By Farish A. Noor
As someone who studies the phenomenon of political Islam, I have, understandably, been reading much of the international Muslim press over the past few years. In particular I have focused on the International Islamist media- and by this I am referring to the newspapers, websites, journals and magazines produced by the many Islamist organisations, NGOs, political parties and social movements all over the world.
One factor that comes to mind immediately is how parochial and narrow the worldview of much of the international Islamist media has become. More often than not the reportage of world affairs, particularly by Islamist media in the non-Arab world, is focused more on the goings-on in Muslim societies and Arab-Muslim societies in particular. Reading through the material produced by the Islamist media in Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia for instance one learns more about the developments in Egypt, Turkey, Morocco, the Gulf states and Iran than anywhere else.
This does not mean to imply that the developments in these countries are not important, or that they are of no relevance to the development of Islamist movements in Asia or Africa or even Europe. But one does wonder how Islamists in Asia view the rest of the planet, and whether they realise that so much else is going on beyond the narrow frontiers of the Muslim world.
More troubling is that the view of the West is often shaped by the Islamist lens that they wear, and here again the ethnocentric and religio-centric biases of the Islamist press stands out in bold relief. We are all well acquainted by now with the controversy over the recently-released film Fitna by the Dutch politician Geert Wilders. But how many Islamist papers reported the fact that during the protests against the recent Gulf War more than half a million Berliners came out into the streets of Berlin to protest against the invasion of Iraq? And what about the other civil-society led demonstrations organised in London, Paris, Madrid, Rome, Barcelona?
But perhaps the most troublesome thing about the Islamist media today is the impression it gives of being primarily and solely concerned with the affairs of the Muslim world alone; to the point where the overwhelming majority of the rest of the human race remains neglected and their stories remain untold. Yet if we were to look at the developments in the world since 11 September 2001 it should be clear to us all by now that many of the major geo-political shifts we have seen reflect and mirror many of the developments that we also see in the Muslim world.
Two examples stand out:
The first has to do with the latest scramble to re-colonise Africa in no uncertain terms. If we were to cast our minds back to the late 1990s, some of us may recall that it was even trendy in some Western technocratic circles to mumble the mantra of ‘saving Africa from itself’. Since the publication of Basil Davidson’s ‘The Black Man’s Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-state’ (1993) there was much spurious talk of how post-colonial Africa was a disaster zone and that the nation-state model was not applicable there. The subtext of this constant attack on the performance of the nation-states of Africa (which did not come from Davidson, though) was that Africans were not able to govern themselves and were not culturally or essentially adapted to modern modes of governance. The other subtext was that if Africans could not govern themselves then perhaps the time has come for a new mode of colonialism that would rescue Africa (and by extension Africans) from themselves.
Today what we see is the rush to gather and monopolise the oil and gas fields of Africa in the most blatant manner. Already American, European and Chinese companies are all over the continent, cutting deals with corrupt African despots in order to secure the gas and oil resources of countries like Sierra Leone and Guinea.
Yet why isn’t any of this being reported in the Islamist press? Surely the parallels with the developments in many Muslim countries, that are likewise hostage to the oil industry, are clear? Or is it because many Islamist intellectuals and journalists still think that Africans are not important to deserve such reporting because many parts of Africa (like Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania) are not Muslim?
Another striking example that comes to mind is the politics of Central and Latin America, that has gone unrecorded and unrecognised for so long. Venezuela for instance has been threatened with numerous embargoes, has experienced several attempts at toppling its government and has been cast as a Pariah state by the American government. Yet the country’s President Hugo Chavez has been attempting nothing more than an economic reform project aimed at giving the Venezuelan economy back to its people, complete with land reforms and nationalisation of key industries as was the case in Egypt during the time of Gammel Abdel Nasr.
Surely it should strike many of us as obvious that this is a case of history repeating itself, and the parallels with developments in the Muslim world; from Egypt under Nasr to Iran under Mosaddeq, are obvious too. And surely there is so much that Muslims can learn today by looking at the Venezuelan struggle against hegemony and comparing that to their own geo-political plight under present circumstances. But again, Venezuela seems entirely off the map for the international Islamist press. Why? Is it because Hugo Chavez and the people of Venezuela are not Muslims?
One cannot help but come to such conclusions when the contradictions and blind-spots seem so painfully obvious. But if prejudice and ignorance of the world of the other is the only thing that is stopping Muslims from looking beyond the frontiers of their own community, then perhaps the time has come for them to serious ask themselves what it means to be Muslim in the first place. Surely one of the principle tenets of Islam is the notion of Tauhid – the unitary nature of God and creation – which reminds us of the fundamental unity we share with the entire human race. The editors, writers and journalists who serve the machinery of the international Islamist press should therefore get their respective acts together and begin to look closer at the rest of the world around them. If they do so, they may realise that Muslims today have more in common with their struggling brothers and sisters in Venezuela, Cuba and the African nations that with the rich elite of their own countries.

#1 by calvin_ngan on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 - 5:57 pm
In the Spirit of Open Tender and transparency, it would make more sense if the symbol and flag of ‘Pakatan rakyat’ were to be chosen from a competition open to all malaysian.
What Barisan Alternative lack during the last two election is a common symbol, it would be wise to have one now for the next general election.
#2 by alaneth on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 - 11:35 pm
The various flags/symbol mooted should be put to vote also so the rakyat can choose the best flag…
#3 by alaneth on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 - 11:39 pm
Violence in the name of religion creates wars etc… Communism, suppressing religion has succeeded in controlling the most populous nation in the world.
#4 by kingandcountry on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 5:24 am
Best religion is no religion.
Have an open mind, an open heart and you will seek the truth.
I have encountered many who try to raise their children in particular faiths. Important thing is that children be raised to be independent thinkers, then they will seek out the truth at their own accord
#5 by lakshy on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 5:30 am
Malaysian press’ move to demonize all things Dutch is the knee jerk sort of reaction that makes muslim nations look bad in the first place.
Was the Dutch government and people involved in producing the clip?
Did any nation ban malaysian products when they found JI cells in Malaysia? Should they have banned malaysian products? What about when malaysia used excessive force against its own Bersih and Hindraf demonstrators? What about banning malaysian products because it still uses the draconian ISA to muzzle dissent?
Did any nation ban malaysian products when a malaysian company (related to its leaders) was found supplying parts that were to equip a nuclear reactor/weapon?
Is the Malaysian Press and (hence by extension) the Malaysian Govt calling on other nations to ban imports of Malaysian products?
Lets do things rationally and not behave irrationally lest we be seen as an extremist nation, and cause investments to go elsewhere like Singapore and Thailand!
#6 by lakshy on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 5:34 am
The response to Fitna should be to educate more muslims to truly understand the Quran, not just memorize it. When you understand its contents, you wont react with violence to what others say about yuor religion.
But by extension, do take some effort to understand other religions too!
#7 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 7:45 am
i was not able to make any comments yesterday, and i have also send to YB Lim Kit Siang and YB Betty Chew texts messages. I did manage to speak to YB Betty Chew for which i record appreciation.
the moderator was ineffective.
lakilompat:
how much do you understand about Islam and other great religion of the world, i dont really know. i am sure you are living in a blessed world and i am sure you are happy at where you are now.
you have pick and select parts and pieces from The Holy Book and made your own remarks and prejudiced statement. That in itself shows your lack of intelligence and wisdom to fanthom religion.
maybe you really evolved from monkeys . thats according to charles darwins’ theory and that should be your rights to belief in who you are.
FRIENDS AND BLOGGERS.
please refrain from “attacking” the RELIGION AND THE HOLY BOOK.
if for any reasons , that there are waywards actions, the actions are by the waywards followers.
#8 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 8:01 am
lakilompat :
” quote and unquote you:- THERE IS NO GOD OTHER THAN ALLAH”
may it be known to you that the first commandment of the Holy Bible wrote of there IS ONLY ONE GOD.
SO ARE YOU GOING TO IMPLY THAT THE BIBLE IS ARROGANT, DISCRIMINATING AND BIASED TOWARDS OTHER RELIGION.!!
i texted to YB LIM, and with full respect to YB Lim, we should refrain and restrain this blog as a forum to debate on ANY RELIGION. unless we are wise , honest, and with no sins, enough to respect the religions of others, we are not capable to make disparaging remarks of others’ religion.
i am a great sinner. and lakilompat, i am very confident that my accumulated dosa is more than yours. i am not proud, but i keep praying to bertaubat.
please , lakilompat , i pray that you find peace in your way of life , as muslims too find peace in their ways of life. if any muslims would have offended you, like myself, i mohon maaf.
thank you.
btw YB LIM. God bless you and family too. YAB LIM GUAN ENG attended the gathering of muslims ( birthday of Nabi Mohammad pbuh and with christians ( Good friday ). thank you YAB LGE.
#9 by lakilompat on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 12:56 pm
There won’t be peace if religion are blended into constitution.
#10 by shortie kiasu on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 1:39 pm
How do the writer propose to change the Islamist world effectively, when a novel can cause a “death” sentence to the author, a cartoon can cause so much of rumbling and violence against the artist, and now a short film can cause the boycott of goods from the country of the film director by the Islamist world?
#11 by lakilompat on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 2:53 pm
Problem is if ppl r reluctant to change the forces of evil will find its way to destroy the good lies within the holy bible al Quran.
#12 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 4:28 pm
thank you lakilompat. it is the people that are making a BAD representation of GREAT RELIGIONS.
unfortunately, there is the devil and the angel in each of us. it is which role we wanted . many have sell their souls to devil.
that is why,i pleaded with YB LIM and even your goodself to refrain from RELIGION IN A POLTICAL BLOG.
thanks again lakilompat. if i have in any manner offended you, i apologise. BUT I am proud of you that you are able to see beyond .mohon maaf.
#13 by lakilompat on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 5:06 pm
Put a loaf of bread on a table, see what will happen to it after 1 wk or 1 month. Now try renewing a new loaf of bread every day then observe it after 1 wk or 1 month. If you did not replace the bread it will destroyed itself by bacteria. It is the same with ideas, a loaf of bread is like a fresh ideas or interpretation of minds during that time, as we moved on, this interpretation require wise ppl to harness it and change. You will be able to observe simple theory that everything looks fresh and good today might not serve tomorrow. A book is still a book if it is interpret wrongly it must be corrected, as it will affect ppl. to fight and dispute for wrong course.
Eg. pray 5 times a day, during the ancient time it is permissable as most of the peasant work hard on the field, they will also need 5 times to rest & pray for better harvest. In today world Will this make Muslim less competitive labourer compare to Thais, Indonesian, Burmese? or those oil rich company.
#14 by mysn1st on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 - 5:45 pm
Prof Farish,
In short, Selfish is the answer to your question.
#15 by lakilompat on Thursday, 3 April 2008 - 8:54 am
This prayer of 5 times a day is made during war time, as when war break out during ancient times, the soldiers need foods, inorder to reduce stress on the farmers, it is suggested by muslim scholars to break 5 times a day to rest, and pray for better harvest. In return, the productivity is boasted and the peasants are willing to work comfortably. This practice still survived because ppl tend to think this is a taboo but they “can’t change” as it is a taboo pass on from ancient times.
#16 by ADAM YONG IBNI ABDULLAH on Thursday, 3 April 2008 - 10:52 am
lakilompat.
do you have problems for muslims to pray 5 times a day.?
do you have problems for taoists to pray on the lunar calendar on the first and fifteen of every month ?
do you have problems that christians pray ONLY ON SUNDAY?
do you have problems that Sikhism is also about swords ?
do you have problems that some buddhist are vegetarians?
do you have problems that some chinese are burning expensive cars and sexy lingerie for use in the afterworld of their loved ones?
Religion is about FAITH. Religion is about I BELIEF.
so lakilompat, if you are a monkey, please behave like a monkey and eat bananas. STOP MAKING REMARKS about religion.
adminstrator or moderator. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
#17 by lakilompat on Thursday, 3 April 2008 - 4:22 pm
To ADAM YONG, when some1 come up with something, they will take it as criticism. Did you actually read it and digest it wisely to see, the written guide can solve the ancient problems it might not be practical in today world. The burning of ancestral effigy has been evolving this indicate change as well, previously there is no such thing as refrigerator, or LV bags, or handphone or petrol station (petrol price increases). It is just a moral story to tell the new generation that our ancestor existed. Some ppl just pray at home so that the grandchildren remember their roots. It is just a reminder.
do you have problems for muslims to pray 5 times a day.?
It is not for me to decide, just have to compare ancient times and now, what do u think?
do you have problems for taoists to pray on the lunar calendar on the first and fifteen of every month ?
Not at all, it is just a date reminded by ancestor and acknowlege by taoism, not sure anything abt it will affect life.
do you have problems that christians pray ONLY ON SUNDAY?
Not at all, they can pray anyday at home or church but Sunday is a church mass, a date with god (Christian), for everyone young and old to enjoy the gathering.
do you have problems that Sikhism is also about swords ?
Nope, i’m not a sikhs.
do you have problems that some buddhist are vegetarians?
Unless u r a monk or nun, else u r not obliged to be vegetarians.
do you have problems that some chinese are burning expensive cars and sexy lingerie for use in the afterworld of their loved ones?
Nope becos they miss them, their ancestor, i appreciate the change it’s fun, i believe this is the least we can do to remind our childrens, that such a great and lovely person did existed in this world.
Religion is about FAITH. Religion is about I BELIEF.
Yes, but plz do not blend religion to law, law is for everyone it should not be religion biased law.
so lakilompat, if you are a monkey, please behave like a monkey and eat bananas. STOP MAKING REMARKS about religion.
Not sure abt that, but what’s the point of having a discussion when you can’t accept the criticism, and point of view from different angles? is this democracy we want?
adminstrator or moderator. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
#18 by mosa on Friday, 4 April 2008 - 12:46 pm
As you were saying that “The burning of ancestral effigy has been evolving this indicate change as well, previously there is no such thing as refrigerator, or LV bags, or handphone or petrol station (petrol price increases). It is just a moral story to tell the new generation that our ancestor existed. Some ppl just pray at home so that the grandchildren remember their roots. It is just a reminder”
First while you could find some logic to that action it is pity that you couldn’t see the logic of 5 times daily praying time for muslim, Just as such regular washing keeps you physically clean, regular prayer keeps you spiritually clean.
Second 5 times daily praying has got nothing to do with less productivity as what you were saying in fact it is diametrically opposed of what you thinking. If you hear the meaning of Azan (the call for muslim to perform prayer) one of its line is “”Hayya ‘alal-falah” which mean “Come towards the success”, someone that saying or relating Islam with laziness absolutely got the wrong concept of Praying in Islam in fact the 5 daily prayers don’t take much time in the day, maybe 45 minutes in total. But if you think about how much time you are wasting in your day, you will find that prayers help you to use the rest of your time much better.
Far from being a ritualistic and mindless activity, prayer constantly reminds us of the purpose of life itself, refreshes our faith, and keeps our belief in Allah alive and ever-present. We go back to our wordly affairs conscious of our duties and strengthened against sin. Prayers said in congregation bond Muslims together in love and brotherhood. Prayer also symbolizes the equality of believers; there is no hierarchy, and all stand side-by-side in rows and bow only to Allah.
Democracy shouldn’t be use to make some remarks on what we didn’t fully understand otherwise it will only show how unintelligent we are.
And by the way Islam come from the word Salam which mean peace and stop making remarks that you don’t fully understand perhaps you should ask first.
#19 by lakilompat on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 - 10:44 am
“Democracy shouldn’t be use to make some remarks on what we didn’t fully understand otherwise it will only show how unintelligent we are.”
Should it be used to invade & hang some leaders for their misdeeds?