Semua sudah settle ya? Baik lah. We see what happens in the next election. You nak lari mana YB Cyclops?

You know lah, Loyar Buruk. :)

who care abt the riches; if everyone have a proper meal, job and fair treatment in the country..!

Furthermore he’s working for the RAKYAT not for the rich..! Can anyone ask this [deleted] to shut up…

Mohd Said said the Malays were not making a big fuss when it was reported that Chinese and Indians were among the richest in the country.

“We don’t demonstrate over the lack of Malays in the list of richest people in Malaysia.”

If you have severe difficulties putting food on the table, what does it matter if one of your own race is Ananada Krishnan or Lim Kok Thay?? Mohd Said is sick in the head.

Remember KJ was [deleted] “brave” in leading the protestors to condeme the USA and Ms. Rice’s visit not long ago near KLCC?

Welcome back! Readers here thought we lost the blog’s only credible legal analyst and Chief Legal Correspondent.

It is a big shame and silly that a Japanese journalist can make accurate accounts to the up-risings and yet our so-called main-stream media were just reporting sh*ts.

So, will history repeat itself, i.e., another bloody event, if current over ambitious leaders in Umno wish to get rid of AAB and his SIL?

These are the types of politicians we have now!

This is a very silly world, a foreign journalist can make accurate accounts on the up-risings and yet our domestic “main-stream” media are reporting nothing but shits!

So whatever excuses Devamoney gives now, is just that. Excuses to cover his faus pax in distancing him from “that type of people”. All the best Devamoney and gang! You can lie all you want now. But what you have said is in the net for all to hear!

For true or otherwise, Devamany already clarified that “Al Jazeera did not allow me to finish my interview” and he was speaking on a mistaken impression initially conveyed to him that the “crowd was unruly and violent”. As to what he said Parliament he could not twist out of that because it would have been recorded in the Hansard.

Nazri’s criticisms of Devamany’s remarks are based on the concept of the Whip – ie party discipline imposed on government MPs to follow the party line and not speak against his party or the government in which that party is part of and represented.

Devamany is likely aware of possible repercussions and has made the calculations.

His role model could be Teluk Kemang MP Sothinathan who questioned the government’s to de-recognise medical degrees from Crimea State Medical University in which the majority of Malaysian students were Malaysian Indians and was suspended for 3 months.

Once in a while it is calculated expedience to score some political points to show that one is willing – unlike the other political enunchs – to fight or speak up for the legitimate grievances of the community one represents and not just enjoy the patronage of the position.

Why, Sothinathan’s offence against Party Discipline was even graver for he was not just an MP as Devamany is but a Deputy Minister of Natural Resources and Environment speaking against the government of which he is a minister.

Today, after the suspension, all is forgotten as long as he “balances” his rhetoric with, for example, challenges to Female Opposition member for a fist-fight to the amusement of his coalition’s comrades! :)

It is a question of how one balances or juggle between commitment to BN’s interest on one hand and a charade of one’s community’s interest on the other – that is the real rock and the hard place – how to make occasional snippets against the hand that feeds you but just so to remind and prove to one’s constituency one’s representativeness of its interest whilst all the while acting this out to serve the ultimate end of shoring up BN’s pretensions in being a multiracial power sharing coalition taking care of all races upon which its acclaimed political legitimacy reposes!

Devamany has also calculated that when any motion is raised by his coalition cohorts to discipline him in Parliament, he can depend on he who criticized him for being a hypocrite earlier would also find himself to be between a rock and a hard place of having, on principle, to defend and speak up for him, as he last did in Sothinathan’s case. :)

You and I got eye problem esp after that Harisonbinhansome’s comment. I spelt Devamaney. His name is Devamany.

If what Devamaney had said in parliament, as reported, is true, I take back my earlier comment about him. However I am a little cautious too, remembering what Sothi used to do before. So, i’ll just wait and see.

What is most scary about all this? What has happened is historical in Malaysia because there have never been a minority group rally before but these so called leaders continue to have a mindset inherited AND further perversed. They exhort others to break new grounds and challenges but themselves stuck with the mentality of ‘getting away with it’ – something their forefathers never intended it to be.

The truth is out there. We have our country being led by people who have bad motives and intentions. This is destroying our nation.

In order to get rid of the Tunku politically, some criminal elements and over ambitious leaders in Umno orchestrated the bloody May 13 Massacre which killed a few hundred Malaysians, maimed a few hundred more other Malaysians, burned down a few hundred shophouses and homes and looted some of them and burned scores of cars and other vehicles. All crimes against humanity.

No inquiry after 38 years. Who says law is law? Why then no rule of law as far as the May 13 Massacre is concerned? Why is this continued rape of law being allowed? In whose interests?

And what about other Umno crimes against humanity like the Memali Massacre in the mid 1980s? When will there be an accounting? Where is the transparency? And where is the much talked about integrity? Including the integrity of the law?