Alot of positive ceramah’s review by DAP and its Barisan Rakyat’s partners, I can see. However, have you all listen to an MCA’s ceramah before, in this election?

Let me introduce itself, from last Monday until today, I have attended ceramah everyday except last Friday (work), Monday’s Tony Pua in SS2, Tuesday’s Teresa Kok in Sri Petaling, Wednesday’s Teo Nie Ching in Seri Kembangan, Thursday’s Fong Kui Lun in Brickfield, Saturday’s Hannah Yeoh in USJ 12, Sunday’s Lim Lip Eng in TTDI, yesterday’s Teo Nie Ching again just to catch up Fong Po Kuan. Most of them, I listen all of the speakers before I left even with the rain. And all are greats, or else I won’t be there day in, day out.

Today, I thought want to go to Puchong’s for Gobind Singh to catch up Karpal Singh, however, I changed my mind and went back to home for a rest. However, someone told me that MCA Carol Chew is doing a ceramah near my place, Sri Petaling.

Don’t get me wrong, I already decided who to vote for, even before nomination day, but I am curious to see how pathetic they are, so I decided to go and have a look, just a walking distance from my home.

When I reached there, Carol already finished her speach, and left to the last speaker, who claims to be former worker of Teresa Kok, candidates for Seputeh Parliamentary Seats. And I don’t believe my ears. And alot of people does not believe their ears too. During my 10 minutes stay there, less than 40 people are there, that pathetic, and most are shaking their heads, including myself. If there is eggs on my hand, I will throw it up, thrust me.

FYI, Seputeh area is a safe seat for Seputeh. DAP has hold his area for a very long time. And 2004, Teresa won it big here. We heard Carol’s hitting below the belt by launching the ‘sexist’ cartoon against Teresa. What else she can do?

Below are the simplified contents from the 10 minute speach.
1. 70% of the speach criticising Teresa, saying various scenario, where Teresa misuse the DAP funds. A few scenarios are given, but no prove is given at all. For example, in one of the scenario, he mentioned the workers of Teresa for one of the funds raising activies, use some of the money to buy supper. All allegations without prove. They are extremely desperate. Nobody claps hand this time, compare to DAP ceramah, because we know this is not true.

2. Boasting that MCA under the leadership of Ong Ka ting managed to get a primary school for Seri Petaling resident. Enough of being heard of this issue, don’t believe they dare to use this point as the reason to vote MCA. Only after 50 years, Seri Petaling get one Chinese School, and it is election goodies.

3. This point is the last point that I heard, that make me angry, that if eggs is on my hand, I will just throw towards the speaker. The speaker told us that he agreed that corruption is a fact. He agreed that UMNO is corrupted, but he said DAP is corrupted too base on point 1 mentioned above. He said, what important now is be practical, don’t care about the corruption, a scenario that can’t be fixed, what important is to ensure MCA get more people in parliament, where in appropriate time, the MCA have more people to check UMNO if they go overboard in corruption (little bit never mind). He mentioned that what important now is CHINESE should think of themselves, change are not going to happen, just think of themselves get the goodies offered from MCA for Seputeh area. The country is too big for all of us to concentrate, think of ourself, think of what Seputeh will benefit from MCA as MCA have more money.

And true enough, out of the 40 people that present there, less than 10 claps their hand, when the speaker end the speach. in MCA speach, you will see majority don’t agree on what the speaker said, something that will not happen in DAP ceramah. I know MCA is desperate, but I don’t know they are pathetic at this stage, hitting below the belt and deliver such low quality and unpatriotic speach. Just thought want to share it out, for those that busy attending DAP ceramah, and wonder what BN’s ceramah can offer.

I am extremely angry, the motive of the speaker, to get vote, try to make allegation without prove and give unethical advice like ‘we can tolerate corruption, more important, think about yourself first, take care of yourself first, vote for the one that have more money’.

If speaker/leader can be that low, what hope our country is? Lets vote them out!!