When I say ‘good’ I mean someone who not only have technical competence and experience in ghis professed calling on which public and client rely but the right attitude of pride in his work, translated, it means to take care of your best interest and not being overly concerned with money being first consideration.

However I agree that the last 10 to 20 years, increasingly there are more not so good professionals remaining but many commercially driven ones being spawned - whilst the ones who had traditional pride in professional work and ethics have died or retired. I won’t say each and every of the younger ones in law as well as other professions are no good or have no potential.

However, because so many professionals are pouring into the market competition becomes very keen and many professionals put their own commercial well being above all considerations. (This should not be in professions. A profession is a knowledge calling; it has tradition and ethics; it is given social respect precisely because of these and not because it makes money which is cornerstone of business, as distinct from a profession).

No doubt the business and commercial opportunities are more nowadays but measured by Lorenz Curve they are not evenly and fairly distributed for all to survive meaningfully according to their perceived station in life. The well connected, especialy politically connected and large firms get the bulk of the plums. Many of the rest put their own survival higher than your interest as client. Very sad state of affairs, I would say.

Instead of asking their deep pocket client to settle a dispute with me out of court based on the legal and technical reasons, Malaysian lawyer was writing 2-feet tall and a full of rubbish affidavit.

At the end of the day, they are like a dog chasing its tail, hit the dead wall.

My lawyer estimated that GLC has to pay at least a half millon RM fees to their lawyer for producing a several thousand pages of affidavit.

Haven’t I just taught you don’t use word like retard? But then if someone is mentally challenged, then i guess he can’t discern the difference btw the two. So Dracula, do your pick, retard or mentally challenged. Your choice.

The idea to work with communists was rejected by bosses of secret societies.

Indian gangsters are not just causing public safety problem, it may evolving into national security threat if this social ill unchecked.

Correction: principle, not principal.

Met up a friend in a restaurant at Bandar Perdana Chears this morning, he told me his neighbour also got robber by a gang of Indian robbers days ago.

I moved to KL 4 years ago and witnessed three crimes, all involved Indians.