975, only RM0.99

Comments are closed.