Last night when you asked who was the one that cancelled his flight to attend, sorry i did not acknowledge. Was shy. Not used to standing up in a big crowd.

But anyway, I agree with that guy who called you ‘Datuk Seri’. You have sacrificed tremendously for the nation. You are more than a Datuk Seri in our hearts.

God bless you, Kit.

[Most appreciated. Hope we can meet up very soon. - kit]

If they have the evidence to prove it, victims who suffered because of the gas and the chemical-laced water through their indiscriminate use could initiate legal action against the police for damages. It is not going to be easy because those who were there had earlier been warned and had ignored police warnings. The refusal of a police permit meant that the assembly was not legal and those injured were participants of an illegal assembly. If the matter were to go to court the balancing of private and public interest would mean that litigants would be wasting their time and money pursuing claims which are lost before they are even adjudicated.

Do you have evidence to prove that the police were guilty of criminal negligence in the use of dangerous substances when doing crowd control?

It would make sense if there is a right of judicial review of the police decision not to issue the permit. Otherwise it was a case of putting one more nail into the coffin when the coffin has been closed shut and nailed and ready to be moved.

Is there a right of judicial review here?

GET READY, THE PARLIAMENT WILL BE DISOLVED NEXT WEEK .

PROOF TO BN THAT THE PEOPLE ARE INCHARGE .

Police is there to protect and maintain the peace and security right?

If people want to have a rally, they need to get a police permit I believe.

On the Nov 25th rally, the police denied the permit and then they went one step further. They went to the courts to get an order making the gathering an illegal assembly. Something does not seem right here.

If a member of the public went and made a police report and then went to the courts to get the gathering ruled as illegal, I would be able to understand it. But this was done by the police and no one highlights this fact. Do they accept these acts?

And anyway, if a member of the public did so, it would take him time to get the order from the court. How were the police able to move mountains in such a short space of time?

Anyway, for the police to be the ones to issue the approval for the gathering and for them to be the ones to go to court to get it declared as an illegal assembly does not seem right, when it was a peaceful gathering.

Why are there no publicity of the gross abuse of power by the police on 25th Nov? Were correct procedures followed? Did the police decieve those assembled by their deeds and words?

Was correct procedure used in discharging the chemical laced water and tear gas canisters?

Why nothing? But I guess, without a proper IPCMC bill, nothing can be done anyway. With the SCC, they will just shoooo all the reports away.

1) Stabbing of a teen for a piece of jewelry
2) At least two extortion of joggers in the morning.
3) At least two cars broken into.
4) A burgalry
5) A laptop and handheld organizer/phone stolen

This meeting should go on even if its just for the public to vent frustration.

If I were a juror about to deliver a verdict and after listening to the judge instructing me on the meaning of ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’, I would say there would be an empty auditorium.