coming this 8 march, lets vote for a change. no more BN.

Koh Tsu Koon buckling under pressure by Umno Youth leader, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein to take disciplinary action against the Gerakan Youth vice chief S. Paranjothy who dared to speak out.
But come to brushing off what Opposition member had said, Koh Tsu Koon appeared to be very brave.[Koh Tsu Koon said Jeff Ooi irresposible and ignorant]
Fellow Malaysians, see for yourselves. Perhaps Koh Tsu Koon should spend more time to study what his member S. Paranjothy spoke out had any truth in them. But Koh Tsu Koon chose to bow to his UMNO boss quickly and willingly.
Please call upon your friends and relatives. Do not Vote for Koh Tsu Koon at Batu Kawan seat. Vote for Jeff Ooi at Jelutong seat. In short, please vote for the Opposition.
We need more oppositions in the Parliment to do check and balance for good governance.

Big words like this has no meaning to my illiterate parents, including my brothers and sisters who, for no wrong of them were simply failed out of their academia years during the years of 70-75.
In these years, the english language as the core medium of instruction of national type schools were just change in short notice, and impacted a drastic step backwards for the nation’s human resource, and literally denied that generation’s future in their academia years.
The hardest hit were those who had to take their form 3 then.
Is planned or what? I think so…considering what had happened to the gomen schools scenario since then.
Mission schools no more, POL no more, uniform changed, no shorts for boys, girls uniform changed, colour scheme of schools changed, food in canteen changed, canteen operators changed,
gardener changed, Jaga Singh no more, text books changed, class monitor changed, prefects changed, teachers changed, headmaster change, school rules changed, school assembly topics changed, contents in history books changed, teaching method periodically changed. i think u can name more….

well, maybe my brother and sister were stupid so they failed, but when also most of their classmates and schoolmates of the same year did not get through too. that ’s something wrong.
who was the initiator of that policy?..the education minister then…?

Are u from this period?…you probably be in 45-46 years old and if you also failed your form 3. it’s okay it doesnt meant anything now,
just make sure it does not happen to your children or grand children and their friends.
I have been hoping that it can be stopped and changed for many years now. This GE2008 appears to give the best hope yet, and the air of change is strong, in fact never stronger, it is going to be a new begining a begining for forward changes.

I will vote that previous club out from the our parlimen.

Just change

TAK NAK TO PETROL INFLATION
TAK NAK TO UNBEARABLE EVERYTHING INFLATION
TAK NAK TO HIGH CRIME
TAK NAK TO LINGAM SCANDAL
TAK NAK TO CHUA SOI LEK SCANDAL
TAK NAK TO CORRUPTION
TAK NAK TO NEPOTISM
TAK NAK TO ………….

http://www.geocities.com/matterofchoice2008/My_page.html

We need the check and balance for good governance.
Please do your part. Please call upon all friends and relatives to vote for the Opposition.
We need to send the right candidates to parliment to voice up for us.
Penang and Jelutong voters, we need more supports to reject BN parasites going into the Parliment.

“….www.comedycourt.com.my /latestshit.html”

See, I’m not the only ‘lysdexic’ one!!

Thanks, Jeffrey QC. That was funny - the correct, correct, correct one. But all said, I think the actors (the ‘voice overs’) were being too kind to the characters involved - perhaps in trying to be ‘politically’ or rather ‘racially correct’.

This YouTube has been circulating on the Net. Great satire. Enjoy.:)
http://www.comedycourt.com.my /latesthits.html

BN Manifesto? Toilet paper is more like it.

As a drinker all my life I resent the fact that I’m being compared to VK Lingam who couldn’t hold his drink past two glasses of cheap red wine.

I came across this Nga Kor Ming’s fiery speech on youtube posted by DAP KL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UgD2y1Tt2Q

Here’s the link to all other videos of Nga Kor Ming.

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=dapkl&p=r

To purchase the above DVDs please contact DAP HQ at 03-79578127

Thanks.

Thanks for the face saving statement.

But in blogs, even a serious political one like this one, lies, deception or nonsense (“black can be white and white can be black as you put it”), of any posting or poster, if couched in appropriate language, ought not to be a skin on anyone’s back – we could even welcome their ventilation here.

This is because lies, deception or nonsense especially those couched and presented in seemingly the most cogent and persuasive language will challenge and help us to more critically test our cherished assumptions and beliefs against them and, in the process of responding to or rebutting such ‘refined’ lies, deception or nonsense, to have the opportunity of not only exposing their errors, for what they are, but also, for ourselves, to have, at the same time, a more vivid and livelier impression of our truths thereafter. That is the essence of freedom of speech.

Because to Shamsul, black can be white and white can be black, it can be paint according to UMNO wishes, as long as they remains in power.

Which is true Jeffrey, which makes one wonder if there’s still any value left in this country. I am not sure if people hate Abdullah because he is a weak Prime Minister or it is Mahathir who makes people hate Abdullah because he knew what’s coming, I can only say Mahathir play his game better than anyone else, that is when the court become a circus, a “drunk lawyer” become a clown. I think people are comfortable because the enjoy the show, besides, what can they do about it?

It couldn’t be Lingam that Shamsul referred as “drunk lawyer” whose rambling while “mabuk” has overestimated his influence and slandered his head of state that is tantamount to treason, come on, an Indian “mabuk lawyer” did that? the whole episode of “Lingam gate” is just like a clown in the circus.

Secondly, my earlier comment was not about Lingam but Tunku Abdul Rahman and Mahathir and the history of UMNO. And the only person came close to slander his head of state that was tantamount to treason could well be Bapa Malaysia himself, if not only himself as history has recorded, he loved to drink.

Since Shamsul always come here to utter his nonsense and respond to other commentators with his own make beliefs and capable of outrages imaginations, which makes me laugh (later puked of course), where on the subject of UMNO, Mahathir and Bapa Malaysia Lingam arises? Shamsul gave me the impression that he would lie all the way even as to slander and call Bapa Malaysia a “drunk lawyer” to achieve his aims here, whatever that may be.

Furthermore, what is wrong with the way I responded to him as he is uttering nonsense anyway.

While they can do neither with style, they certainly can spend their ill gotten gains with style!

First they can’t steal with style, now they can’t even lie with style.

The excessive spending on ” development ” in every budget, has contributed to inflation and the widening and unacceptable gap between rich and poor.

He didn’t actually have what it takes to be a lawyer and had to have help from friends like the late Justice Eusoffee to pass his bar exam - which he finally succeeded and went on to be called to the Bar of England and Wales at the ripe old age of 46.

He could hold his drink better than any drinker I knew, and I knew a lot of good drinkers! He loved to drink. So please do not refer to him as that “drunk lawyer”. He certainly didn’t deserve to be referred to as that “drunk lawyer” or a “poker player” or a betting man when it came to race horses.

Tunku embodied that spirit of “Live and let live” among Malaysians which is now lost between the pages of history, and something which came to him naturally but is today a trait which has to be acquired, if at all, by our leaders.

In 1969 Abdul Rahman helped to set up the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), of which he was the first Secretary-General. Subsequently, he initiated the setting up of the Islamic Development Bank as a specialised institution within the OIC. He was also President of the Regional Islamic Da’wah Council of South East Asia and the Pacific (RISEAP) from 1982 to 1988.

Abdul Rahman upheld the independence social contract of a secular Malaysia with Islam as its official religion. On the occasion of his 80th birthday, Abdul Rahman stated in the The Star newspaper of 9 February 1983 that the “country has a multi-racial population with various beliefs. Malaysia must continue as a secular State with Islam as the official religion.” In the same issue of The Star, Abdul Rahman was supported by the third Malaysian Prime Minister, Hussein Onn, who stated that the “nation can still be functional as a secular state with Islam as the official religion.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunku_Abdul_Rahman

Today, we have Malay muslim name Shamsul Anuar calling Bapa Malaysia a “drunk Lawyer”. No wonder Jeffrey used the description of bochors, bodek, corrupt and parochial characters who got nothing to speak for their credentials except the well worn hackneyed ways of making or taking racist and religious extremist positions to describe UMNO members. Perfectly fit!

The Barisan Rakyat or opposition parties should print a list of all the wrong doings of the Bodowi government to remind the people of the broken promises of BN.

Pisang emas bawa belayar,

Diletak budak di atas peti;

Hutang emas dapat dibayar,

Hutang budi dibawa mati.

After all Bapa Malaysia is just a “drunk lawyer” to you, I am sure we are not mutual on this one!

Looks like Kj’s army has begun their work. Terrorising the commoners and whacking the daylights out of them.

And polcie wont do anything becos it is BN related!

What the shi

http://www.thestar.com.my/election/story.asp?file=/2008/2/26/election2008/20446932&sec=Election2008&focus=1

Well, at least the feeling is mutual. Too bad you are not able to accept that your view with regards to UMNO is well not that “accepted by your Malay friends”.

They say the truth hurts. Malays despite being not vocal do understand that voting for DAP is equivalent to suicide. And I have no need to con my Malay friends. DAP’s reaction to Hindraf accusation is manifastation of its anti-Malay sentiment itself.

Today at 18: 25.30 (4 hours ago)
Those born in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983 etc sure qualify as adult, but those born in ,1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 etc surely not qualify, or there cannot be so many 110 years to 120 years old ppl etc.

Anyway, sad to note that after 51 years, we are still thinking in terms of Bumi, Non Bumi, Malay, Chinese, Indian etc, Perhaps blame this on our forefathers in 1957, if they started Malaya (as Oon Jaffar idea) with only ONE TYPE of citizen, and practice it accordingly, Today Malaysia surely will the Number One economic power in ASEAN. see how much time we hv wasted in arguing “penalise yr own race” lah, “Bumi Quota”, “Bumi Discount” etc

If S’pore can prosper with only ONE TYPE of citizenship, n no need to worry abt racial riot, why Msia cannot do the same!
Ordinary Malay Msian who think S’pore ill treat their Malay, go to S’pore n talk to the Malay there, find out for yourself, rather listen to what UMNO tell you.

Today at 18: 25.30 (4 hours ago)
Those born in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983 etc sure qualify as adult, but those born in ,1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 etc surely not qualify, or there cannot be so many 110 years to 120 years old ppl etc.

Anyway, sad to note that after 51 years, we are still thinking of Bumi, Non Bumi, Malay, Chinese, Indian etc, Perhaps blame this on our forefathers in 1957, if they start Malaya (as Oon Jaffar idea) with only ONE TYPE of citizen, and practice it accordingly, Today Malaysia surely will the Number One economic power in ASEAN. see how much time we hv wasted in arguing “penalise yr own race” lah, “Bumi Quota”, “Bumi Discount” etc

If S’pore can prosper with only ONE TYPE of citizenship, n no need to worry abt racial riot, why Msia cannot do the same!
Ordinary Malay Msian who think S’pore ill treat their Malay, go to S’pore n talk to the Malay there, find out for yourself, rather listen to what UMNO tell you.

“How can majority of Malaysians still vote for UMNO….”. Now, this is an interesting question. How can UMNO still won the election ( together with its allies) despite the unbelievable attacks in these days of internet.

What is it that make UMNO appeals the most to the Malays as compared to PAS, PKR or DAP?The answer actually quite simple. UMNO since Independent chooses to include other races into its government. During Independent in 1957, approximately almost 70% of the seat in Parliament was held by UMNO.

It simply can rule on its own then. Make no mistake on that. But still it chooses to include others. As such,Indians who never have any Indian majority constituents are able to enter Parliament. In states with high percentage of malays like Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Trengganu, Chinese through MCA, Gerakan can still win in Malay majority area.

The coalition includes all races in Malaysia. Now compare this to the alternatives. DAP only appears to a section of Malaysia, namely chinese. Besides, everybody knows the outstanding feature of DAP, that is “father and son” sdn bhd.

PAS is a no no to non Malays not to mention majority of Malay itself. PKR is almost dead.

As for so much appreciation of DAP, perhaps many are willing to forget how their representatives also call others as “lembu, bodoh”. So, look into the mirror before chiding others.

The truth is that vast majority of Malaysians are comfortable with BN. It does deliver. That is the most important factor. Lingam tape issue was perceived differently say in Pendang , Grik or Tampoi than what Lim Kit Siang trying to portray.

To them, the culprit is not Dr Mahathir but a “drunk lawyer” who overestimate his influence and in the process slandered his own head of govt. He is so lucky. In some countries, well he will finds that rambling while “mabuk” is tantamount to treason .