“This was clearly putting the cart before the horse as it is the Prime Minister and Cabinet who should take the policy decision”

Very simple. The corruption is reach a serious deterioting stage that possibly all government top-gun might have to face the court if those ACA cases to be revisited.

The judicial system that created by TM in the past is obviously absurd and it is obviously encourage the corruption to breed.

First , prosecution of a corruption will be stop by the PM if it related to his interest.

Second, in the event prosecution to be proceed like ” Correct,correct story”, then the case will be delay or claim as no case.

At the end… the result is no case.

Like the one of Bank advertisement ” The merz is at my house. I see… not you see ”

This is ” NO CASE AT ALL? No even mention how to improve”.

The ACA and the PM can say whatever they like. Provided that action taken to proof themselve, it is same as ” Wayang Kulit”.

1) Second bridge delay due to costs and design issues
Who will be interested to come Penang to invest if the Federal Govt. failed to delivery 1st class infrastructure looking at current situation? Penang belong to opposition state.

2) KL-Singapore bullet train derailed by high cost
The future investment has been stop, now, any foreigner will be interested to come Malaysia? KL belong to opposition state.

Are opposition just going to sit there and ask question, without any action?

If they let out the bullets into public domain, surely the ACA, newly-empowered-independent body MUST ACT !!

Parliament dissolved, elections on

So, how trustworthy this guy is? This guy has the habit of telling lies.

You do not need to be legally qualified, understand legal jargon or be literate in the meaning and use of legal terminology to qualify and serve as jurors. In fact lawyers are not qualified to serve as jurors. You must be tried by a jury of your peers who are ordinary folks.

Jurisdictions which follow jury trials and non-jury trials (sometimes there is a choice, others mandatory), the only qualification is your age which is 18 and whether you are a citizen.

Members of law enforcement agencies are not qualified to serve as jurors to prevent bias or the appearance of bias.

The system of preemptory challenges is to ensure that you get jurors who are not biased against you. However, gender and race are not grounds and challenges cannot be mounted on grounds of race and gender. But of course there are ways since you do not have to assign reasons for some of the preemptory challenges.

as stated, there is a double meaning to it.

1. he is being sacarstic that dsai will be teaming up with foreigners, and manage the country. i think this is the insinuation.

2.he cannot trust any malaysians. which of course is regretted.

thank you.

The judges who convicted Anwar of sodomy/corruption were NOT foreigners. The judges in the Altantuya case are also NOT foreigners. So why is the mamak demanding to be judged by foreigners?

“His days are numbered”

……Like everyone else. He is going to be gone probably within a year and maybe it’s the last chance to do a few good things before he leaves office.

Maybe at this juncture we should look at how the PM is selected as UMNO may not be the determinant party anymore.
There is some logic that UMNO is leader in BN and therefore the PM comes from UMNO. Maybe BN parties should re-look at this logic.

however, the former premier said he hoped that those who sit on the board of inquiry would be nuetral, impartial and PROBABLY FOREIGNERS. ( PUN INTENDED ).

arbitration doesnt work all times. that’s why we have the courts and lawyers. ( sigh !)

anyway, i respect you sir.

[All posts arising from allasstra's personal comments have been deleted. Such personal exchanges are not welcome on this blog. - Admin]