Whether TCK is fit for the exco post as compared to those selected will be known quite soon. But, obviously, we don’t want a Ean Yong Hian Wah & Roonie Liu who are just not up to the mark. Or more bluntly, i would have said, Ean Yong is just a joke. Manoharan and Lau Weng San are more capable than them.

LKS, as much as i admire your courage to fight for justice and equality for malaysian, i too hope u have more confidence in tackling people management skill which you seems lacking. Don’t invite another “KOKS” campaign.

For other DAP elected representative, don’t ever become YES man just those in MCA or MIC, or else u should not be in politics and the rakyat will kick u off in next election. Remember not of u being elected base on REAL ABILITY rather than the tsunami effect.

I dedicate this song, “You will be a woman soon” because I believe you are sweet 16 going on 17. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrIvqdQdJxo&feature=related

Who is engaging who now? Big fat ego, as you are full of ideas. What else most of you do other than condemning everyday?

If one can’t see I am just retaliating to a sob, then that person or persons stand condemned.

Why would you bother to engage a person who is simply bereft of ideas, and can only condemn others ?” Godfather

I ask that too sometimes.

Zaid is a product of the NEP brought in by the backdoor, into his Cabinet. What does that tell us?? It is ‘change’ we cannot believe.

Why would you bother to engage a person who is simply bereft of ideas, and can only condemn others ?

In today’s papers, it is now clear that Zaid Ibrahim is simply a BN stooge with the ability to say the right things to pacify public anger, and who will distort his original comments to pacify his political masters. Zaid is now tasked with producing a paper on judicial reform - the “first” paper, according to the press. This “first” paper would come AFTER the findings of the IC on the Lingam videoclip. Then he goes on to say that it is too early to set a time-frame for judicial reform.

Zaid also went on to say that the government was “considering” his views on the apology to those victimised in the 1988 judicial crisis. He then called Karpal “naughty” for suggesting that Mahathir should make the apology.

Wasn’t Badawi (and half the present cabinet) part of the former administration ? Who determines who were the actual victims ? The victims go beyond Salleh Abas and the other judges - it is the public who were the victims given that we have been living post 1988 with a tainted judiciary.

Further, if there were “victims”, there had to be “crimes” and who identifies the “criminals”? Even if the chief criminal were the former PM, he has to be brought to book, and not absolved on the ground that “that administration is gone”.

Cakap tak serupa bikin - the usual motto of BN representatives.