MIC President and sole Indian Cabinet Minister for more than 28 years, Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu announced that the Prime Minister has asked him to monitor all Hindu temples and submit a report on their status periodically.
He said the Prime Minister also wanted the MIC to forward to him and the Cabinet a list of temples that might have to be demolished for various reasons.
In declaring that the MIC “will completely take over” the sensitive issue of Hindu temples, several observations and questions are in order.
Firstly, is this an election gimmick until the next general election expected in March is over – when the various State Governments will again assert their untrammeled power and authority like the arbitrary, high-handed and insensitive demolition of the of the Sri Mariamman Temple at Padang Jawa in Shah Alam a few days before Deepavali?
Secondly, is there a total moratorium and halt on the demolition of Hindu temples, and if so, for what period – is it only until the next general election?
Thirdly, if Samy Vellu is now given additional responsibilities and powers by the Prime Minister on the question of Hindu temples in the country, he must thank Hindraf and he should ask the Prime Minister to release all the five Hindraf leaders under the Internal Security Act immediately and unconditionally – and they should be charged in court and be given their fundamental right of an open trial to defend themselves to any charges that the Attorney-General wants to prefer against them.
It is moot however that this latest announcement is going to reverse Samy Vellu’s political fortunes, who is akin to the Chinese saying of a “a rat running across the street with everybody shouting ‘smack it’”.
A Malaysiakini correspondent writing about the public booing of Samy Vellu when officiaiting the Astro’s ‘Aattam 100 Vagai’ (100 types of dance), an international modern Indian dance competition, at the Penang International Sports Arena (Pisa) on Sunday, entitled his report: “Writing on the wall for MIC supremo”.
Some 40 months ago, I had given Samy Vellu an opportunity to redeem himself, MIC and the Barisan Nasional Government by embarking on the process to check and arrest the long-standing political, economic, educational, social, cultural and religious polarization of the Malaysian Indians in the country.
This was when I suggested to Samy Vellu that he get Cabinet approval for the establishment of a Parliamentary Select Committee on the Marginalisation of the Indian Community, with him as Chairman, to identify the problem areas faced by Malaysian Indians for over two decades which have denied them an equal place under the Malaysian sun, to be followed by a New Deal to restore justice and fair play to the Malaysian Indians.
I even wrote an official letter to Samy Vellu, dated 4th June 2004, which I handed to him personally in Parliament at a meeting of the Parliamentary Committee of Selection.
Samy Vellu expressed great enthusiasm and full support for my proposal at the time and promised to raise it at the Cabinet – but nothing has come out of it. He has not breathed a single word about my letter and proposal in the past 40 months.
I do not know whether he had just thrown my letter into the wastepaper basket when I turned my back, but Samy Vellu had flunked the opportunity to end the marginalization of Malaysian Indians 40 months ago or he would not now be like “a rat running across the street with everybody shouting ‘smack it’”!
This is the letter which I gave Samy Vellu, which I am making public for the first time:
“4th June 2004,
Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu,
MIC President and Works Minister,
Parliament.
YB Datuk Seri,
Select Committee on Marginalisation of Indian Community in Malaysia
We are in the era of a more open, accountable and democratic government with the agreement by the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister for the establishment of two Select Committees, one to address the problem of increase in sex crimes through amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code and the other, a Select Committee on National Unity and Integration, with its first agenda a review of the national service training programme.
Even more important and significant is the developing consensus between the government and the opposition on the need for a “First World Parliament” if the Prime Minister’s aspiration that the “First World Infrastructure, Third World Mentality” Malaysian malaise obstructing the nation from becoming a fully developed nation is to give way to a “First World Infrastructure, First World Mentality”.
Long-overdue parliamentary reform and modernization to effect a more activist and hands-on Parliamentary institution, such as embracing the Select Committee system which has become common-place in First World Parliaments in the Commonwealth, deserve the strong and vocal endorsement from all quarters particularly Cabinet Ministers.
I am seeking YB’s support for the establishment of a third Select Committee, viz. on the marginalization of the Indian community which have not received commensurate benefits from decades of national development – an issue which deserves the concern of all Malaysians, regardless of community and political affiliation.
YB knows better than me about the crisis of Indian marginalization in the national development process, and there is no need for me to enumerate them, although an NGO had recently summarized the long-standing fundamental issues faced by Indian Malaysians, including the following:
• The number of Indian youths dying in police custody has increased;
• The socio-economic inequality between the Indian poor and rich and between other communities has worsened;
• The State has not responded effectively in addressing social ills in the community;
• The State policies towards and financial allocations for Tamil schools remains pitiful;
• The University intake policy has been a source of major distress for the community;
• Low cost housing needs of the Indian poor have not been adequately addressed;
• The negative consequences of the final breakdown of the plantation economy on the Indian rural poor have still not be regulated. Aggressive displacement of the Indian Malaysians is a serious problem.
A Select Committee on the marginalization of the Indian community in the national development process will be the most opportune and appropriate forum for a full ventilation of this national problem to find a formula to break the back of this crisis, with the support of all concerned players rising above party differences and partisan interests.
YB will be the most ideal Chairman for the Select Committee on the Marginalisation of the Indian community in the development process and DAP MPs are prepared to give full support and make the fullest contribution if the Cabinet could agree to its establishment.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
(Lim Kit Siang)
Ketua Pembangkang”
The offer of co-operation 40 months ago by DAP MPs to Samy Vellu, the MIC and the Barisan Nasional government, rising above party differences, to work in unison to end the long-standing marginalization of the Malaysian Indians was spurned and rejected.
What a golden opportunity lost – with Samy Vellu, Malaysian Indians and the nation as a whole all become the losers.
If the long-standing problem of the marginalization of the Malaysian Indians had been highlighted and addressed by a Parliamentary Select Committee 40 months ago, the feeling of neglect, alienation and despair would not have reached the stage where 30,000 Indians from all over the country braved hardships and threats to rally in support of the Hindraf demonstration in Kuala Lumpur on Nov. 25 in a collective cry of desperation to be heard by the Prime Minister and the Barisan Nasional government.
Can Samy Vellu explain why he had spurned my proposal for the establishment of a Parliamentary Select Committee on the Marginalisation of the Indian community in Malaysia 40 months ago?

#1 by DarkHorse on Friday, 28 December 2007 - 10:28 am
Chinese in Sg. Siput are traditionally BN supporters except for the younger ones who are not registered to vote.
#2 by Jimm on Friday, 28 December 2007 - 11:50 am
In BN, everyone know what is the main plot to be in the government and what saves them at the end of the day.
SV have been the best nominated candidate representing Indians majority and he have proven to be able to control the entire community through the last 28 years without much major issues.
Like UMNO, once awhile MIC also have to do some wayng kulit to spiked their own kind and then come out with a working plan to resolve them which normally take place around the GE period.
AS for as I can see, SV will stay for another term as no one else from Indian community are good enough to even be his student.
#3 by Bigjoe on Friday, 28 December 2007 - 4:31 pm
I can’t recall another time when MIC, IPF and PPP came together to work on any issue together. It looked like signs of panic across their faces when these bitter rivals want to work together. Rats in panic together.
But is it a formula for real cooperation or will the pressure break them apart openly? All it takes is for one rat to decide he wants more of the cheese than others think he is entitled to and mayhem will ensue.
In the end, they will look to Badawi to give them enough goodies to spread around which may not be around given that MCA also wants more and UMNO is always greedy. The problem is that all of them want more than usually given out and if not enough is given out, they will never agree on who should get how much. So Badawi getting all these parties to work together? He is overestimating his leadership ability again.
#4 by benny on Friday, 28 December 2007 - 7:04 pm
I hve learn something for this GE,convince as many people to VOTE FOR OPPOSITIONS.WE NEED TO BREAK THAT 2/3 OF BN.
#5 by Tickler on Saturday, 29 December 2007 - 12:09 pm
I want to add the News that came out In makkal osai today 27th Dec 2007,
Its Front Page News with a warning from Samy Vellu
(A talk during prayers at batu gajah temple)
Those who have challenged me have gone into the ground and have been destroyed. Today I am keeping quiet and looking at the abuses hurled upon me, Do not think I am a fool. I know how to protect myself. I know the newspapers that are attacking me. At the right time I will sue them in court. At that time they will learn their lesson. God is wacthing me and the abuses hurled by the people. I am not stupid to let people to keep on attacking me! who are they who want me to resign? Let my voters tell me to resign. I have a job to do. Do not waste my time telling me to resign. It will never happen as long as my voters vote for me. I am going to go from Town to town to explain to the masses about our struggle.
that was frontline news on the same newspaper which was attacking him. Of course, then again they too have much evidence against him. Another headline was of a former MIC strongman telling samy
Choose a PERSONAL WEALTH OR COMMUNITY!
http://jelas.info/2007/12/26/samy-anwar-the-kg-rawa-temple/#comments
#6 by DarkHorse on Sunday, 30 December 2007 - 8:03 am
It is time to introduce law to limit any one individual to hold political office for too long. Why?? Because power corrupts. No ‘ifs’ no ‘buts’ because there is no exception to it.
#7 by DarkHorse on Sunday, 30 December 2007 - 8:25 am
“Having said the above, the government should consider taking the initiative to heal the communal rift and foster the national reconciliation.” Jeffrey
You’re realistic in your analysis – insightful. But I do not share your sense of optimism. I do not think this government is about to give up or even share power.
#8 by prelude3372 on Monday, 31 December 2007 - 11:12 am
Before Samy took over MIC…we had many Indians in Government Sector, many Indians in Education sectors, and many more…what do we have now??
A success or failure of a leader is measured by what improvement he has brought to his community. When we say we are 50 years behind. That’s means (for those who have brain to thinks…MIC excluded from these brain people), our social economic condition compares to the other community is 50 years behind.
For those in MIC (which have low level of intelligen), what we maent is that 50 years ago you can only afford to ride bicycle and the majority of the other races also can afford to ride bicycle only. This means, we are in par with the other races in term of our living condition. 50 years later, majority of Indians can only afford to own motorcycle, than we are better condition than Indians 50 years ago that ride bicycle.
But when the other races in majority can afford cars and yet Indians can only afford motorcycle, than we are behind in term of social economic compare with other races. We used to be on par with other races, now we are far behind other races.
That’s means we were 50 YEARS BEHIND.
#9 by prelude3372 on Monday, 31 December 2007 - 11:13 am
It should be ” For those in MIC (which have low level of intelligent)”