Hindraf demo – Indian Parliament in uproar over Nazri’s outburst


Malaysian Ministers must get rid of the “frog in coconut shell” mentality and learn the first basic rule of global society — we must accept and withstand international scrutiny of national policies in the same way Malaysian leaders castigate injustices of other countries like the Palestinian and Iraq issues.

Only yesterday, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi spoke up for the Palestinians and criticized oppressive Israeli policies — and rightly so. Similarly, with the frequent Malaysian government criticisms of United States policy in Iraq.

However, Malaysian leaders cannot demand double-standards in international society where they exercise the right to criticize unfair policies of foreign governments like the hot-button Palestinian and Iraq issues and yet claim the privilege of being spared from international scrutiny by foreign governments and leaders on Malaysian events and developments.

This is why the outburst of the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz on Wednesday telling off the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi to “butt out” and not to interfere in Malaysian internal affairs for the Tamil Nadu leader’s comments on Sunday’s Hindraf demonstration is so ridiculous and out-of-place, as if the Malaysian government is insisting on the unilateral special rights of not being subject to any international scrutiny for its national policies while enjoying the liberty to speak out against international injustices like those affecting the Palestinians and Iraqis.

Nazri’s outburst at Karunanidhi’s call to the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to take immediate and appropriate action to end the “sufferings and bad treatment” of Tamils in Malaysia was given extensive coverage in the Indian media — just like the subsequent Karunanidhi’s reaction to Nazri’s outburst.

For instance, the Calcutta Telegraph in its report headlined “Malaysian courtesy: Lay off – Karunanidhi’s plea on Tamil rights sparks war of words” said:

Karunanidhi today said it was his “duty” to “defend” Tamils and he was prepared to accept any “punishment” for doing so.

Told about the comments of Aziz, the chief minister said: “If there is any punishment for doing the duty, I am prepared to accept it.”

Karunanidhi pointed out that he did not criticise the Malaysian government. “I don’t want to reply to his (Aziz’s) remarks. I don’t want to get into a tit for tat. It is my duty to defend Tamils.”

The Calcutta Telegraph also reported on the Indian Parliament scene on the Sunday Hindraf demonstration in Kuala Lumpur -

Today, MPs from Tamil Nadu disrupted both Houses of Parliament, demanding that New Delhi pressure Kuala Lumpur to protect ethnic Indians there.

Some MPs raised slogans against Malaysia and demanded the Indian foreign minister make a statement on the issue, forcing proceedings in the Lok Sabha to be suspended briefly.

“We have expressed our concern over the condition of Indian-origin Tamils in Malaysia,” said CPI leader D. Raja, who hails from Tamil Nadu.

“They are subjected to repression and discrimination. They are fighting for equality with other sections of Malaysian people.”

The Economic Times of India today also reported the “uproar” in the Indian Parliament caused by Nazri’s response to Karunanidhi.

It said Nazri’s remarks “created a ruckus in Parliament, with parliamentarians demanding that the government, which has remained silent on the matter, take up the issue with Kuala Lumpur.”

It reported:

Lok Sabha members from Tamil Nadu, cutting across party lines, on Thursday came out in full force to denounce the reported discrimination of ethnic Indians. Their noisy protest, which also got support from some other sections of the House, prompted the Speaker to adjourn the proceedings for half an hour.

Led by Congress member SK Kharaventhan, the agitated MPs spoke about purported ethnic discrimination against Indians, mostly people of Tamil origin, in Malaysia, and demanded that New Delhi address this issue immediately. As the members urged the central government to take steps to “protect” the ethnic Indians in Malaysia, Speaker Somnath Chatterjee, cautious of the diplomatic sensitivity involved in the matter, asked them not to say anything that would affect relations with the friendly country.

As their protest gained momentum, some members from the BJP benches were heard referring to the alleged demolition of temples in Malaysia. On his part, the Speaker ordered some reference to the reported police attack on the Indians. “We are a very responsible democracy. We don’t discuss… any other country in such a manner,” he said. ..

In the Rajya Sabha, too, Tamil Nadu MPs registered their protest, prompting deputy chairman K Rahman Khan to come out with an assurance that the government would definitely take note of it.

The BJP asked the government to raise the issue before the UN and the Commonwealth while the CPI expressed concern over “discrimination and repression’ of people of Indian origin.”

The Malaysian Government and Cabinet must be mindful of these international repercussions which must be fully taken into account in any decisions taken by the government and police in a proper handling of the Hindraf demonstration to ensure that they can withstand international scrutiny from all viewpoints whether nation-building policies or international best practices on democracy and human rights.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by Lee Wang Yen on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 12:30 am

    sorry. ..’ethic…’ should have been ‘ETHNIC’

  2. #2 by chgchksg128 on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 12:38 am

    Read what Bangkok Post columnist said of the Hindraf and racial discord in Malaysia.
    http://2hard2lie.blogspot.com

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 1:17 am

    Non interference of domestic affairs of sovereign nations is based on the principle of self determination widely accepted in international law & norm.

    If I were not mistaken, principle of self determination has its philosophical underpinnings in English philosopher, John Stuart Mill’s thoughts.

    Mill thought that a political community must struggle for freedom-whether successful or not ; that the internal freedom of a political community could only be achieved by its internal members ; that if the political system was oppressive, it was the responsibility of members of that political polity to change it whether by ballot or revolution.

    In the premises, if one chooses to remain a citizen in a country in which he is marginalized, he has to take the good and bad and is estopped from otherwise soliciting outside assistance based on ethnic solidarity.

    In today’s Globalised environment of free mobility, he could after all migrate and get out of his oppressed condition. The key is self determination, for being responsible for one’s situation – the necessary condition for and consequence in exercise of his freedom and free will.

    China, that overseas an expansive diaspora, seems to take this position on non interference, repudiating arguments based on ethnic solidarity as an exception if what malaysiatoday.com earlier said in his posting: December 1st, 2007 at 17: 30.06 may be relied upon as true – “Look at the Jakarta 1998 513 riot for example, China government classified it as a domestic affair and said no intervention from her part”.

    The limited recognized exception in interntional norm/law to non interference / principle of non intervention is (besides national self defence) compelling humanitarian imperatives to stop genocide and ethnic cleansing.

    That is the widely international norm expressed as it is – not what I think it should otherwise be.

  4. #4 by DarkHorse on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 6:57 am

    Good to hear from you Lee! We thought we lost you – just as we thought we had lost Jeffrey.

    You may be interested to know that your old adversary Tun Lim Kam Put the Cambridge wannabe is still at it – this time bashing Godamn Singh and Colonel on another read.

    If he so much as tries to be obnoxious again and reverts to name calling, we will come to your aid. One thing you must never do is stay away from this blog because of Tun Lim Kam Put from Kg. Attap – which was a major red light district in KL but has since been overtaken by Jln. Alor which he now frequents.

    We need your contribution on a regular basis on the very important issues being discussed here. Once in a while expect Tun Lim Kam Put to butt in on the discussions because “everybody else is stupid” according to him. Of course commentators here know better. Like Godamn Singh says, he could be an escapee from the psychiatric ward of some hospital and had run out of his medications.

  5. #5 by Lee Wang Yen on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 1:21 pm

    I can see your point about self determination. But this argument cuts both ways. If Nazri uses it to contend that the Indian government shouldn’t speak up because Indian Malaysians have a choice to leave, exactly the same reasoning can be used to argue that the Malaysian government should keep quiet on the Palestinian issue since they have a choice to leave.
    So I think Kit is right that there are enough parallels between the hindraf issue and the Palestinian issue (despite the disanalogies) that warrant the cry of double standards.

  6. #6 by ktteokt on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 3:27 pm

    So what is the purpose of the government setting up “Kementerian Perpaduan Negara” if they themselves do not believe in racial harmony and equality among races????

  7. #7 by shaolin on Sunday, 2 December 2007 - 6:07 pm

    ktteokt,

    It is set up just to show to the WORLD that such UNITY
    BOARD does exist in Malaysia; whether it is of USE is
    inmaterial..!!

    Important thing is: If UN carries out the audition, Ministry
    of HUMAN RIGHTs will NOT fail the AUDIT survey..!!

  8. #8 by Nick007 on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 8:36 pm

    To freenfairmalaysia,

    you quoted :

    “And of course, we don’t need any reminded that India is a nuclear power, one of very few and boasts the second largest army in the world, second only to China. Technically speaking, a full fledged row with Malaysia would last half a day, with the military capabilities of India including their huge array of fighter planes, navy vessels, submarines et al.

    My respond:

    Indian military spending not even in top 10 and not second only to China.

    1st: United states
    2nd: European union
    3rd: United Kingdom
    4th: France
    5th: China
    6th: Japan
    7th Germany
    8th: Russia
    9th: Italy
    10th: Saudi Arabia
    11th: India*

    It’s not by looking the population of one community and compared with the rest of the world but only the military capability itself.

    Perhaps indian is the biggest bragger in the world.

    Regards.

Comments are closed.