Do Malaysian Muslims understand what ‘Allah’ means?


The Other Malaysia
by Farish A. Noor
25 December 2007

At the time of writing this, I am in Cairo in the company of my Egyptian friends who are Muslims, Catholics and Copts. Eid has passed and I attended several dinners and celebrations where Muslims and Copts celebrated together, visiting each others’ homes and ate til we could not eat any further. What is worse, Christmas is upon us and so once again Muslims, Catholics and Copts will be heading for the communal table for the communal feast and there will be much licking of chops, munching of bread, gobbling of sweet deserts and drinking for everyone. It is all simply too pleasant to belive, yet it is real and this is what life is like for many in Cairo, the ‘Mother of civilisation’ and home to more than twenty million Egyptians from all walks of life.

What is most striking to the outside observer like me – though rather banal for the Egyptians themselves – is the fact that in all these celebrations ranging from Eid for the Muslims to Christmas for the Catholics and Copts the word ‘Allah’ is used to denote that supreme and singular divinity, God. Catholics and Copts alike exclaim ‘Masha-allah’, ‘Wallahi’, ‘ya-Rabbi’, ‘Wallah-u allam’, and of course ‘Allahuakbar’ day in, day out, everywhere they go. The coptic taxi driver blares out ‘By Allah, cant you see where you are parking??” as he dodges the obstable ahead. The Catholic shopkeeper bemoans “Ya Allah, ya Allah! You can only offer me two pounds for the scarf? Wallahi, my mother would die if she heard that! Ya-Rabbi, ya-Rabbi!”

Yet in Malaysia at the moment yet another non-issue has been brewed to a scandal for no reason: The Malaysian Catholic Herald, a publication by and for Catholics in the country, has been told that it can no longer publish its Malaysian language edition if it continues to use the word “Allah” to mean God. Worse still, the country’s Deputy Internal Security Minister Johari Baharum recently stated that “Only Muslims can use the word Allah” ostensibly on the grounds that “Allah” is a Muslim word. The mind boggles at the confounding logic of such a non-argument, which speaks volumes about the individual’s own ignorance of Muslim culture, history and the fundamental tenets of Islam itself.

For a start, the word ‘Allah’ predates the revelation to the Prophet Muhammad and goes way back to the pre-Islamic era. Christians had been using the word long before there were any Muslims, in fact. Furthermore the word is Arabic, and is thus common to all the peoples, cultures and societies where Arabic – in all its dialects – is spoken, and is understood by millions of Arabic speakers to mean God, and little else. One could also add that as “Allah” is an Arabic word it therefore has more to do with the development and evolution of Arabic language and culture, and less to do with Islam. It is hard to understand how any religion can have a language to call its own, for languages emerge from a societal context and not a belief system. If one were to abide by the skewered logic of the Minister concerned, then presumably the language of Christianity (if it had one) would be Aramaic, or perhaps Latin.

The Minister’s remark not only demonstrated his shallow understanding of Muslim culture and the clear distinction between Arab culture and Muslim theology, but it also demonstrated his own lack of understanding of the history of the Malays, who, like many non-Arabs, only converted to Islam much later from the 13th century onwards. Among the earliest pieces of evidence to indicate Islam’s arrival to the Malay archipelago are the stone inscriptions found in Malay states like Pahang where the idea of God is described in the sanskrit words ‘Dewata Mulia Raya’. As no Malay spoke or even understood Arabic then, it was natural for the earliest Malay-Muslims to continue using the Sanskrit-inspired language they spoke then. Surely this does not make them lesser Muslims as a result?

The ruckus that has resulted thanks to the threat not to allow the publication of the Malaysian language edition of the Christian Herald therefore forces observers to ask the simple question: Why has this issue erupted all of a sudden, when the word Allah was used for so long with narry a protest in sight? At a time when the Malaysian government is already getting flak as a result of the protests by Malaysian Hindus who insist that they remain at the bottom of the economic ladder despite fifty years of independence, now it would appear as if the Malaysian government cannot get enough bad publicity.

The administration of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi came to power on the promise that it would promote its own brand of moderate Islam that was pluralist and respectful of other cultures and religions. But time and again the Malaysian public – first Hindus and now Christians – have felt necessary to protest over what they regard as unfair, biased treatment and the furthering of an exclusive brand of Islam that is communitarian and divisive. The latest fiasco over the non-issue that is the name of God would suggest that Prime Minister’s Badawi’s grand vision of a moderate Islam has hit the rocks, and is now floundering. Just how the ministers and elite of this government is to regain their course is open to question, but what is clear is that some Ministers should get their basic knowledge of their own religion in order first.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by kaybeegee on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 10:58 am

    Shamsul annuar, remove the blinkers and you will see light.
    As a non Muslim, I cant mention your God’s name. Fine with me. I have also prohibitted my young kids from doing so lest they be arrested for mentioning your God’s name. I teach my kids to switch off the tv when your religion’s programme is shown, lest my kids hear your God’s name.
    My friend who had wanted to convert to Islam, (to get married, and that is his truth)now has a dilemma. Unless and until my friend mentions your God’s name he cant be accepted as a Muslim. But until he is accepted as a Muslim he as a non Muslim cant mention your God’s name.

    The next issue is about this Independence of Malaysia. Cant you understand that Malaysia was created, was formed? Malaya is now history. But to confine Malaya to history would mean that UMNO and their co called struggle for iNdependence would be irrelevant. So UMNO persists by saying 50 years of INdependence. Now what struggle was there by UMNO for the Independence of

    MALAYSIA? Malaysia was formed, was created dont you understand? It is only the UMNO and yopu who say that Malays form the largest ethnic Minority. But this country had been diiiiivided into Malays and non Malays, Muslims and non Muslims, would you say it is 50:50?
    With a definition of Malay like in the constitution andbody can be a Malay, whites, blacks brown, yellow, all colours of the rainbow.
    No wonder Malays cannot disappear from the face of this earth.

  2. #2 by shamshul anuar on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 - 10:19 pm

    Dear Kaybeegee.

    I refer to your remarks. I fail to understand your point. What exactly you were trying to say. And with due respect to you, get the facts right. And be critical, not paranoid.

    Please enlighten me who forbids you to listen to the word “Allah”. And to convert into Islam is simple. Just say the “syahadaH” meaning accepting Allah as the God and Prophet Muhammad is His messenger.

    And what is it with you that you are unable to accept the truth that UMNO is instrumental is getting independence for Malaya.

  3. #3 by kaybeegee on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 - 12:58 am

    Shamsul, UMNO alone was not responsible for getting the Independance of Malaya. But that is not the point here. The question is that of Malaysia. Malaysia did not get her Independence. Malaysia was formed, was created. Where is UMNO’s struggle for the creation of Malaysia?
    To say the syahadah one must mention your God’s name which non Muslims are prohibted. UMNO must now make more rules as to the exception to when and how non Muslims can mention your God’s name.
    Strange Saudara Shamsul that you should say that the Kuran(sic) mentions “not to mock OTHER faiths(capital letters mine). Does this mean that the Koran recognises other faiths, which must means religions pre Islam? Christianity as preached by Jesus?
    “Give instruction to a wise man and he will yet be wiser”

  4. #4 by kaybeegee on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 - 1:12 am

    By the way Saudara Shamsul, we the non Malays are not confused about race and religion. We know the difference between the two. When we inter marry our children will follow the father’s race. religion can be the father’s if it differs from the mother’s or none at all’
    But not the Malays. because you are defined a malay if you fall within the definition of Malay in the sacred federal constitution.
    Your race and your religion go together. We have no problems with that.
    But the farce lies when say an Indian Man converts to Islam and instead of being classified Indian Muslim, his children by his Malay wife are Malays! But if this Indian convert to Islam marries Meenachi convert to Islam what race will their offspring be?
    So the confusion to race is UMNO, the Government’s making.
    Imagine children of white males convert to Islam are Malays? Yet at ttime of birth the baby can only cry, let alone speak the Malay language.
    Just in passing Saudara, a white Muslim, told me what is the problem with the Malay language? He speaks English resepelled.So he is speaking Bahasa Malaysia.
    Whatever is said here Saudara, we are friends.

  5. #5 by shamshul anuar on Thursday, 17 January 2008 - 11:02 pm

    DEar Kaybeegee.

    Many thanks for your questions. Islam recognises the existence of other religions. Muslims are reminded to respect the belief and tradition of other religions.

    As for Jesus, he is recognised as a prophet , not as the God. Muslims accord him high regards. Even a chapter of Kuran is named after Lady Mary( Mariam). However, Muslims do not agree with the concept of trinity. Kuran clearly said that in one of the verses. The verse said that ” …And We do not give birth to someone…”. And Muslims are reminded that nobody knows Allah’s physical attributes.

    And I beg to differ. Nobody can stop non Muslims from uttering the word “Allah”. What is prohibited is using the name for purposes of religions other than Islam. Actually, it is quite simple.

  6. #6 by kaybeegee on Friday, 18 January 2008 - 5:53 pm

    Thank you. Your explanation of the usage of your God’s name makes more sense than the Ministers’.

  7. #7 by sosmalaysia on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 - 1:43 am

    dear all n sundry,
    please i challenge u all to pray to your god sincerely n ask him whether he is happy with all your “protecting” and limiting the use of “GOD” in whatever names. Ask n wait for HIS answer, not listen to yr imaginary answer. Thw true GOD will deliver his reply to your confused minds to stop inciting quarrels on “monopolising” god in whatever format. GoD forbids.

Comments are closed.