Former Prime Minister, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has clearly recovered his “elephant memory” from his comments on the death of former Indonesian President Suharto.
Mahathir told Bernama that accounts the former Indonesian leader killed some 500,000 people after taking power in 1965 were “absolute nonsense”.
He said: “I know this for a fact. I knew what happened. Indonesia was in a state of anarchy then and he has no authority. At the time of the killings, he was not even the president. He did not order the killing.”
Mahathir, who ruled for two decades before stepping down in 2003, said he regarded Suharto as a friend of Malaysia and a personal friend.
“We looked up to him as a great leader and as an international statesman. For me, it’s quite personal. I know him and I have worked with him for a very long time.
“Even though Indonesia was not an ideal democracy during Suharto’s time, the fact remained that he brought stability to Indonesia.”
Mahathir added: “Of course, there is a price to be paid,” acknowledging that some people had suffered under Suharto’s administration.
Without getting into a debate on Mahathir’s assessment of Suharto’s leadership of Indonesia, it is good to see Mahathir’s recovery from his recent lapse of memory. He gave his comments on Suharto with confidence and authority, in total command of his memory.
This was very unlike his appearance before the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on Lingam Tape eleven days ago on January 17, when he had to repeatedly plead loss of memory in his 90-minute testimony.
Asked why he rejected the recommendation of the then Chief Justice, Tun Dzaiddin Abdullah to appoint Dr. Andrew Chew Peng Hui and Zainuddin Ismail as judges, Mahathir replied: “I don’t remember my reasons.”
Asked whether he could recall that before Ahmad Fairuz was recommended as chief judge of Malaya, Dzaiddin had nominated Malek Ahmad, Mahathir said: “I can’t remember precisely.”
There was this Q & A between Mahathir and Dzaiddin’s counsel, Wong Chong Wah:
Wong: Do you remember whether, when Dzaiddin recommended Malek Ahmad, you rejected his suggestion?
Dr Mahathir: I can’t remember him recommending to me.
Wong: A letter dated Aug 19, 2002, from Dzaiddin to you, suggests that he had made an earlier recommendation for Malek Ahmad to be chief judge of Malaya. Did you agree to Dzaiddin’s recommendation at that stage?
Dr Mahathir: I don’t remember whether I agreed or not. I’ve read this
letter but I don’t recall any decision I made on Malek Ahmad.
Now that Mahathir has recovered his “elephant memory” he should be recalled to the RCI on Lingam Tape to throw light on the many dubious and devious decisions he made affecting the judiciary particularly during the last 15 years of his 22-year premiership where he single-handedly destroyed national and international confidence in the independence, integrity and quality of the judiciary.

#1 by Tickler on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 1:52 pm
The reason for the dislike is because Eusoff had lied about Mohamed Dzaiddin’s Tan Sri award conferment.
http://malaysiakini.com/
So Eusoff `lies`.
#2 by Tickler on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 1:56 pm
Why did Eusoff Chin tell the RCI that he is a pensioner?
At the start of his testimony, Eusoff, 73, told the court interpreter that he was a “pensioner.â€
(http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/1/19/nation
But see BINTULU PORT HOLDINGS BERHAD:
CHAIRMAN
Y. A. Bhg. Tun Dato’ Seri Hj Mohd Eusoff bin Chin
(http://www.bpsb.com.my)
Bintulu Ports is a company listed on the KLSE.One doubts if its chairman could be considered a “pensioner”.
#3 by disapointed86 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 1:56 pm
wahahaha…no point…everybody knows that he is just competing with Eusoff Chin to say ” i cant really remember”..hahaha… he should be awarded Oscar award for his brilliant performance in acting…well done Dr. mahathir..haha…
#4 by Tickler on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 1:57 pm
From The Business Times, Malaysia
Eusoff is chairman of Alcatel’s Malaysian unit
PARIS-based Alcatel has named Tun Mohd Eusoff Chin as the chairman of its Malaysian subsidiary, Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd. Alcatel managing director in Malaysia, Datuk Yusof Ampuan Kecil, said the combination of Eusoff’s leadership ability and extensive government service will be an asset to the company.
Eusoff was the Chief Justice of Malaysia for six years until his retirement in 2000.
Eusoff, in a statement released in Kuala Lumpur, said since retiring from government service, “I have been looking for an opportunity to further contribute to our country’s development.
“In accepting this offer from Alcatel, I have found that opportunity, given the vital role that technology will play in Malaysia’s future,” he added.
(17 January 2006 Business Times)
#5 by aiD_kamikuP on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:02 pm
How you wish this guy is in a similar spot to a husband whose wife would complain that ‘you are only interested in one thing’ and the husband cannot remember what it is.
#6 by aiD_kamikuP on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:09 pm
“This was very unlike his appearance before the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on Lingam Tape eleven days ago on January 17, when he had to repeatedly plead loss of memory in his 90-minute testimony.” – YB Lim
Perhaps they should have checked if his pants was soiled at the end of the 90-minute testimony. If it was, then they should have pity on him.
#7 by g2geetoo on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:18 pm
Don’t waste time on the stubborn fool called mahathir. He has screwed Malaysia big time last 22 years. He has proven to the whole country that he’s biggest LIAR during the RCI.
He defended a dictator like himself and he’s trying to protect his own legacy here. I bet his legacy will soon be gone before his passing.
He failed us during the RCI, just like has failed us in his 22 years of dictatorship. He was drving a Porsche without any passengers, just himself!
#8 by TruthEnquirer on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:47 pm
Tun Dr Mahathir will say that it is also his prerogative to remember important things of interest to him (like whether allegations about Suharto killing some 500,000 people after taking power in 1965 were true) and forget unimportant things like why he chose Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh as chief justice over Tan Sri Abdul Malek Ahmad or why the nomination of two lawyers – Dr Andrew Chew and Zainuddin Ismail – nominated for High Court judge positions were rejected by him.
But then everything about Mahathir appears “selective†right from his selective memory to his much touted policy achievement of selective capital controls to ward of the hedge fund currency attackers.
His statement that “Even though Indonesia was not an ideal democracy during Suharto’s time, the fact remained that he brought stability to Indonesia – of course, there is a price to be paid†can be almost be substituted as what might well amount to his own view and defence of his own political legacy : that is, “Even though Malaysia was not an ideal democracy during Mahathir’s time, the fact remained that he brought stability to Malaysia – of course, there is a price to be paidâ€.
But what price is that for us Malaysians to pay – increased racial polarization, Islamisation leading to body snatching and moral policing after article 121(1)A constitutional amendment and declaration of this an Islamic state; a system of administration of justice where good judges of integrity and conscience were replaced by those whose main qualification was to be able to “bodek†and to seek favours based on political influence ?
By the ways are going, it looks as if both TDM and his idol the late Suharto whom he admires, would be able to avoid a full accounting to the public for what they have done, by way of legacy to the nation, during their respective reigns.
#9 by sotong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:47 pm
500,000 people were killed & it’s nonesense? Ask the Indonesians, they would tell you more than 3 millions were killed, including people loyal to Sukarno and many Communists/farmers fighting for the right to own a small piece of land.
This guy could not stop lying…..after lying for decades, one would have done the right thing by speaking the truth for the country to heal and move forward.
#10 by Jong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:51 pm
Still no sign of Mahathir willing to repent, what a shame. One former dictator’s gone and the other on queue!
#11 by greatstuff on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 2:58 pm
Suharto, his family, and his cronies were a bunch of ruthless crooks and everyone knows it!
Its hard to see why the great Tun and his pals are so admiring of such a character in this day and age.
#12 by shiver on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 3:13 pm
mahathir mudah lupa.
he is a much quieter guy now since the linggam-gate scandal broke eh? doesnt say much now days.
i hope all those mahathir supporters will mark “X” to DAP/PKR/PAS
please do not vote independents cause independents usually run back to BN if they win. for example, that sandakan MP chap.
#13 by Libra2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 3:25 pm
Kit,
But when he takes the witness stand he might go into a relapse and forget the answers.
This old goat is actually a fox.
#14 by sotong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 3:28 pm
If Suharto is a great and successful leader, you will not find millions of legal and illegal Indonesians in the world, in particular our country.
#15 by Tickler on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 3:33 pm
The Haidar Commission in ruling not to admit evidence on fixing of court decisions has severely affected public confidence that the present administration is serious in restoring the rule of law in Malaysia.
[ ]
The purpose and objective of the Enquiry is to assure both the Malaysian public and foreigners that judges in Malaysia dispense justice without fear or favour. Unfortunately, instead of adopting a robust approach to surgically remove the cancer of corruption in the judiciary in all its forms, the Commissioners adopt at a restricted interpretation of its term of reference and thereby exclude investigation into the most malignant form of corruption that decisions of the Courts in Malaysia can be fixed.
http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2008/01/29/keengganan-menerima-bukti-menghakis-keyakinan/#respond
#16 by Jong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 3:42 pm
He has to praise the former Indon dictator to set an example so that same will accord him when he’s gone. There’s fear many will piss on his grave when he’s gone!
#17 by gofortruth on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 4:30 pm
What can you uncover from a cover up commission?
They are all in it together to put on some show to fool the public.
Frankly, where is our AGONG?????????
#18 by grace on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 4:36 pm
It is real scary to learn that almost every strata of the judiciary is plagued by corruption. And also those few ‘privilleged’rouge lawyers and ‘despicable’ tycoons and businessmen control them.
If any poor guys like us were to come against those sinners under those judges, no God can help us!
Ha!Ha! This is the sad state of affairs we are in.
Pak Lah, please do not shout the stupid slogans like “I will clean up corruption” – My toes laugh
“Work with me and not for me” – My nose is tickle
“I have big ears” – Oh shit, my goose pimples keep popping up.
“I care for the rakyat”, my @@@@-h is crying
#19 by Earshot on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 4:56 pm
“He has to praise the former Indon dictator to set an example so that same will accord him when he’s gone. There’s fear many will piss on his grave when he’s gone!” – Jong
Unless this incredible man makes good his equally incredible testimony, if the R-toothless-C-tiger-I would be open to his recall that is, he will be relentlessly plagued by credibility crisis for the rest of his, what I would wish, long life.
But it is magnanimous of Mahathir to come out and say some nice words on the passing of Suharto. But when it eventually comes to his, many honest though equally ruthless leaders would rather remain silent.
#20 by Tickler on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 5:05 pm
Suharto has now joined Pol Pot and is safely in Satan`s good hands.
#21 by oknyua on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 5:06 pm
“Still no sign of Mahathir willing to repent, what a shame. One former dictator’s gone and the other on queue.” Jong (must be you this time)
Really I am lingam-fatigue already. There is no way TDM is going to sit in front of the judges that he helped installed. The present mess is his handiwork, just why should he help us to sort this out? Just as he is not obliged to give reasons how he chose judges, he is not obligated to answer us too. This is his legacy. (Tun Salleh is stirring in his grave.)
#22 by Jong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 5:22 pm
Hey what it, Tun Salleh is still alive and kicking! :D
#23 by AhPek on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 5:23 pm
Wow, he can even remember events as far back as 1965 ….42 years ago and not be able to remember one that is even less than 10 years ago!
Are you trying to tell us it’s your prerogative to choose what to remember and what not?That is also probably why it takes a chap like you to think of this ‘Malaysia Boleh’ thing.
#24 by Jong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 5:23 pm
oops, sorry should read “watch it… “
#25 by gofortruth on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 6:08 pm
TDM survived 2 open heart surgery within the space of 2 weeks. God has been merciful to him and is giving him a unique chance to come forward to the nation he has ruled for 22 years to clear up whatever cancerous mess that he thinks he has created that plaques the country now.(This is not to say that he has not done anything good for his country).
Sadly he chose his God given life to play ‘forget’!
#26 by boh-liao on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 6:29 pm
Current PM has elephant ears that hear selective voices.
Ex PM has elephant memory that remembers selective events.
Interesting common traits.
God has been merciful to TDM – maybe to give him a chance to listen directly to the voices of Malaysians, to praise or to condemn him. God is merciful!
#27 by burn on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 6:38 pm
because of him, secularism die…
thank you to BN component parties!
#28 by k1980 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:02 pm
Mahatir: “It is up to him to decide. It’s also up to the people to decide. If the people want him to move on, if they think his administration is not benefiting them, they should make a decision.”
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-31648220080129?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true
#29 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:06 pm
Asked why he rejected the recommendation of the then Chief Justice, …., Mahathir replied: “I don’t remember my reasons. Asked whether he could recall …, Mahathir said: “I can’t remember precisely.â€
In the art of advocacy, during cross-examination of the witness, you don’t ask questions of a witness the answers to which you don’t know. Counsel must have known that he would plead loss of memory. Ask him questions answers to which which he can remember, then ask him a question to which he can and should remember the answer but which you know he would say he does not. It goes to his credibility and he would be made to look like a fool, a witness who cannot be believed to speak the truth.
However, this is the stage of information gathering.
#30 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:07 pm
ooops relied instead of believed
#31 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:14 pm
“There is no way TDM is going to sit in front of the judges that he helped installed. The present mess is his handiwork, just why should he help us to sort this out?” oknyua
Listen up, folks! Mahathir is not a witness of truth. How could he be when speaking the truth would incriminate himself?! His only line of defense is “I don’t remember” and to prolong this line of questioning would be to make his examiners look like fools.
#32 by catharsis on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:16 pm
Uncle Lim you need not worry about his selective memory. His appointment with God is due soon……….of course he would love to forget all those transgression
#33 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:20 pm
But this is only a public inquiry and not a trial. His answers and the transcript of this hearing would be admissible in evidence when and if there is a trial. So all is not lost.
#34 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 7:36 pm
Linigam on Lingam III was seen drinking red wine. He only drinks wine a habit he acquired after the numerous dinings he kept at the Inn of Court in London when port is served. He is not a habitual drinker which is obvious from the way he held his wine glass.
So when Lingam says he becomes tipsy after two glasses I believe he’s speaking the truth. He was tipsy because of the way he put down his wine glass with a thump! But wait a minute! When you are tipsy doesn’t the truth come out of you like water does when the floodgates are opened?
#35 by limkamput on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 8:52 pm
I heard that when Mahathir stepped into the inquiry room, all the people in the room, including the commissioners, stood up. And today, in Malaysiakini, he said he fears corruption in the coming general election. What baloney! The great architect of corruption and cronyism is now talking about corruption in this country. How can we let him off so lightly? Can we not see the pattern here? Almost all former strongmen in the region with chequered past are protected, live comfortably with the best of medical care till they die naturally. The only institution Asia governments have inculcated since the end of colonialism is the institution of protection former corrupted leaders. The rest of the institutions of governance they systematically destroyed.
Sdr Lim, the general election is getting really near. I hope you can solicit from the bloggers the issues which the oppositions, particularly the DAP, should focus on. We have so many issues confronting us and I think it is pointless to shoot everywhere. We ought to focus on a few that matter to most people. Seriously, what about no toll within all metropolitan areas, be it KL, JB, and Penang? It is the duty of the government to provide roads as cities expand. Car owners have paid enough taxes, both car related and personal taxes. If the government chooses to spend it on everything else except building roads, that is their problem. Collecting toll within metropolitan areas not only imposes burden on the people but also causes unnecessary traffic diversion and traffic jams. NO TOLL Within Metropolitan areas.
#36 by izrafeil on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:09 pm
what election?! I have written many emails to MPAJ to tengok2 my belakang rumah – the playground has been run down, the park lights no lampu, they never repair one … so i dont believe election is around the corner yet!!!!
#37 by mata_kucing on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:12 pm
Dictators of the same feather flock togather.
#38 by mata_kucing on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:13 pm
Dictators of the same feather always flock together.
#39 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:32 pm
“I heard that when Mahathir stepped into the inquiry room, all the people in the room, including the commissioners, stood up.” limkamput
Would the judge stand up when Mahathir takes the witness stand? It’d be fun to watch. Would Mahathir stand up when Prime Minister Abdullah walks in? That too would be fun to watch.
When the President of the United States is subpoenaed to give evidence in court, he does so as a witness – not as President. So you won’t see judges standing up when he walks into the court room.
#40 by ktteokt on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:38 pm
This is what the Chinese call “Pain is only felt when the needle is pricked on one’s own flesh”.
#41 by DarkHorse on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 9:41 pm
No pain no pleasure says the monkey!
#42 by dawsheng on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:31 pm
The tip of the tongue (TOT) phenomenon is an instance of knowing something that cannot immediately be recalled. TOT is a near-universal experience with memory recollection involving difficulty retrieving a well-known word or familiar name. When experiencing TOT, people feel that the blocked word is on the verge of being recovered. Despite failure in finding the word, people have the feeling that the blocked word is figuratively “on the tip of the tongue.” Inaccessibility and the sense of imminence are two key features of an operational definition of TOTs (A.S. Brown, 1991).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_of_the_tongue
#43 by dawsheng on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:33 pm
Amnesia (from Greek ???????) (see spelling differences) is a condition in which memory is disturbed. The causes of amnesia are organic or functional. Organic causes include damage to the brain, through trauma or disease, or use of certain (generally sedative) drugs. Functional causes are psychological factors, such as defense mechanisms. Hysterical post-traumatic amnesia is an example of this. Amnesia may also be spontaneous, in the case of transient global amnesia[1]. This global type of amnesia is more common in middle-aged to elderly people, particularly males, and usually lasts less than 24 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesia
#44 by dawsheng on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:34 pm
Amnesia (from Greek ???????) (see spelling differences) is a condition in which memory is disturbed. The causes of amnesia are organic or functional. Organic causes include damage to the brain, through trauma or disease, or use of certain (generally sedative) drugs. Functional causes are psychological factors, such as defense mechanisms. Hysterical post-traumatic amnesia is an example of this. Amnesia may also be spontaneous, in the case of transient global amnesia[1]. This global type of amnesia is more common in middle-aged to elderly people, particularly males, and usually lasts less than 24 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesia
#45 by naked taliban on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:35 pm
izrafeil says , 21;09
……so i don’t believe election is around the corner yet !!.
notice the big BN flag in flats compound in front of Masjid pandan indah and resurfacing of roads in Tmn Muda.
#46 by dawsheng on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:35 pm
Amnesia (from Greek ???????) (see spelling differences) is a condition in which memory is disturbed. The causes of amnesia are organic or functional. Organic causes include damage to the brain, through trauma or disease, or use of certain (generally sedative) drugs. Functional causes are psychological factors, such as defense mechanisms. Hysterical post-traumatic amnesia is an example of this. Amnesia may also be spontaneous, in the case of transient global amnesia[1]. This global type of amnesia is more common in middle-aged to elderly people, particularly males, and usually lasts less than 24 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesia
#47 by dawsheng on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:39 pm
Amnesia (from Greek ???????) (see spelling differences) is a condition in which memory is disturbed. The causes of amnesia are organic or functional. Organic causes include damage to the brain, through trauma or disease, or use of certain (generally sedative) drugs. Functional causes are psychological factors, such as defense mechanisms. Hysterical post-traumatic amnesia is an example of this. Amnesia may also be spontaneous, in the case of transient global amnesia[1]. This global type of amnesia is more common in middle-aged to elderly people, particularly males, and usually lasts less than 24 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesia
#48 by Jong on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 10:57 pm
dawsheng, see a doctor tomorrow, you are showing signs of amnesia already! – posting 4 times same comment repeatedly!
#49 by despin on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 11:06 pm
Mahathir has been quiet until today for the following reasons:
1) He had to keep a low profile because he was not sure how the Lingam Tape was going to pan out. Now that the inquiry is “going wellâ€, he can talk and remember again.
2) His pet company, Proton, has remained in Malaysian hands,
3) His cronies can now milk the double-track railway project,
4) He has a heart problem (if not mistaken, it started a few days after the Altantuya explosion…â€alamak, the guy that I expect to protect me is implicated…arghhâ€.
All is not lost though. There is still the outstanding issue of the crooked bridge project. He will be “critical†of Abdullah’s administration until the crooked bridge is revived. When that is done, he will most likely put his feet up and disappear into the sunset.
#50 by waterfrontcoolie on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 - 11:30 pm
It is sad that it took so many years for Malaysians with ‘poor memory ‘ to find out that they were all taken for an eternal ride by someone who can choose to forget or to remember whenever it suits his fancy. His followers and cronies hero whoreship him and said that without him we would not be where we are. Thay are right! Without his mode of ‘piratization’ this country would not have to carry all the shits he had burdened the nation with. I don’t think you can count them with your fingers, you will need your toes too!