“Fu: seized Bible copies returned to owner” was the headline in yesterday’s Star – on copies of the Bible taken from a woman at the Low Cost Carrier Terminal recently which were promptly returned to her within 24 hours of the matter being highlighted in electronic media like Malaysiakini and foreign agencies and press like the International Herald Tribune and the protest of the Council of Churches Malaysia (CCM).
The question every Malaysian is asking is – why is the government so super-efficient and super-responsive only when the general election is around the corner but such traits are totally forgotten after polling day?
It is just no good enough for Fu to say that the confiscation of 32 Bibles from a woman who had just returned from a visit to Manila was done by a Customs officer and did not involve his Ministry.
This is the account of missionary Juliana Nicholas on her ordeal, as reported by Malaysiakini, which vindicated Malaysiankini columnist Helen Ang’s coining of the term “Little Mullah Napoleons” (LMN):
“On Jan 28, missionary Juliana Nicholas returned from a trip to the Philippines carrying with her two boxes containing 32 bibles meant for her church group.
”Upon arrival at the Low-Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) in Kuala Lumpur, she was told to declare and open the contents of the boxes.
”Having done so – and despite showing them a letter from her parish priest stating the texts were for use by the church – Nicholas was shocked to be hear subsequently that the bibles would be ‘referred’ to the Internal Security Ministry’s Publications and Al-Quran Texts Control Division.
”Protestations that they could check the bibles there and then without the inconvenience of referring them to the ministry fell on deaf ears, said Nicholas.
“’When I objected as these were English bibles, the ministry official I spoke to said, ‘Oh, we do this even with the Qurans that come through this way’. But these are not Qurans, these are English bibles!’ Nicolas said when contacted.
”As to when the bibles can be returned to her ‘would depend on those people at the division’, Nicholas said she was told further.”
Faced with the rise of LMNs in the public service and the growing number of incidents showing an alarming change in the bureaucratic mindset from liberal acceptance and respect for the multi-religious characteristics of Malaysia in the first four decades of Malaysian nationhood to an increasing intolerance of the rights and sensitivities of other religions, the time is well past for Fu to indulge in hair-splitting and buck-passing in the latest insensitivity for a plural Malaysia of diverse races, languages, cultures and religions.
Everybody knows that the LMNs are not within the remit of Fu to contain and discipline.
Malaysians want to know from the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi whether the custom officer who had seized the 31 bibles had been suspended pending a full inquiry for more severe disciplinary action to be taken in view of the gravity of the action.
Even more important, Malaysians are asking whether Abdullah can check the rise of LMNs in the bureaucracy or his Islam Hadhari is creating the opposite effect – providing fertile ground for the LMNs to bully their way in the civil service!

#1 by EARNEST on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 2:09 pm
Laifoong,
If in doubt, ask nicely. Maybe it was inadvertent, but take the trouble not to ridicule others, because you yourself could be wrong.
Another thing, do not mix with or be influenced by wrong company, like Colonel, else you might as well ask him to explain what limkamput said, and he will probably lead you astray because there is something wrong with Colonel’s propensity to mischaracterize and distort exchanges. To him, some biological facts can become sexual perversions; your attempt at altruism can become something wrong with you.
BTW, the word syndrome has 2 distinct meanings. limkamput is using the first definition. See below:
Can you read Chinese? There is also a Chinese definition below:
Syndrome
————
1st definition
• noun: a complex of concurrent things (Example: “Every word has a syndrome of meanings”); things that form pattern: a group of things or events that form a recognizable pattern, especially of something undesirable, like a disorder.
2nd definition
• noun: a pattern of symptoms indicative of some disease. A group of signs and symptoms that collectively define or characterize a disease or disorder; signs are objective findings such as weakness, and symptoms are subjective findings such as a feeling of fear or tingling in a finger.
Definition in Chinese:
Syndrome – “????????? ????????????”
#2 by EARNEST on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 2:11 pm
Laifoong,
If in doubt, ask nicely. Maybe it was inadvertent, but take the trouble not to ridicule others, because you yourself could be wrong.
Another thing, do not mix with or be influenced by wrong company, like Colonel, else you might as well ask him to explain what limkamput said, and he will probably lead you astray because there is something wrong with Colonel’s propensity to mischaracterize and distort exchanges. To him, some biological facts can become sexual perversions; your attempt at altruism can become something wrong with you.
BTW, the word syndrome has 2 distinct meanings. limkamput is using the first definition. See below:
Syndrome
————
1st definition
• noun: a complex of concurrent things (Example: “Every word has a syndrome of meanings”); things that form pattern: a group of things or events that form a recognizable pattern, especially of something undesirable, like a disorder.
2nd definition
• noun: a pattern of symptoms indicative of some disease. A group of signs and symptoms that collectively define or characterize a disease or disorder; signs are objective findings such as weakness, and symptoms are subjective findings such as a feeling of fear or tingling in a finger.
Definition in Chinese: sorry, rejected by WordPress…
#3 by EARNEST on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 2:16 pm
Sorry about the duplications above. Reposted because of repeated WordPress rejection messages, and postings all came out one shot after deletion of Chinese characters.
#4 by EARNEST on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 3:58 pm
Laifoong,
FYI, the word “syndrome†used in name of Hollywood movie…
The China Syndrome – the Movie
The title refers to the concept, mentioned only jokingly in the film, that if an American nuclear plant melts down, it will melt through the Earth until it reaches China . The film was released on March 16, 1979, just twelve days before the real-life events at Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania. The Three Mile Island incident helped propel The China Syndrome into a blockbuster. – Wikipedia
#5 by limkamput on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 6:27 pm
Earnest, you are very kind, I hope laifoong, being a young innocent girl, will take notice and learn from here. If she continues behaving the way she has been doing, I am afraid she may not get a nice husband.
#6 by BoDo Singh on Friday, 8 February 2008 - 10:18 pm
So “For once, let’s get rid of the syndrome of Chinese and Indian representation in government” would according to you, wise EARNEST. be this “inadvertent mistake”.
I may have given myself a self deprecating handle for the same poster to make fun of but I’m not that bodoh to know that this is an example of “hollowed sophistication” that this poster characterized someone he called “a Cambdridge brat”.
#7 by limkamput on Saturday, 9 February 2008 - 1:05 am
Hi Bodo,
That is all you got to comment on my posting? It is not that my posting is a “hollowed sophisticationâ€; it is your hollowed mind that does not understand it. A bodo is a bodo, there is no point to evade or conceal. Cambridge brats, Oxford brats, and Iwantogo Uni brats – what difference.
#8 by catharsis on Saturday, 9 February 2008 - 9:35 pm
Such desperate behaviours and fear for the People of the Scriptures would only reinforce that Islam cannot stand on its pillars of truth ……………
#9 by ERNEST on Sunday, 10 February 2008 - 2:07 am
BoDo Singh,
I meant laifoong inadvertently ridiculing or perceived to be ridiculing limkamput… and this was deemed provocative.
It is not only limkamput’s view that we should “get rid of the syndrome of Chinese and Indian representation in government”. There are many others who have eloquently supported good riddance to bad rubbish.
Somehow, what limkamput said about Cambridge brat’s “hollow sophistication” in retaliation for what Cambridge brat said stuck. Nobody seem to remember what Cambridge brat said which provoked his reply to attack, that his reasoning was simplistic.
We need to have a fair and balanced view and not take something out of context to disparage a person.
Also, please change your handle to something more respectful of yourself. You need to respect yourself first if you want others to respect you. Mohammad Ali, 4 times world boxing champion once said if you are so good like him, to be humble is to be hypocritical.
If you are not going to blow your own trumpet, nobody is going to blow for you. If you call yourself BoDo, how do you expect others to take you seriously?
#10 by kaybeegee on Sunday, 10 February 2008 - 11:46 am
[deleted]
Can the legal department of the DAP consider this situation with regards to body snatching from houses of NON MUSLIMS. The Islamic religious department has no jurisdiction over non Muslims. Should they not get an Order from a Civil court before they enter non Muslim property? It is trespass, a lawyer told me. The Polis Dia Raja Malaysia instead of going after criminals should also be sued for trespass because they enforce federal laws not state enactments.
A dead body does not belong to the islamic religious department . Start educating us of our rights. Inform non Muslims that the islamic religious department can be sued for trespass. The Police as well
#11 by limkamput on Sunday, 10 February 2008 - 1:22 pm
Earnest, you are the master, seriously.
#12 by BoDo Singh on Monday, 11 February 2008 - 9:58 pm
You’re right, Earnie. I should change my handle to “You Dirty Old Man”