The explanation by the Barisan Nasional MP for Parit Sulong Syed Hood Syed Edros defending his proposal to remove the crosses and images in missionary schools has compounded his offence, not only because of his recalcitrance but his totally unapologetic stance.
Syed Hood said he raised the issue to seek clarification from the Education Ministry based on grouses on the ground.
He said: “Times have changed and I think that we cannot allow Malays to look at the crosses and statues without explanation.”
What type of an explanation is this which not only reflects his petty-minded but highly offensive attitude to all fair-minded Malaysians who accept Malaysia as a plural society of diverse races, religions, cultures and languages.
A study of Syed Hood’s offending speech in Parliament on Oct. 29 will show that he was not seeking clarification but making baseless assertions –as recorded in the parliamentary debate on Oct. 29 in the Hansard (pp142-144):
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: … Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingin menyentuh satu perkara tentang Kementerian Pelajaran iaitu sekolah-sekolah mubaligh seperti Convent, La Salle, Methodist dan sebagainya. Saya difahamkan Lembaga Pengarah di sekolah-sekolah ini sebahagiannya ditadbir dari gereja-gereja di luar negara seperti di Vatican City. Saya juga difahamkan permohonan untuk membina surau di sebahagian sekolah-sekolah ini terpaksa mendapat kebenaran daripada Lembaga Pengarah yang mana Lembaga Pengarah ini sebahagiannya ditadbir oleh gereja.
Jadi amat memalukanlah, bagi diri saya, tentang pentadbiran sekolah-sekolah ini yang masih lagi dikawal oleh pihak gereja. Begitu juga saya difahamkan tentang iklim sekolah-sekolah tersebut, banyak ibu bapa Islam menghantar anak-anak mereka ke sana, mereka kompelin sebab ada kalanya sekolah dimulakan dengan lagu-lagu gereja. Ini saya tidak tahu benar atau tidak, tetapi ia apa yang saya dapat daripada ibu bapa sendiri tetapi yang jelas di sekolah-sekolah ini terpampang simbol-simbol agama. Saya rasa kecewa di dalam negara Islam, Malaysia ini, kalau saya pergi ke sekolah convent, ada terpampang patung St. Mary di depandepan sekolah convent…
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: [Bangun]
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: Silakan Yang Berhormat bagi Sri Gading.
Timbalan Yang di-Pertua [Datuk Dr. Yusof bin Yacob]: Ya, Yang Berhormat bagi Sri Gading.
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: Bagi saya sudah tidak terkejut, Yang Berhormat bagi Parit Sulong, cerita ini… [Disampuk] Bukan soal biasa. Soalnya kenapa boleh berlaku seperti ini? Satu. Hari Raya yang lepas, saya diberitahu oleh seorang bapa, waktu Aidilfitri disambut, sekolah jenis-jenis ini tidak ditutup. Terima kasih.
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: Bukan sahaja patung, tetapi Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat pergilah, tengoklah salib Kristian diletakkan di depan-depan sekolah. Saya tidak faham Kementerian Pelajaran, adakah pegawai-pegawai tidak nampak atau memang dasar kita membenarkan perkara ini. Walau bagaimanapun, saya sebagai orang yang bertanggungjawab kepada diri saya, agama, bangsa dan tanah air ini, saya menyatakan pendirian saya bahawa patung-patung ini hendaklah dirobohkan, salib-salib ini hendaklah dimusnahkan dan pengaruhpengaruh gereja di sekolah-sekolah ini hendaklah dihentikan. Begitu juga dana yang dikumpulkan di sekolah-sekolah ini. Adakah kita mendapat laporan? Kalau boleh kementerian mendedahkan dana sekolah-sekolah ini. Saya difahamkan ada sekolah-sekolah ini juga ditaja oleh pihak-pihak gereja. Dana-dananya datang daripada gereja-gereja dan adakah pihak kementerian pantau sumber-sumbernya? Adakah audit-audit dilaksanakan?
Syed Hood made a very clear call for the removal of the crosses, demolition of the Christian statues and an end to church influence in mission schools including alleged control by Vatican, questioning their contribution and loyalty to Malaysia.
The two UMNO MPs are given 48 hours to apologise for their baseless, misleading and offensive statements in Parliament casting adverse reflection on the contribution and loyalty of mission schools to Malaysia or a motion to refer them to committee of privileges will be tabled next week.
#1 by smeagroo on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 3:25 pm
MAybe what he meant was that it is a sin to look at crosses but ok to look and oogle at women and in some cases some MPs will term is as “Tunnel Vision”.
#2 by smeagroo on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 3:26 pm
And this Syed the Hooded man,if u cant bear to look at a cross, may I suggest all Christians to start bearing your cross and wear it wherever you go.
#3 by Ghost on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 3:48 pm
Blinds lead the blinds, what’s new? My way out, don’t follow, don’t lead, just be as useless as possible, dejecting participation into this deluded societies which favoring the blinds. Let them be, let them rot, let them learn.
#4 by optimuz on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:03 pm
first and foremost, this is not negara Islam.
Second, this guy is not even malay…but then the saying these days is that, ‘ kalau masuk islam, ertinya masuk melayu’. But thats irrelevant anyway..but it goes to show to what lengths these ‘converts’ would play to the crowd to gain some political mileage.
third, the Vatican City??…sheesh! too much of Da Vinci Code here..
fourth, if you want to complain about mission schools bearing crosses and statues and hymns etc…what about the never ending Quranic verses in schools, endless doa selamats and subtle Islamization??…whats good for the goose, surely is good for the gander as well, no?
fifth, take the cross away…but faith remains..unlike you guys, you pride yourself in appearance rather than substance…you are so insecure that a simple cross could threaten your faith..
The cross has stood the test of time…indeed, it shall still prevail..not so much the cross, but the faith that goes with it!
#5 by lakshy on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:23 pm
They wont apologize. So forget the 48hr wait.
Chinese schools better watch out! Your canteens serve pork! That will be next on the menu because many malay students now study in chinese schools!
Ahhh there goes the char siew and lapcheongs etc from school canteens!
#6 by lakshy on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:27 pm
Indian shops with pictures of Deities faced problems some months ago. I guess this will start happening more frequently now.
[deleted]
#7 by lakshy on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:32 pm
There seems to be a systematic effort to upset the non-Malays. Is it in order to “force” more non-malays to elave the couontry?
Perhaps with a higher malay %, it would be easier to make changes and force things through. Amend the constttion, re-write history etc, not that its not being done already.
With more eductaed ones leaving there could be less opposition from those who remain.
So should the non-malays just pack up and leave? Or should we make bn pack up and leave?
#8 by mendela on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:37 pm
Our neigbour Indonesia is holding the 12-day conference of parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) now in Bali! Bali is a resort with big Hindi influences and most of Bali people are Hindus.
This convention is a very big scale convention involving almost all countries in the world and yet Indonesians do not feel paranoid or uneasy at all in holding it in such a place.
Only in Malaysia you can find such stupid fanatics creating havocs and tension for its people and country.
#9 by grace on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:39 pm
“Times have changed and I think that we cannot allow Malays to look at the crosses and statues without explanation.â€Â
Y”B” Hood,
Please speak for yourself. The Malays are not stupid like you, hood.
They can think for themselves and are not easily inflenced by a simple cross.
Hey ! Why did you not ban broadcasting English football or European football? When Kaka scored a winning goal in World cup, he showed off his jersey bearing this ,”I belong to JESUS”.
Similarly most of the tiop players like Ronaldhino and most of them do the sign of cross when they score or about to enter the field! Hey! Please ban them for doing it!!!
#10 by iggy on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:43 pm
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]:
“..Saya rasa kecewa di dalam negara Islam, Malaysia ini, kalau saya pergi ke sekolah convent, ada terpampang patung St. Mary di depan sekolah convent…”
What happened to the stance where we’re so called an Islamic country but not in a theocratic sense ratified by so many? Syed Hamid Albar? DPM? PM?
See, this is the problem when we think that it’s just a bloody label and it won’t affect [deleted].
We get goons like these uttering points like so, using it in a theocratic manner,
Slowly indoctrinating us to think that we are truly, an Islamic country in a theocratic sense.
When we’re not.
“..Saya difahamkan ada sekolah-sekolah ini juga ditaja oleh pihak-pihak gereja..”
I’m sorry.
Wt is wrong with that?
Influence?
Our DPM and other various figures went to missionary schools.
You don’t see them straying away do you?
He then defended his case with this:
“Times have changed and I think that we cannot allow Malays to look at the crosses and statues without any explanation.”
Then give them [deleted] explanation la.
Geez!
What about your extravagant mosques and symbols littered everywhere in our country?
It’s explained(especially in school). Albeit I don’t agree with it. But we don’t go bitchin’ around and say that they have to be demolished?
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]:
“..Hari Raya yang lepas, saya diberitahu oleh seorang bapa, waktu Aidilfitri disambut, sekolah jenis-jenis ini tidak ditutup. Terima kasih.”
Oh me oh my,
What about UMNO general assembly during Deepavali?
I don’t know about this, but what about Islamic schools?
Are they closed during Gawai? Highly doubt it, Semenanjung doesn’t even celebrate Gawai.
Now why is that?
Is Gawai not Malaysian enough to celebrate?
Not enough dayaks or ibans in west Malaysia?
Does that make it any less Malaysian to celebrate?
Not surprising if west Malaysians don’t even know what Gawai is.
#11 by cheng on soo on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 4:43 pm
How about “Ini dunia berbilang kaum, agama, bahasa, & budaya, makanan, adat2. kalau U tak suka, U boleh keluar dari dunia ini”
#12 by Daniel Quah on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 5:19 pm
i can only ask those clown to shut up and stop raising religion issue in Parlimen…can’t they see that this is dividing our country? few person gain cause suffer to thousands!! if u afraid of cross…dont look at ….if Malays dont want to sing in the school…send to Islamic school…it is so easy…why make all the fuss about it? btw like mention, he is not original Malays…just a convertion..a convertion can have such influence..no wonder many those gomen convert…Islam teaching is a good teaching which stated tolerance of other religion …but seem that he is not reading his Islam teaching well enough to notice it..
#13 by burn on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 5:33 pm
time have changed???
they know, but they prefer to think of something else.
sudah 50 tahun merdeka, kaum kaum lain diketepikan.
sudah 50 tahun merdeka, kaum kaum lain masih di cop pendatang, sedangkan yang datang kemudian di cop bumiputra.
sudah 50 tahun merdeka, kaum kaum lain terpaksa membeli rumah dengan harga yang lebih.
sudah 50 tahun merdeka, kaum kaum lain terpaksa tunduk pada kemahuan BN UMNO.
sudah 50 tahun merdeka, kaum kaum lain telah di tipu dan di permainkan.
kaum kaum lain tidak minat dengan kerenah BN UMNO bersama ketuananya, maupun NEP.
yang buat bising selalu, BN UMNO!
yang memekik racist, BN UMNO!
yang buat provocation, BN UMNO!
yang buat membazir, BN UMNO!
yang buat cabaran pada kaum kaum lain, BN UMNO!
yang buat lesap, BN UMNO!
yang buat tak tahu, BN UMNO!
yang di buat bodoh, BN MCA, MIC dll….
#14 by lucia on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 5:45 pm
i can foresee the same old tune singing in our ears:
“the bloggers and opposition are playing up this issue. the opposition is out for a cheap publicity”.
*sigh* what else is new.
#15 by AsIseeit on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 5:51 pm
It is a case of stupid and unthinking intolerance of Muslim MPs.
What is the problem of having crosses in the school or even on the school badge. Does it not harm anyone? A good reason must be given for crosses to be taken out of school badges and schools.
For MPs such as these, the action the people must take is not to vote them in the next election. Raise what they have said as election issues in their constituencies where they are standing.
#16 by kurakura on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 5:59 pm
YB LIM,
Bersih has done it, Hindraf has done it. When is the Chinese’s turn? Although I would like to use the term Malaysian Chinese better.
kurakura
#17 by greatstuff on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 6:07 pm
What ever happened to the minds of a number of leaders in this country, for instead of growing in tandem and evolving with worldly develpoments over the past 50 years, theirs have become shrunken via their extreme narrow-mindedness, simplistic thinking, and idiotic untimely outbursts!
I believe that the evolutionist Charles Darwin would have had a challenging time studying this type of human individual, which is found in the arena of kampong style politics, and concluded that they are indeed a unique species that has stood still as time pased by.
#18 by vyriix on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 6:15 pm
As a Chinese saying goes, 挂羊头，å–狗肉, which means doing something different from what you preach.
This is very bad, and we actually no much different from Afghanistan’s demolishing Buddhist statues.
#19 by malaysia born on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 6:33 pm
Unless it has escape everyone else notices but as of now, there has been NO rebukes from any leaders of UMNO nor from the other component parties that make up “Be End”.
The quiet majority ???
By keeping quiet, i take it that the suggestion is ok with them?
Not doing anything is doing something.
#20 by MISHUGINA on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 7:09 pm
Yeah! lets break all the Virgin Mary statues and crosses in missionary schools. We’ve bulldozed countless heathen temples worshipping Krishna, next we’re gonna nuke Kuan Yin and Buddha statues out of this earth. Long live Islam Hadhari!
#21 by negarawan on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 7:20 pm
This is the corrupted UMNO way, they can break any laws they want for their selfish gains, but other cannot.
#22 by johan_my on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 7:37 pm
I thought sedition has no protection even in parliament. It appears to me that he is trying to generate a case that these schools are being managed by agents outside the country and that the building of suraus need approval from these agents. Notice too the use of “saya difahamkan” and “saya diberitahu”.
I am disappointed that the Christian MPs did not stand up and correct the perception.
Do I hear the de facto minister of law saying that these 2 will be charged under sedition act?
#23 by budak on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 7:50 pm
just tell them to +-x% off…
as long as the school produce good student who care about the cross… kalau tak suka balik pondok belajar lah… i think pondok is more suitable for him and his kids…
#24 by rolling stones on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:00 pm
Hello Uncle Kit and All
Have been reading all these comments about Mother Mary.
Please refer to the details below about Mother Mary from the Quran
A key female character in the Quran is Mary, the mother of Jesus and surah 19 is named after her:
When she was delivered, she said: “O my Lord! Behold! I am delivered of a female child!” – and God knew best what she brought forth – “And not wise is the male like the female. I have named her Mary, and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One, the Rejected.” [Qur'an 3:34]
God sent Gabriel to Mary to give her tidings of a son:
‘Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! God giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to God;”‘ [Qur'an 3:45]
The scripture also states that the conception of Jesus by Mary was miraculous:
‘She said: “O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?” He said: “Even so: God createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!”‘ [Qur'an 3:47]
“Mary the daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into (her body) of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of His Revelations, and was one of the devout (servants).” [Qur'an 66:12]
Mary is especially revered by many Muslims, and she is praised much by the Quran:
“Behold! the angels said: ‘O Mary! God hath chosen thee and purified thee – chosen thee above the women of all nations.’” [Qur'an 3:42]
#25 by rajanjohn on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:06 pm
This bunch of “Katak’s” and Clowns have nothing else more important to do for this country other then ONLY look into religious matters!
Like posted above..just becoz 1 Muslim student in Chinese school..they gonna ban pork!
So stupid la..send la your children to govt or some taliban conducted school..or to Kelantan !Oh ya..what about International Schools where the VIP’s children attend?What about University’s in Australia/US/Canada and other places where MARA sends thier students..are they sponsors and run by TALIBAN like U?
#26 by siudidi on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:41 pm
So what is it they want? A Taliban-brand education system? Asking all malay girls to cover up themselves in Burqas?
#27 by oknyua on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:46 pm
YB Lim, isn’t there more pertinent and urgent issues to be raised up in parliament?
The Cross and images; why do you feel so threatened Mr Syed Hood?
What has the Cross done to you, to your youths and to society? I am absolutely certain none of the Mat Rempit ended there because of the Cross.
#28 by boh-liao on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:48 pm
This is why our nation is wasting money doing unnecessary things, when Umnoputras do things and have ideas totally against the principle of a united multiracial and multicultural nation. There is no unity in diversity as Umnoputras are totally against diversity.
Why waste money, time, and energy to organise ‘National Service’ with the pretence of allowing young people of different races to come together, interact, share, and understand each other? Already we have so many practices that divide our people, from as young as when they are 12 years old.
As a nation, we are wasting so much of our time and energy on negative issues, one after another. How to move forward? One step forward and two steps back.
This is December 2007. Just sit back and think about the last 11 months. How many positive ‘feel good’ events or issues you can think of? How many negative ‘fed up’ events or issues you can think of?
At the rate crosses are eliminated from Malaysia, very soon travel agents will be organising trips to Singapore for some of our residents to see crosses or to celebrate Christmas – a boost to Singapore’s tourism!
#29 by borrring on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:56 pm
Who’s stirring religious sentiments now?
“Saya difahamkan Lembaga Pengarah di sekolah-sekolah ini sebahagiannya ditadbir dari gereja-gereja di luar negara seperti di Vatican City”
Oh, please….haven’t they heard of fund raising before? Do these schools need to get funds from the Vatican City? Never have I heard such nonsense coming from a such closed minded person. I’m a proud to say I’m was from a mission school & we didn’t need the Vatican City to keep the school afloat.
Surprisingly, my school was one of these mission schools in the area highly sought after by parents to send their children, regardless of their religions due to the fact that it was one of the best school around, academically speaking. Well-to-do families sent their children there despite there were some private schools around the area. Definitely, there were no singing of christian hymms, even though there’s a cross outside of the school hall, and never did I hear any conversions to christianity by muslim students by simply looking at the cross! And never did I hear about these students becoming a christian simply because they studied in mission schools!
It boggles the mind what these leaders were really thinking when they said what they said. Another cheap publicity stunt?
#30 by oknyua on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 8:57 pm
Just a thought, did Pa Lah call the two lawmakers and remind them that their comments are insensitive and seditious?
#31 by oknyua on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:02 pm
Before the Hindraf case is solved, another case surfaces. My bet another issue will float up next week. Damage control, damage control, damage control.
#32 by borrring on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:07 pm
Isn’t it funny that these 2 MPs brought up this matter just about when the christians are about to celebrate Christmas? Well, they have already picked on Hindus just when they were about to celebrate Deepavali…what next, the Buddhists? Beware, never pick on Muslims, cos they are overly “sensitive” :)
Don’t they have anything else more productive to say in parliment?
So, in UMNO’s terms, this is what we call “nation building”….
#33 by jzng89 on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:08 pm
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/12/5/parliament/19669655&sec=parliament
This article just bugs me way too much. I’m a proud student of St David’s high School. The fact that those two MPs even brought such an issue up is unthinkable. This is a direct violation to our constitution which states that we’re free to practice our own religion so long as we don’t preach to the Malays (Currently studying Pengajian Am in Form 6, so yea, have to know these things).
If their faith in our government has waivered, if they disagree with our constitution, they should just hand in their resignation! Missionary school’s aren’t fully aided and rely on themselves and the church to finance any undertakings. So by demolishing these statues, these emblems and symbols of the cross and so on, wouldn’t you think it best that the government just buy over ALL the missionary schools and turn them to government schools? This will only show the narrow mindedness of our government and affect the way other countries look at us.
I love my school, and I know a lot of people from other races, including Malays and Indians who love the school. So what exactly is the problem of having these symbols of religion on school grounds? We are after all under the aid of the church.
And FYI, in my 5 years there, we’ve never had the cross anywhere on our badges, the only crosses you’ll ever see is in the chapel of the school.
#34 by twistedmind on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:10 pm
Can someone please inform the investors from Intel/AMD/DELL and a long list of MNCs here in Malaysia, this is how OUR SUPER INTELLIGENT MPs and LAWMAKERS speak in Parliament. Take their business elsewhere, cuase Malaysian lawmakers will destroy and disrespect others religion !
After all, “If you don’t like it, you can leave!”
BTW. If I don’t like it, I can VOTE YOU OUT too, brudder.
#35 by jzng89 on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:12 pm
We’re moving back in terms of mentality, that’s that. You wouldn’t see such things 50 years ago.
#36 by ihavesomethingtosay on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:20 pm
[deleted]
place them under ISA
#37 by izrafeil on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:25 pm
kalau diistiharkan lambang salib mesti turun, lambang semua agama juga mesti turun, termasuk dan tidak terkecuali lambang bulan dan bintang!
#38 by takblhtahan on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:27 pm
2 actions proposed:
Action from all of us — since UMNO dont like the cross, lets not putting a cross to BN in next election.
Action for YB LKT — please check whether there is 666 on this joker’s head, I heard only devil hate cross.
#39 by negarawan on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:44 pm
If the great Tunku Abdul Rahman is still alive today, he would probably give a tight slap on the faces of Badawi, Mahathir, and all the BN “leadership”
#40 by undergrad2 on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:50 pm
This drive, if I could characterize it as such, to help Malays said to be suffering in some unknown ways from the sight of religious icons like crosses etc does not appear to be constitutional as it clearly goes against Article 11 of the Federal COnstitution of 1957.
It is true no one is being prevented from practicing his or her religion in such cases. But what about the spirit of the Constitution which protects the rights of non-Muslims to practice their own religion?
#41 by undergrad2 on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 9:56 pm
To the MP from Parit Sulong
who says “Times have changed and I think that we cannot allow Malays to look at the crosses and statues without any explanation.”
Times may have changed according to you but our Federal Constitution of 1957 Article 11 has not. Did you explain this to your constituents?
#42 by Fort on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:31 pm
50 years of islamisation! UMNO had been competing with PAS to see who is more Islam. They had not only remove crosses, they had changed the name of a school at Bandar Hilir, Melaka, from Convent of the Holy Infant Jesus to Infant Jesus Canvent.
#43 by babique on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:38 pm
It’s time for the opposition parties leaders to “unite” and fight against BN. Please compile all the reasons for not voting BN. Please list out all of the reasons for us to spread through our own network of friends and colleagues. Be quick.
#44 by LittleBird on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:39 pm
What 48 hours? saylah 2 days. You think me scarred? what can you do? in 48 hours so many things will happened and you will be busy with other issues.
My beloved leader will select me to stand another election so why worry? No issuelah..don’t stir religious sentiment!
wink wink..
p.s. do you think I got the qualification to be a BN MP?
#45 by ALtPJK on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:43 pm
The MP from Parit Sulong did not explain to his constituents. The reason for which cannot be any other than his total ignorance for the sanctity of the 1957 Constitution.
#46 by sudokuku on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:53 pm
The only other creature that I know is scare of cross is a vampire or “potianak†in BM, they come out only at night and suck the rakyat blood,
#47 by waterfrontcoolie on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 10:56 pm
These are the characters equipped with’x-ray’ eyes, especially when they see the female form. The images sent through these eyes have only pictures they had already perceived; they would not see reality because their brains whatever their contents, can see only what they have been dreaming day-in and day-out. So don’t be surprised by all the utterances that come out of the spouts. They are certainly incoherent to all normal thinking people. Don’t lose sleep over such trivial minds. The more such minds continue to be ‘owned’ by them, the faster they become irrelevant in the ‘flat’ world. Leave them to their ‘semi-round’ shell so that they can hibernate not only in winter but throgh all the moons that come by.
#48 by dapbestrong on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 11:19 pm
Shame on them, But as usual they don’t know what is shame. Saying things like this will only breed hatred among Malaysian. We must really VOTE THEM OUT! No Matter what it takes. We cant afford to let our children to suffer all the pains made by the BN’s Crooks. Guys, the TIME has arrived to use your vote wisely. Malaysia still has hope. never give up Keep up the good fight! Uncle Lim can do it, Lim goh tong can do it, Kevin rudd Can do it why not us?
#49 by smartee on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 11:31 pm
Empty Vessels makes the most noise… Who voted him in?
#50 by johneye on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 - 11:36 pm
DO NOT TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY!!
KNOW WHY
http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/index.php?itemid=833