Cool as a cucumber;
Collected and composed;
Clear and concise;
Conscientious and conciliatory.

Bravo, Imtiaz. May the good LORD bless you.

But as for his sincerity and trustworthiness, his integrity on points raised, sense of fair play & democratic values….well, one point sums it all:

“Sham arguments and empty speech do not a saint make!” Oops, I forgot, you are not an ulama nor have the virtuous fibre of one.

One BIG SURPRISE: ZAM was never invited to be on the panel for the interview. He would not have made sense….that…that… that’s for sure!

I watched Nazri tonight on Al JAzeera 101 EAst @ 10.30 pm. All I can do is to confirm that Nazri has ‘dull brains’. Just to quote 2 trademark Nazri comments in response to questions by AlJAzeera anchor:

1) Nazri: “The (Malaysian) newspapers are free to report anything.”
(HA, ha, Nazri, you should have looked at the ghost in your face when you said that!)

2) Nazri: “There is no need for institutional reforms”
(This was in the context of questions related to charges of corruption and the judiciary).
Then, when asked further on wheether there was any validity to the demands for institutional reforms:
Nazri said: ” …to improve, yes.”
Hello Nazri, to improve is an admission of weakness or of systemic rot & therefore, institutional reforms need to be instituted to improve the processes-lah! Aiyah. Minister (of Law?).

Nazri came across on Al JAzeera before an international TV audience as fumbling, fudging, finagling and foraging for answers in his dull cranium! Another bad show for Malaysian Ministers!

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news.php?id=296402

At last, Umno has produced a Chiu Sin Pu Chang.

We have Nazri, the man who calls people “pondans”. We have the ever incoherent Zam. We have tunnel-vision Badruddin. The list goes on.

Is this what the rakyat voted for in the last National Election?

The PM should have given the permit for the BERSIH rally. Afterall, the rakyat was simply asking for free and fair elections. If he did, he would have proven BERSIH organizers wrong, that there was no democracy here. He would have also come out smelling like roses. Instead, the PM saw it as a challenge and ordered a crackdown, with full knowledge that the rakyat was determined to have its say no matter what. By doing so, the PM and his advisors put everyone in harms way.

Now we hear that the Education Ministry wants to send children who were nabbed at the BERSIH peaceful rally for re-education.

Zis must be a God send for Deputy Education Reichsführer Herr Noh Omar. At long last he gets to rehabilitate more people via nude squats. This time its kids.

In der end ve vill haf more rehabilitated but gut and totally obedient youth like zis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2dnJQKu2mI

Seig Heil!

Hope they don’t insult the ZOO

Would the Govt like to inform us if the EC is independent or not ? Using the Govt words “Show proof” otherwise, the EC is NOT INDEPENDENT!!!! and Nazri is right and Najib is wrong, otherwise, Nazri should say sorry to Malaysian for lying in Parliament

What is worrying is Martin Jalleh, by virtue of being a critic and cannot imply the ulterior motive of the likes of Nazri, have to answer his dishonest words and by default fails to deal with the dishonesty itself. If he explore that possibility he puts himself in danger of the overwhelming police power of the government.

In other words, Malaysian are denied the truth by the likes of Nazri and others like disinformation minister Zam as well as many more. And the issue of the EC is about the truth. Everybody knows its filled with fraudulent voters. Who believe the MCA has 1million members? Anyone who is privy to UMNO machinering have heard how easy it is for them to put a thousand fraud votes in any parliamentary constituency.

This is about the truth, but it begins with the truth about the likes of Nazri.

I say let Al-Jazeera get hold of the video of KJ acting like a MONKEY in front of US Embassy and let the world decide if the police hasnt practiced double standards. Let the world decide if KJ’s monkey antics was more peaceful or BErsih’s Nov 10 rally. Maybe Al-Jazeera can interview KJ this time and ask him if his previous antics were acceptable.

No point cursing and swearing at them for they are frothing at their mouths and do not understand simple, succinct logic. Instead, we should all take pity upon these two individuals and pray for their souls so that the father in heaven will forgive them.

Our parliament sounds like ZOO only… With the Oppositions as the animals keepers?

What’s so different between human beings and animals? Well, human thinks and filters. Animals dun even know how to think, how to filter?

No offence. Just for those that are guilty!

So, any ideas or suggestions on how our small number of opposition ministers should reason calmly in cabinet in light of these dogs barking continuously without reason? How does one discuss rationally and calmly, when the ruling government has persistently showed that they are not people of honesty and integrity, as well as having not an iota of intention to change what they already have?

———————

Didn’t the Zam case teach us a very good lesson? The battle doesn’t have to be in Parliament; they think they can be big shots because of the majority and speak like they own the place - but should the video of such a show go out to the people, I’m sure it’ll cause more than just an uproar. We are clearly using the wrong tactics - winning the hearts and minds of the people is more important. The only problem here is distribution … maybe our friends at PAS are willing to help?

Yeah, tell me about it!

To me, it is obvious that the ruling party simply doesn’t want to address the real concerns of rigged election process.

BN prefers to divert the issue by name calling and any means at all. Anything from having to address the charge of rigged elections. Notice how it needs several labels to press one’s hot buttons. To just call “pondan” alone is insufficient. It must be repeated several times, and it must be added with many more cheap shots such as “wires in their heads are severed’, ‘bodoh’, ‘racist’, ‘perkauman’, etc.

And then, it must be delivered with anger and insults. In general, delivered in a manner similar to a mad man infected with rabid. The stronger the emotions, the better, since it makes it more likely to be successful in diverting the issue. One must bark, shout in the heat of one’s arguments, but yet, make sure to open the speech in a calm and respectful manner first. Build the emotions up slowly but carefully, and surely.

And don’t forget to accuse the opposition Ministers of committing illegal acts …. don’t just say it once, say it as many times as possible. And have a few dogs ready to bark in support at the right time. Oh, timing and support by numbers are just so crucial …

Bottom line, all these are diversions. You could say irresponsible behaviour, but bottom line is to avoid discussing and to avoid admitting that the elections are rigged. Notice how they never discussed issues like “phantom voters”, “postal ballots”, how 60%+ voters can result in 91% seats, etc.

So, any ideas or suggestions on how our small number of opposition ministers should reason calmly in cabinet in light of these dogs barking continuously without reason? How does one discuss rationally and calmly, when the ruling government has persistently showed that they are not people of honesty and integrity, as well as having not an iota of intention to change what they already have?

Old Observer

This hardly qualifies as an argument - less still a legal argument. The EC Act may be flawed with lots of loopholes which were taken advantage of by the ruling party all these years. When matters fall between the cracks the BN dominated legislature would pass laws to ‘correct’ those ‘anomalies’ and ensure victories for themselves. That is the abuse of process we are referring to.

But he is right about one thing though i.e. it is unrealistic to expect the BN dominated Parliament to amend any law with amendments going against their interest.

Sadly this touches on the constitutional issue affecting the supremacy of the Constitution vis-a-vis Parliament.

But doesn’t all this make the public protest on 10th November ‘legal’ in the sense that with the supremacy of the Constitution gone the only avenue is to publicly appeal to the Agong who has sworn to protect the Constitution?

Usually we get to read of women being “wired” differently than men so we could understand where the fairer sex is coming from - in an attempt to understand the different perspectives. With this guy Nazri, doesn’t being wired differently make him a ‘pondan’?

If there is no gathering or what so ever, then I believe these act are illegal, and in fact they have commited an offense for launching an early election campaign.

Not to mention their pants when they lose their deposits.

This guy refers to wire “putuihhh” apparently little realizing that it is his wires that have “putuiiih” !

Any takers?

Hi Martin,
You really got the point. Ask Nazri to contest against Anwar!
Oop! The very thought of the contest has made Nazri balls disappear! He is the REAL PONDAN NOW!

The English word eunuch is from the Greek eune (”bed”) and ekhein (”to keep”), effectively “bed keeper.” Servants or slaves were usually castrated in order to make them safer servants of a royal court(Barisan nasional) where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence. Seemingly lowly domestic functions such as making the ruler’s bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter or even relaying messages could in theory give a eunuch “the ruler’s ear” and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant. Similar instances are reflected in the humble origins and etymology of many high offices (e.g. chancellor started out as a servant guarding the entrance to an official’s study). Eunuchs supposedly did not generally have loyalties to the military, the aristocracy, or to a family of their own (having neither offspring nor in-laws, at the very least), and were thus seen as more trustworthy and less interested in establishing a private ‘dynasty’. Because their condition usually lowered their social status, they could also be easily replaced or killed without repercussion. In cultures that had both harems and eunuchs, eunuchs were sometimes used as harem servants (compare the female odalisque) or seraglio guards.

Make your own conclusion- Dedicated to Nazri

bila anak menantu PM buat demonstrasi kat US embassy, ianya lebih 100% buruk dari yang di buat pada nov 10. tapi, water cannon tak keno. pihak polis memang hipokrit dan berat sebelah! tugas kamu, melindungi rakyat, bukan hentam rakyat! lainlah kalau nov 10 tu buat kecoh, tapi sebaliknya, si polis yang buat hal.

40k: Election is not fair! Clean up or else we march!

Bodowi: Don’t challenge me!

+++++++

Khairy: Don’t monkey around ok?

40k: What about you?

Khairy: I got permit so I can monkey around all I want.

+++++++

Hypocrisy much?