I have today received a complaint from a parent of a prefect in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar (formerly English College) in Johor Bahru expressing the strongest objection to any attempt to make “songkok” part of the compulsory uniform of school prefects and students in the school.
He said his son, who is in Form Five, has been a school prefect in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar since he was in Form Two and had always been an exemplary student, as well has won praise from many teachers for his exemplary conduct and commitment to his duties and studies. He is also a member of the ExCo of the Prefectorial Board.
The parent wrote:
“Recently, in the beginning of this year, there was an instruction from the school, which I believe came from the teacher advisor to the Prefectorial Board, that Prefects have to start wearing the Songkok as part of the official uniform. At first, the instruction was that it would only be required during ‘official functions’ like school assemblies and during interschool events or major events like sports day and speech day. However, this has now been revised to include daily prefectorial duties.
“There are reasons to believe that the practice of getting Prefects to wear the Songkok, is a prelude to getting ALL the students of the school to eventually follow suit.
“My son, after conferring with me, has decided that he will NOT wear the Songkok. He is willing to resign from the Prefectorial Board if forced to wear the Songkok.”
The parent expresses grave regret at the utter lack of sensitivity of the school authorities on this issue, stating in considerable detail his objections – as “the songkok is an emblem of the Malay identity” and “non-Malays should not be forced to don attire which does not reflect their identity”.
I put up the parent’s letter on my blog and in a matter of less than eight hours there had been over 80 responses – demonstrating the strong feelings evoked by another addition to a catalogue of insensitivities recently shown by those in power or in authority in government to the legitimate rights and sensitivities of diverse races, religions and cultures in a plural society – aggravating racial and religious polarization instead of forging greater unity and understanding among the different races, religions and cultures in the country.
What has happened to the former English College, which has produced many prominent Malaysians, including former Deputy Prime Minister and elder ASEAN statesman, Tun Musa Hitam – who has been described as “the best Prime Minister Malaysia never had”?
It is very sad that the 50th Merdeka anniversary had been marked by an unprecedented display of insensitivity to the diverse races, religions and cultures in Malaysia to the extent that the true meaning of the Merdeka “social contract” had been distorted and overturned.
Some of these examples of insensitivity during the 50th Merdeka anniversary are:
• Declaration that Malaysia is an Islamic state;
• The keris-wielding by Umno Youth leader and Education Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein;
• Demolition of Hindu temple on the eve of Deepavali;
• Holding of the Umno General Assembly on Deepavali itself;
• Public excoriation of the Indian news vendors as if they were at fault for Deepavali being an annual press holiday, resulting in no newspapers the next day to cover the Umno Presidential speech of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi;
• Call by extremist UMNO MPs in Parliament for the removal of the “cross” and Christian symbols in mission schools’;
• The ban on the use of “Allah” by Christian and Sikh religions; and
• The revocation of approval for building the 108-ft Mazu statue in Kudat, which will be the tallest Mazu statue in the world and would also be a tourist revenue-earner for Kudat, Sabah and Malaysia.
Recently, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called on moderates to take the centre stage and not to allow extremist elements to occupy it to raise sensitive religious and racial issues detrimental to nation-building in plural Malaysia.
Abdullah should maintain the 50-year status quo where the racial, religious and cultural sensitivities of all communities in plural Malaysia are given proper regard and respect and send out clear directives to the Education Minister to nip in the bud all insensitive and divisive tendencies in all educational institutions like the retrogressive proposal to make the songkok part of official uniform for school prefects and students in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar, Johor Baru.
(Media Conference Statement at DAP PJ Hqrs on Friday, 11th January 2008)

#1 by dawsheng on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 1:40 pm
“What has happened to the former English College, which has produced many prominent Malaysians, including former Deputy Prime Minister and elder ASEAN statesman, Tun Musa Hitam – who has been described as “the best Prime Minister Malaysia never hadâ€?”
If we are talking about the best Prime Minister Malaysia never had, Lim Kit Siang certainly qualified, next is Anwar Ibrahim.
#2 by k1980 on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 1:42 pm
“The big problem that we have is that nobody trusts each other anymore,” he said. “There’s a working relationship, a very strong working relationship at the top level of society, but at every other level of society it just doesn’t work. “That’s the problem, this administration needs to understand that it has created a monster.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7178709.stm
#3 by dawsheng on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 1:44 pm
“Recently, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called on moderates to take the centre stage and not to allow extremist elements to occupy it to raise sensitive religious and racial issues detrimental to nation-building in plural Malaysia.”
The only person who is detrimental to nation-building in plural Malaysia is Abdullah Badawi, the worst Prime Minister Malaysia ever had.
#4 by boh-liao on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 1:56 pm
Not only the English College in Johor Bahru, but also many ex-top schools of the country in many other states, like Penang Free School, Malacca High School, etc., have been systematically ruined by the Umno-led BN government over the last 20 years.
They used to be multiracial and multicultural schools where students interacted and competed without much interference from the political masters. Now, sadly, they are Malay-nised and converted into entities very different from their previous glorious forms.
No wonder most alumni (especially those who graduated before the 1980s) of these schools refuse to have much to do with their alma maters in their current forms. All thanks to our Umno-led BN government.
#5 by max2811 on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 1:57 pm
No matter how many times or how frequent the PM reminds his people, there will sure be bigots try to outdo another in becoming who is more pious.
We face this everyday in schools. They are asking for suraus in Chinese schools even when there are not enough function rooms. They are asking that the pupils wear baju kurung on Fridays and songkoks for certain type of functions. Even MPs are wearing them.
But does wearing a songkok make a person more religious? Why are there still so many robberies and rapes committed by certain people who wears the songkok or skull caps?
These people in power in the schools dare to implement without fearing of hurting the sensitivities of races is because they are protected by people in UMNaziO.
Sometimes I feel strange training a player/athelete who wears a tudung. The inconvenience she has to go through and restrictions to her movements. Are we actually progressing? Or are we heading towards the Talibans?
#6 by max2811 on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:00 pm
Sorry for some typing errors.
trying/athlete
#7 by Taikor on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:20 pm
The old English College was gone. The new English College, now known as Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar, did not produce any recognisable talents.
It has ended up with the same fate as Raja Petra’s former school, the Malay College Kuala Kangsar, ever since the supremacists took over.
#8 by oedipus on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:25 pm
actually EC (english college) was THE premier boy school back in the days, and until recently although still regarded as a premier school, the school is more known for its gangterism and truancy more than anything else. i have heard of fights of all sorts coming from the school. i recall that someone old me SSI (Sek. Sultan Ismail) is the top national school in Jb. heck, back in the days, SSI was no where compared to EC!
exam results are mediocre as with sport achievements. this for me, is just another nail in its coffin.
ex-EC boy.
#9 by gofortruth on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:26 pm
What are they trying to do?
To promote racial unrest & disharmony?
How can this be allowed to happen in the first place, don’t we have an education minister in the country?
What will Pak Lah do to deal with this extreme elements now inflicting the school?
Or is this all part of a BN political game plan to further polarize the ethnic groups to win over the Malay votes?
#10 by sani on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:26 pm
YB
I have many Malaysians friends of all races + faith, both locally + aboard.
Group A1 : The truely spirited group. Those who truly believe in Malaysia. A fatherland for all deserving citizens, who pledge loyalty to the King + country of multi colors. The group that believe that alloying of cultures makes one own culture stronger. A group of outlooking Malaysians who accept all good morality from the rest of the world.
Group Peanuts : The truely narrow minded group. Those who subcribe to politics of racesim, religious pettiness + corruption in all kinds of forms. Those who are not loyal to Malaysia, as to them, the “Malay” in Malaysia stands for the Malay. The “Sia”, “S” for Sino, “I” for Indians + “A” for And others.
I + most of my friends are of Group A1.
The Group Peanuts are mostly gang under the clique named the BN.
I know most of you are Group A1 folks. Encourage others in Group A1 to stand up + be counted this coming GE.
#11 by cheng on soo on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:34 pm
Is it just an ordinary songkok, or one with school emblem, colours etc, maybe the principal hv interest in some songkok supply shop??
Does Mini of Educ. allow a principal to impose a dress code at will for the students?? If so, very dangerous oh? The principal can make money instructing all students to get uniform, songkok, PE shorts n T-shirt, sports wears, shoes, tie, tudung, etc from a particular shop, etc??
If they want all non malay to wear songkok n other malay dress, are they willing to give these non malay, bumi status??
#12 by smeagroo on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:44 pm
we are heading towards dark times. Looking at things, is this what the Bible mentioned abt the 666? Are we facing it now?
#13 by BlueBear on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 2:45 pm
I am very angered by this, and the act of making this compulsory is in my view is culturally insensitive. I hope YB Lim will continue to press this issue.
#14 by Bigjoe on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 3:20 pm
Does anyone see how ridiculous is it for the PM of this country to decide on whether someone should/could wear a songkok or not?
How different are we from a monarchy?
Its ridiculous when parents, teachers and principles cannot decide on a simple thing like this. Its highly DANGEROUS when they would not even talk to each other about it…
#15 by grace on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 3:22 pm
“At first, the instruction was that it would only be required during ‘official functions’ like school assemblies and during interschool events or major events like sports day and speech day.”
Even songkok should not be worn by non-Muslims during assemblies or sports day. The HM must be running out of ideas.
Stand for your right. If I have children there, I WILL NOT ALLOW THEM TO WEAR ON ANY OCCASSION.
All these controversies arise because our poer that be is directionless. Any one with residual power could implement any rules or policies as and when they like. The Reason: They know that they would get away with it. If parents protest they will not give in unril the ministers stepped in. They would coax the culprit to give up the idea. Remeber theydo not direct them to stop implementing the stupid policies but ‘pujuk’ them
Why is it so? Some of the ministers are equally ?????????
#16 by madmix on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 3:35 pm
This a symptom of government officials implementing their own laws based on their believes and inklings: the Seremban school that segregated their boys and girls. The immigration officials that declared no more imported priests, temple sculptors etc. and then no more workers from India. This is getting more and more out of hand and yet nothing is done to discipline such officials suggesting the government is condoning such activities detrimental to non-Malaysa and non-Muslims.
#17 by Tickler on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 3:48 pm
THAICOM, a private satellite company in Thailand, has begun airing the broadcasts of Hizbullah’s Al-Manar TV. The satellite covers Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East, and most of Europe.
The Thai satellite has significantly boosted the resonance of Al-Manar’s propaganda messages around the world, said the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC) in Herzliya, Israel. “This is an outrage,” said ITIC head, Dr. Reuven Erlich. “Other satellites have stopped airing Al-Manar, so Hizbullah has found a way round it.”
The United States’ Department of State decided in December 2004 to add Al-Manar to its Terrorist Exclusion List. Since then, the European satellites Hispasat and Eutelsat have ceased airing the station’s broadcasts.
“It’s a war. Al-Manar is Hizbullah’s main communication tool, through which it spreads anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic, and anti-American incitement. It spreads Hizbullah and Iranian values of radical Islam,” Erlich explained. He added that the fact that Al-Manar can now be seen in south-east Asia, means that Indonesia and Malaysia, two countries with a large Muslim population, are open to its messages of hatred.
#18 by wsblurtn on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 3:49 pm
Now is the time for us to stand up against such bullying by “little napoleans” in the edu system! There are lots of them around, trust me and if we are not vigilant, it would be difficult to claim back our rights.
Here is another issue: having gotong royong or similar activities on Sundays. One educator (who wanted to stand up for her right to attending church service on Sun) pointed out that if Muslim men were allowed to leave early on fridays for prayers, why can’t she be given time off for service on Sun morning, was chided for bringing up “religious” issues by her boss and of course was sidelined for any promotion since!
So high time we make a diff in next elections people!!
#19 by scorpian6666 on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 4:10 pm
I was amazed on the enrollment of my daughter into Form One, I was told my the class teacher i “must” buy this “Packei Cooperative 2008″ which include some very heavily coloured cover exercise books, pencil, glue, drawing book and some other items which i am yet to receive (no list at all) i suppose, of value up to RM128.00. from the ??? school’s co-opertive stationary supplier.
I am told I can not even buy from my own uncle who is a stationary supplier !!!
What a way to do business ?
Soon every man would have to wear a songkok bearing an UMNO sign you could only buy from UMNO !!! Co-operative Society. NO OEM here please….
How much could these go on before “Malaysia” explode with chaos?
Maybe not ………..i remember when i was a child, I heard about chinese giving away their children to be adopted by Malay just for peace and stability and security…
There is a saying …. give an inch, they will ask for two .. How much more could they give in ???
#20 by Tickler on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 4:25 pm
Ah, there`s plenty more they can take:
Visit Malaysia Year – The ‘Korean scandal’
Syed Jaymal Zahiid | Jan 11, 08 3:52pm
The government had introduced the Visit Malaysia Year campaign to generate profit for the tourism industry, the spoils of which is to be shared by the nation.
RM850,000 promotional video
Minister implicated
http://malaysiakini.com/news/76949
#21 by AnakTiriMalaysia on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:02 pm
Compulsory wearing songkok?
Sorry, wearing songkok make my head itchy,,,
#22 by Jeffrey on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:03 pm
YB
Sorry slightly out of topic but are you aware of this happening, what a commenter Ahoo said in an earlier thread ” Songkok compulsory wear for JB English College prefects?” at this link :http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2008/01/11/songkok-compulsory-wear-for-jb-english-college-prefects/
Ahoo said, “With the school reopening, my girl (form 2) was moved from top 2 class to the class 5 out of 6 classes in total. Reason is that by placing her there to sit with the under achievers, teacher hopes to get her to guide her under achieving peers to do well ! â€
This is kind of educational social re-engineering is most unacceptable. I have posted my response to Ahoo’s comments in that thread.
(Thanks, Jeff, for drawing my attention. Most appreciated as with election temperature rising, may not be able to catch up with all the comments as fast I would like to do. – kit)
#23 by madmix on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:30 pm
Now they are going around bookshops confiscating children Christian books carrying pictures of prophets which offends Islam!!! Islam is so easily offended?? Children’s books have always illustrations of Moses, Abraham etc. What is so offensive about that? The books are not meant for Muslims so why take offense. Can one not teach one’s religion in peace without interference from talibans?
If that is the case, Christians are not to have pictures and statues of Jesus in Churches etc as Jesus is also a Prophet of islam!
#24 by optimuz on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:34 pm
YB Kit,
I’m not sure if I’m being paranoid here or that my instinct seems to tell me there is a greater effect for all this.
The latest issue I just found was this http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/76951.
Now, this seems to be the latest in a series of racial/religious issues that have surfaced lately. From the Allah controversy, to Indian workers ban, to songkok and segregation…
I can’t help but think that there is a sinister plot to use these issues to raise conflict among the races in this country, in light of the impending GE..
Could this be a ploy by those in power to re-enact the saddest moment of our history, 39 years ago?? Just to maintain the power??
I must be paranoid….or am I?
#25 by legalsabahan on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:43 pm
School, college and university is the place to educate, make our next generation more equipped with knowledge to face more challenging tomorow. But our government don’t really sems care about all this, KEEP ON RULING is mainly in their mind.
University Malaya is not even in the best 1000 university in the world!! I read some report, local university is not even in the best ONE THOUSAND list, my god!!
The University had quota for Bumi, not getting intakes their by their talent or qualification. We can see all the time in newspaper, all A student rejected by local University!!
If BN goverment wish to educate the next generation to be only yes man, why don close down all primary, secondary till university, only kindergarden are left. Then the teacher’s job is teaching all the children that, VOTE FOR BN?
#26 by Tickler on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:45 pm
Christians give up on Jesus:
Next they’ll be visiting your church and confiscating anything which depicts Jesus cos for the Muslim, Jesus is a prophet
and after that, if you’re a Catholic, they may even confiscate your crucifix.
You think that’s far fetched? Well, they’re already confiscating illustrated children’s books.
http://whatalulu.blogspot.com/2008/01/lulu-wants-to-see-books.html
#27 by Tickler on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:48 pm
First, Allah is theirs. Now so is Jesus.
You poor Christians. First they took away your rights to use Allah, now they take your right away to portray Jesus in any pictorial form because it offends the Muslims, as Jesus is also one of their prophets.
http://bytemuncher.blogspot.com/2008/01/first-allah-is-theirs-now-so-is-jesus.html
#28 by pky103 on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 6:48 pm
Imagine the non-Malays imposing their cultural values on the Malays – which is an utterly disrespectful act, as the State Education Ministry has proven to be.
#29 by chiakchua on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 7:07 pm
Not surprising, this is another IRS at work!
I – Incite. Put on Songkok.
R – Resolve. Ruling withdrawn due to protest by non-Malays.
S – Self praise; all problems can be resolved through the BN channel!
Monopolise use of the word ‘Allah’, but force you to use ‘songkok’; is this not narrow minded?
#30 by Billy on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 7:20 pm
Kit, there is one more to be added to your list. The latest, according to a press release from Malaysiakini today, there is a ban now on children bibilical story books which depict pictures of prophets. MPH bookstores have since been raided. Now how in the world are the churches going to conduct their Sunday classes for the little kids, I wonder?????? Day by day, I can feel the screw tightening around us non-Muslims, slowly but surely, and it is a matter of time before some thing gives, and I fear it will be sooner than we think, at the rate they are pushing us to the edge.
#31 by sybreon on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 7:54 pm
chiakchua: haha! you should read my blog about this phenomenon. It’s problem solving, the Malaysian way!
#32 by pulau_sibu on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 9:13 pm
Songkok is a symbol for orang melayu, but not for muslim.
#33 by Tickler on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 9:36 pm
Songkok is also taken as a substitute for the kopia which the muslims wear to prayers at mosques.
#34 by DarkHorse on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:04 pm
The songkok to the Malays is what the kippa is to the Jews.
So why are they asking the non-Malay non-Muslims to put on the songkok when Jews are proud to tell the world they are Jews and that others are not.
Does putting on the songkok mean you’re entitled to the 72 virgins at the Gates of Paradise?
#35 by DarkHorse on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:07 pm
“Day by day, I can feel the screw tightening around us non-Muslims, slowly but surely, and it is a matter of time before some thing gives, and I fear it will be sooner than we think, at the rate they are pushing us to the edge.”
The ship is sailing into unchartered waters here. I don’t think the captain knows what awaits him.
#36 by johan_my on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:19 pm
Back in my school days, there was an international scout jamboree that is to be held in Kem Maju in Taiping. I participated in the state contest and was selected to represent my state in this jamboree. In the instruction letters given to us prior to leaving for the jamboree, we were told to wear the songkok as part of the uniform. I was too young then to understand the implication. But on the day we left for the Jamboree by train, none of my other fellow scouts had songkoks with them.
Subsequent to that, the headgear was changed to be in the same colour scheme as the scarf and the songkok was discarded, although the shape of the new headgear has some resemblance to the songkok.
If schools want to have a standard headgear, they should go design one instead of adopting the songkok. And the headgear should be wearable by both genders.
#37 by year of snake on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:36 pm
The next thing this teacher will tell the prefect that if he does not want to wear the songkok, he should become a Sikh and wear a turban!
#38 by Anba on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:51 pm
Dear Malaysians,
Congratulations to the parents who were brave enough to publish the story. I’m sure there are hundreds of cases like this throughout the country.
Please stand up for your right. I know there are many parents who may be afraid to speak up against in-justice. What are you waiting for? Are you waiting for death-bed to take take action. Action is in the present moment. Don’t postpone your action in voicing out.
Uncle Lim, I want to ask you a serious and honest question. Would you consider becoming the first non-Malay Malaysian prime minister. Do you envision DAP winning majority and you becoming a prime minister?
As I’m watching the USA presidential debates and caucus/primary elections ( elections done to elect the candidate for the Democrat and Republican parties) closely, I’m awestruck with the passion and composure of Barack Obama, the African American Democrat contender. He is expected to give Hillary Clinton a tough fight for the Democrat nomination. Although not an American, I feel strongly for the way he Obama speaks, as he speaks about restoring hope for the Americans. I feel motivated when I hear him speak. On the contrary, I feel so unmotivated following our local election ( which the idiot Khairy who asks everyone not to speculate the date of the election…such a born loser ). So, Uncle Lim, whats your answer to my question?
God bless Malaysia.
#39 by DarkHorse on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:52 pm
YB Kit would do well to take up the matter of the wearing of the songkok among non-Malays as a freedom of speech issue when he next appears in Parliament.
#40 by Old Geezer on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 10:55 pm
“This is kind of educational social re-engineering is most unacceptable. I have posted my response to Ahoo’s comments in that thread.
(Thanks, Jeff, for drawing my attention. Most appreciated as with election temperature rising, may not be able to catch up with all the comments as fast I would like to do. – kit)” – Jeffrey
Before you all get excited, note that it is a common practice in public schools in the U.S. to do that. In order to have diversity and to avoid discrimination, every class has both good and underachiever, as well as rich and poor kids. It does not prevent a good student from excelling.
Just ask yourself, is it fair for the teacher to teach poorly just because your kid is an underachiever? How would you prevent that? The solution is to mix up the class. Note that I never use the term “stupid” for the children.
Of course, in the US, you can also send your kids to private school but then there is also no guarantee that they will be among the top achievers. It is all relative.
#41 by DarkHorse on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 11:03 pm
How is it that male school prefects in the school are asked to wear the songkok but nothing is required of the girls? Should they as school prefects also be made to wear the ‘hijab’ or tudung as it is commonly referred in Malaysia?
#42 by cheng on soo on Friday, 11 January 2008 - 11:25 pm
May be a way to go around this, like the concerned parent suggested, is to get many non malay , non muslim males wear songkok n sarong, kissing keris, eat pork, drink bear, hold hand with their wives (wear kebaya n tudung) frequently in public, eat openly at day time during fasting month.
Then they may be like the ‘all…” case, ban non muslim non malay, to wear songkok, sarong, kebaya, tudung or carry keris, etc.
#43 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:04 am
//Is it fair for the teacher to teach poorly just because your kid is an underachiever?// No one says that the poor standard should be assigned to underacheievrs or that teacher should teach poorly under achievers. By all means get good teachers to go there to teach under achievers but why get acheivers to go there especially when classes have been classified from good to not so good? What is the incentive for students to be achievers when as reward for achievement is to be assigned to the under achievers class? Is it the job of the student achievers to teach the under achievers?
#44 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:05 am
Typo correction – “….the poor standard teachers should be assigned to underachievers or that…”
#45 by borrring on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:13 am
Well, if u must know, orientation for non muslim (S’wak & Sabahan) bumi students in UiTM for girls includes, wearing the baju kurung & tudung for the whole week. And to top that off, after orientation, you’re required to wear clothes that hides the butt & and not wear short sleeves/sleeveless shirts.
I’m wondering why these ppl are imposing their cultures on other people?
#46 by raven77 on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:24 am
If everyone doesnt stand up to this sought of bullying by half past six admin with their brainless little napoleans , then you must expect more of this rubbish…
#47 by Jonny on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:31 am
Year 2008. Year of the Rat.
I loathe the politikus the most. Misuse of power.
What are you all trying to do? Trying to bring up issues to cause the non-Muslims rise up? And then later incur insecurities in the Muslims that during election to strongly support UMNO??? (This was mentioned in Malaysia-today.net). Very possible.
I have a good suggestion here. What if all of non-muslims wear songkok for whole of next week?
Would the politikus then put a ban on wearing songkok by non-muslims when they felt threatened?
As in like using the word Allah which is too used in other religions for thousands of years?
We’ve gone to a state of giving more importance to superficial looks than the substance.
#48 by DarkHorse on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:37 am
“And to top that off, after orientation, you’re required to wear clothes that hides the butt & and not wear short sleeves/sleeveless shirts.”
How does one hide one’s butt??
#49 by DarkHorse on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 12:45 am
What’s in a songkok?
I tell you what’s in a songkok. You could hide explosive in your songkok. To board a plane in the U.S. you’d need to take them off to be examined.
That’s what in a songkok!
#50 by U32 on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 1:08 am
On one hand, they want to promote harmony. On another, they want the baju kurung which is very Malay, the songkok which is also very Malay and in the end what we have is cakap tak serupa bikin.