It has become the practice for Cabinet Ministers to pre-empt questions which MPs have given notice in the forthcoming parliamentary meeting by giving answers before the questions are actually asked on the dates they are listed.
The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, has proved that he is no exception and is beginning to answer my first question for question time in the 12th Parliament beginning next Wednesday, which asked him “to outline the top ten priority reform measures which his government will implement in the next 12 months to demonstrate that he has heard the voices of the people in the March 8, 2008 ‘political tsunami’”.
This morning, Abdullah announced that the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) will be made a full-fledged commission by year-end and will be answerable to Parliament.
He said said this was one of the four key reform initiatives that would be carried out by the government in the move to address the public concerns on corruption in the country.
The commission’s workforce would be increased to 5,000 officers over a period of five years and the government would also introduce legislation to provide a comprehensive protection for whistle blowers and witnesess in corruption cases.
Furthermore, the government would also take immediate steps to improve the public procurement process through measures targeted at addressing specific problems in the system.
Last Thursday, Abdullah announced measures towards judicial reforms, viz:
• Ex-gratia payment for “the pain and loss” suffered by the late Tan Sri Eusoffe Abdoolcader and Tan Sri Wan Suleiman Pawanteh and their families, Tun Salleh Abas, Tan Sri Azmi Kamaruddin, Tan Sri Wan Hamzah Mohamed Salleh and Datuk George Seah in the 1988 Judicial Crisis.
• A Judicial Appointments Commission;
• Review of the judiciary’s terms of service and remuneration to ensure that the Bench can attract and retain the very best of the nation’s talent.
As the “proof of the pudding is in the eating”, more details are needed before an informed judgment can be made of the reform measures concerned.
Although belated, reform measures to restore public confidence in the efficacy, efficiency, independence, impartiality and credibility of national institutions whether judiciary or the anti-corruption agency are welcome as they have been long-awaited by the people.
Yesterday, I had told some reporters that I was astonished at the Prime Minister’s confirmation that he was studying a proposal by the ACA for it to become more independent.
This was clearly putting the cart before the horse as it is the Prime Minister and Cabinet who should take the policy decision that they have heard the voices of the people in the March 8 “political tsunami” and want an anti-corruption agency which is completely independent of the government, answerable only to Parliament , followed by directives to the various agencies such as the ACA and the Attorney-General’s Chambers to draft the necessary legislation based on best international practices like the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to implement such a policy decision.
The government’s failure in the fight against corruption in the past four years, highlighted by the ACA’s inability to net a single one of the 18 “sharks” targetted at the beginning of the Abdullah premiership and the six-point plunge in the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index rankings from No. 37 in 2003 to No. 43 last year, is an undeniable and indisputable fact.
I am glad that 24 hours after my comment, the Prime Minister has committed himself to a policy position on an independent anti-corruption agency.
Malaysians will not want a new anti-corruption commission which purports to be independent in name only but not in fact in spearheading the fight against corruption to restore integrity in the nation’s public life – becoming a second Suhakam which is tasked to be an independent body to protect and promote human rights but is completely unable to do so without the necessary powers and wherewithal to carry out such a human rights mandate.
Furthermore, is Abdullah prepared to fully respond to the March 8 “political tsunami” and initiate far-reaching national reforms including the establishment of the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) by tabling such a bill in the first meeting of Parliament and to free the Malaysian mass media from the shackles of the Printing Presses and Publications Act?

#1 by justice_fighter on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:28 pm
Making the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) independent is not enough, Pak Lah should also give them power to prosecute directly without seeking consent from the AG. If Pak Lah can make the ACA as effective and transparent as Hong Kong’s ICAC, I’ll convince my whole family to vote BN next round.
#2 by boh-liao on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:39 pm
Do we trust our ACA? AG’s Chambers? PDRM?
No, no, no.
Are they subservient to certain political masters? Do they ensure that everyone is equal under the Malaysian law? Your guess is as good as mine.
Harapkan pagar, pagar makan padi!
#3 by justice_fighter on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:40 pm
Dear uncle kit,
Weeks have passed, can you please help me to ask Ong Tee Kiat when is he going to announce the full details of PKFZ?
Come on Ong Tee Kiat, show us some efficiency, your sleepy Boss has improved more than you on this.
#4 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:46 pm
Is this meant all the while it has not been independent?
Real stupid! How could a govt. leader slapping his own face. Also noticed, they compensate to the judges but does not agreed to apologize?
#5 by Bigjoe on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:49 pm
For 4 years, he moved like a snail. Suddenly he want to do everything at once? Is he biting off more than he can chew?
If he moves too fast, I think he will find himself fired from his job! AND nothing really gets done….
#6 by HJ Angus on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:50 pm
I think this is a good move and reflects some serious intent of the PM. Hopefully, it is not too late for his survival. They should not be under the AG’s office.
Here are 2 simple cartoons on the corruption problems:
http://malaysiawatch3.blogspot.com/2007/11/malaysias-hunt-for-corrupt-projects.html
http://malaysiawatch3.blogspot.com/2007/10/getting-more-bang-for-our-bucks.html
#7 by kanthanboy on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 1:57 pm
//I’ll convince my whole family to vote BN next round…//
I don’t have such a big forgiving heart like justice fighter. Has he/she forgotten those who are still being locked up in Kamunting Camp under the draconian ISA? Shouldn’t the ACA be effective and transparent to begin with? If I rebuilt what I destroyed, I prove that I am only a lawbreaker.
#8 by Jeffrey on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 2:00 pm
It is real good move for rakyat Pak Lah – an independent ACA accountable to a Parliament split in power almost equally between Opposition and ruling coalition – shortly in the wake of judicial reforms announced……
An independent Judiciary & ACA – are bulwark against corruption any society.
At this juncture, it also a good move for getting Rakyat’s support against those political rivals sympathetic to TDM’s cause within the ruling coalition out to depose him : because if they could oust him, all institutional reforms initiated by Pak Lah (albeit belatedly) to take the country out of the woods will be cast a huge shadow of doubt of further proceeding to fruition.
It is good move for Pak Lah to cramp-push the reform agenda in light of tight time framework with which you have to operate. If you have to go down fighting the conservative and rightist elements within the ruling coalition opposed to reforms, at least he would redeem some of goodwill lost in the first four years immobilized by fears of opposition from these elements.
#9 by disapointed86 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 2:04 pm
pls la…he only take action after the tsunami…its too late….prevention is better than cure……only after 4 years he trying to do smth..
#10 by Jeffrey on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 2:08 pm
All these years Kit and the rest of us have been clamoring for an independent ACA accountable to Parliament (instead of PM), and now Pak Lah says, “yes we will do it” and then he gets scolded or ridiculed (“govt leader slapping his own face”) for this. It seems he can do no right! I think a little encouragement if not appreciation is more appropriate under the circumstances.
#11 by k1980 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 2:09 pm
His next “reform” might be to make himself “PM-Hadhari-for-life”, in the footsteps of the Dalai Lama who made himself “God-King-for-life”
#12 by showsomemercy on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 3:02 pm
What’s the point of having it independent? In the end the ACA also have to Kow Tow to the UMNO scum bags.
Like what justice_fighter says, if ACA can prosecute without seeking consent from the AG, then lain cerita but just independent is not enough. Anyway or anyhow, i will still vote opposition
haha! :)
#13 by kenyalan08 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 3:30 pm
Even with the ” reform ” , every decisions and recommendations made by the ACA will hv to be scrutinized and approved by PM b4 actions taken . What happen when PM , himself or members of his family are involved ? I still can’t figure out how a young chap , slightly over 30 yrs old can be multi-billionaire after leaving school .
#14 by Cinapek on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 3:48 pm
Whatever the scepticism, at the very least it is a very big first step. Pak Lah I believe knows he has reached the stage where he is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t. So he has decided to go for broke and defy those UMNO power brokers that has been making it difficult to implement unpopular changes such as these. These UMNO power brokers has vested interest to see that the ACA remains under their thumbs.
But by implementing this huge change to become a commission and answerable to Parliament, it will forever free the ACA from this shackle and allow it to be independent. But there are good reasons for concern on the implementation given this country’s penchant for ruining every good idea with bad implementation. Hence the people and Parliament must act as the watchdog and do whatver it takes to ensure that the changes goes down the right path.
As for the IPCMC, did AAB balked because of the threat from the 90,000 strong PDRM that they will vote Opposition if AAB went ahead with the IPCMC? Well the people have spoken with an even louder voice than the 90,000 PDRM. AAB, if you have big ears you would not have failed to hear the people’s voice and should now ignore the PDRM’s oppoisition to the IPCMC and go ahead with its appointment in accordance with the wishes of the people.
#15 by Chong Zhemin on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 3:50 pm
Did I read wrongly??
Is pak lah serious in reforming ACA into MCA(Malaysian Commission on Anti-Corruption)???
#16 by gofortruth on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 3:54 pm
“proof of the pudding is in the eating”- Kit
——————
How aptly said. Lets hope the additional work force are not “exclusively” employed to hunt & creat havoc for PR leaders.
Lets see what happens to Lingam case first then we talk lah.
#17 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:13 pm
I bet prior to making such announcement, Kamaludin and Khairy has sold their shares and avoid business conflicts.
#18 by sheriff singh on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:19 pm
And please give the MCAC the powers to look into and review all previous cases that has some how disappeared into the black hole.
For a start, perhaps foreigners with no vested interests, might be employed to help look into all the cases, past and present, like an independent Oversight Committee. It has been done before e.g. in Danaharta.
#19 by Loh on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:24 pm
///This morning, Abdullah announced that the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) will be made a full-fledged commission by year-end and will be answerable to Parliament.///
We won’t know who would be the PM by year-end. If PM AAB was honest when he said that there were more pressing issue than this to be tackled during his first term, then he had got his priority wrong. It would appear that he knows his time is up, and that he is getting all the necessary changes initiated, to be stopped by his successor, if he leaves sooner.
Unless the componenet parties in BN had a say on who they would support as PM, if they were not afraid to be ISAed, PM AAB does not stand a chance to stay till year-end. Good luck to him for his efforts, irrespective of his intention.
#20 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:29 pm
In Malaysia is the cases are too old, they will said, they forgot, or too complicated to review case. This is how soon, the Atlantuya case will take another 5 yrs or 10 yrs, then end up, Mr. Razak came out a free man.
#21 by justice_fighter on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:45 pm
I have some questions to Pak Lah:
1. why wait until year end? why not next month? In year end you will be too busy with UMNO election and you may not be the PM anymore, then all of us will be fooled again!
2. what are the criteria to choose the head and staff of MCAC?
3. what do you mean by “full-fledged commission”? Does it mean MCAC can prosecute your family members including you if you are found to be corrupt?
#22 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:45 pm
Even if full independence, their monthly pocket money who going to subsidize them?
#23 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:47 pm
1. why wait until year end?
UMNO crisis
why not next month? In year end you will be too busy with UMNO election and you may not be the PM anymore, then all of us will be fooled again!
If can drag just drag.
2. what are the criteria to choose the head and staff of MCAC?
Don’t ask me, I’m not the PAPA MCAC.
3. what do you mean by “full-fledged commission”? Does it mean MCAC can prosecute your family members including you if you are found to be corrupt?
Everyone ok except my family, stay away from them, well since i’m not going to stay on power for long, i don’t really care.
#24 by bluesky on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:49 pm
You think Pak Lah is serious abt it? Or just buy times?
#25 by JDoe on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:51 pm
lakilompat,
“This is how soon, the Atlantuya case will take another 5 yrs or 10 yrs, then end up, Mr. Razak came out a free man.”
Which Mr.Razak were you refering to?
#26 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:51 pm
YB LIM.
ONCE BITTEN TWICE SHY. TWICE BITTEN NEVER TRY.
until we get it signed and sealed and passed in parliament and approved by DYMM, i will wait and see.
i will wait and see, the deliberations and further deliberations by the attorney general office, the protection of whistle blowers, the inabililty of the income tax department to determine the sources of wealth , i will just wait and see.
IP 7305. reported in year 2005. when abdullah badawi was hoo haa about fighting corruption. i will just wait and see.
abdullah can promise a lot but ,i just wait and see.
the de facto law minister must convene a meeting with stakeholders, and than the constitution minister must make sure, that the corrupted rights are NOT INFRINGED. than the bpr ( badan penuh rasuah ) will investigate, and than refer to ag to decide on OTC ( order to charge ) . than incomplete investigations, than return to I.O for further actions, than we all forget.
than whatever changes will be watered down and wait till the next tsunami before any one is really charged. and than because of lack of evidence, or evidences are traced to japan or austria,and we need our foreign minister to sign a treaty to exchange confidential informations , the corrupted can afford bail of even rm 100 million, and than even datuk zainal abidin yusof – head of dpp , also cannot convince the yang arif that prima facie established.
the whole story is, YB LIM , why DO you get excited so easily by abdullah’s preempt. remember on the 12th of february , and the 13th of february, we sure were taken for a ride .
wait and see. i dont feel good. i feel negative.
#27 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:56 pm
YB lim, you stated that 5000 officers will be recruited over 5 years.
very good. maybe 1000 are chinese. 1000 indians. 1000 kadazans.
1000 ibans. 1000 malays. ( + /- 30 % variance ).
why not, if merits are considered.
#28 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 4:59 pm
lakilompat.
you make sense.
why end of the year. when he may no longer be the pm.
YB LIM, are you in good mood today.?
the implementation must be by MAY. and with the numbers of pakatan raayat mps in parliament and if bn is dead serious, it can be done sooner than later.
no immunity please to vvips.
#29 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:01 pm
justice fighter.
you are right too. why end of the year.??????????
YANG BERHORMAT.
TIME IS CRUCIAL IN ENSURING NO EVIDENCE IS DESTROYED.
#30 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:03 pm
DEAR SHERIFF SINGH.
what happened to danaharta. no more harta?
#31 by Anti_NEP on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:06 pm
If the ACA is really independent like Hong Kong ICAC then i think 90% of the police force will be in jail and 100% of Umnoputera will also be in jail. Will the sleepy pm brave enough to do so?
#32 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:16 pm
YB LIM,
YB LIM.
do we have to wait for the new look bpr before pkftz 4.6billion be investigated. i bet you one roti canai and two kopi o, that abdullah badawi, will say let the new look, ( new uniform too) to investigate the pkfts scandals. THIS IS TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO INTERFERENCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT, than that answers your questions on pkftz in parliament. who said abdullah badawi is not smart.
SIR JEFFREY.YOU ARE HIRED. how to contact you.?
#33 by mata_kucing on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:17 pm
Kit, it doesn’t really matter if Abdullah pre-empted your questions as long as he does something effective to comply to our wishes. In a sense, you can pat yourself on the shoulder that he is reacting to your demand. Continue to ply the pressure on him and his government on all issues affecting us. Don’t lose the momentum that PR has started. People are slowly relising that a strong opposition is very necessary in a democratic system, contrary to what the government had been spinning all along.
#34 by disapointed86 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:21 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS3FMemnA-s
#35 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:25 pm
That Ong Tee Keat is a liar, he said wanted to reveal the RM 4.6 billionth, now what, his brother is having troubled sleeping night?
Who still remember Sheik Muzzaphar, he said he will revealed the results of his experiment in space? what has he revealed to rakyat?
Don’t trust these big time liar. Trust urself and ur family much better than them.
#36 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:29 pm
YB LIM.
can we get the new aca ( with new uniform ) to reopen the case against certain vip, that have led to our poor YAB LIM GUAN ENG served jail sentence years back.
#37 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:38 pm
ADAM, dun spoiled them lar, else they will waste taxpayers money again.
#38 by novice101 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:40 pm
If the opposition’s questions pressurised the government to act, then the oppostion should keep on the pressure. Keep sending them questions. That is the reason why the opposition MPS must not be deliquent in this area. They must be diligent in submitting the questions.
#39 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:47 pm
novice101, i will want to spank those who did not practice their dillengency, even though some are professor or lawyer, without practicising dilligently, they are only “Cakap Besar” MPs. YB LKS and YB LGE don’t spoil them too much.
#40 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:52 pm
OK lakilompat. iam sorry.i apologise.
BUT maybe wear a badge that reads ” rasuah is haram “.i can sponsor the badges la. cannot – rasuah again.
i am being cynical. i am cynical.
#41 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:53 pm
“parliamary”??
#42 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:58 pm
“This morning, Abdullah announced that the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) will be made a full-fledged commission by year-end and will be answerable to Parliament” Kit
What does “answerable to Parliament” actually mean?
Is there a judicial committee chaired by an opposition leader? The head of the ACA is then placed under oath and faces this committeee in a Q&A?
#43 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:00 pm
Would it be open to the media and televised?
#44 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:02 pm
What does “full fledged” mean? Does it mean it will now have more chairs and tables and more toilet paper?
#45 by Jeffrey on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:03 pm
‘What does “answerable to Parliament” actually mean?’ – Undergrad2
According to malaysiakini, the PM said that the commission [Malaysian Commission on Anti-Corruption] would have to table an annual report and be answerable to a parliamentary committee on the prevention of corruption.
#46 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:08 pm
Who sit on the committee? Who chairs it? Will the head of the ACA be under oath? Will the proceedings be transparent?
#47 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:09 pm
“He said the commission….. would ensure that there would be an effective check and balance.” BERNAMA
Does this mean those under investigation would now need to balance their check books?
#48 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:13 pm
Who investigates the head of the ACA?
#49 by undergrad2 on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:22 pm
“Ex-gratia payment for “the pain and loss” suffered by …”
I strongly suggest the aggrieved parties commence a wrongful dismissal suit against the BN government based on whatever admission made so far – and I think the public admission made so far is enough to form the basis for such a law suit.
General and special damages and punitive damages along with loss of earnings would easily bring the quantum of damages to millions and in double digits too. This figure could well be higher if the services of a QC like Jeffery is sought.
#50 by Jeffrey on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 6:33 pm
“Wrongful dismissal suit against the BN government based on whatever admission made so far” claiming for “general and special damages and punitive damages along with loss of earnings would easily bring the quantum of damages to millions and in double digits too”?
I thought it was your position that you too didn’t believe in making we rakyat pay through our taxes for acts of an authoritarian leader brooking no dissent. And may I add, neither would our aggrieved judges of integrity who are looking more at this juncture for moral vindication than pecuniary recompense.