In China, a senior official at the Agricultural Bank of China was executed for corruption following years of ordering suppliers to pay him kickbacks. Wen Mengjie, 50, former head of information technology at one of the bank’s Beijing branches, was executed Tuesday for embezzling and taking bribes worth 15 million yuan (USD1.97 million).
In the Philippinnes, former president Joseph Estrada was sentenced to jail in prison after he was found guilty of massive corruption and plundering the country of tens of millions of dollars in tax kickbacks and bribes.
In Japan, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced he would resign after being dogged by a string of damaging scandals that hampered his reform agenda.
What do we have in Malaysia? Another year of shocking revelations of corruption, criminal breach of trust, overspending and mismanagement of funds by the Auditor-General, Tan Sri Amrin Buang — with the apt headline of the the New Straits Times yesterday “Same old story year in year out” – while the culture of impunity reigns on without anyone in high office having to bear responsibility for corruption and abuse of power.
This year the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) has taken a more proactive publicity stance, declaring that it is scrutinizing the Auditor-General’s Report 2006 on spending by the federal and state governments to see if any of the transactions of projects involved corruption.
ACA director-general Datuk Ahmad Said Hamdan said on Tuesday that if there is any hint of corruption, the ACA will haul up the officials concerned, including ministers, for questioning.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, who was also present, said the Prime Minister had instructed all the ministers to look into the AG’s report seriously and to correct whatever that was wrong, and if there were elements of abuse of power and corrupt practice, there was nothing to stop the ACA from investigating and taking action.
These were all empty words utterly lacking in credibility as corruption has worsened in the past four years, as reflected by national and international perceptions, whether by Malaysians (including the former Prime Minister, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad) or by international organizations like the Transparency International in its annual Corruption Perception Index.
Public confidence in the ACA in its independence, capability, professionalism and integrity to fight corruption and to bring the corrupt to book is at an all-time low in the four-year premiership of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, which was why even the officially-endorsed National Integrity Convention held a day before the 2008 Budget presentation last week adopted a resolution unanimously calling for the Anti-Corruption Agency to be made an independent body.
In my speech during the budget debate in Parliament on Monday, I noted a conspicuous omission in the 2008 Budget speech — the total absence of any reference to the scourge of corruption which added to the cost of doing business in Malaysia and a major obstacle to economic efficiency although Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had pledged when he became Prime Minister in October 2003 that eradicating corruption would be his top priority.
In the exchange in Parliament with Barisan Nasional MPs, who claimed that the government was serious in wanting to eradicate corruption, none of them dared to stand up to contradict my prediction despite repeated challenge that Malaysia’s ranking in the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2007, which is expected to be released in a month’s time, is likely to be even worse than the lowest ranking of No. 44 last year and would be approaching No. 50 on the occasion of the nation’s 50th Merdeka anniversary!
When I read that the corrupt banker who was executed in China, Wen Mengjie, had bought three houses in Beijing with the bribes he received, I was reminded of what the former Inspector-General of Police, Tun Hanif Omar had written in his Sunday Star column, that he had been informed by a high-level ACA officer when he was deputy chairman of the Royal Police Commission that 40% of senior police officers could be arrested for corruption without further investigations strictly on the basis of their lifestyles.
It is most deplorable that Barisan Nasional MPs were more interested in “shooting the messenger” instead of focusing on the message when I referred to Hanif’s revelation in Parliament on Monday — with the most irresponsible BN MPs launching a most disgraceful personal attack on Hanif.
I challenge the ACA to prove that it is not a “toothless tiger” and call on the ACA director-general to disclose how many persons had been arrested and prosecuted for corruption and criminal breach of trust from previous Auditor-General’s Reports.

#1 by Jeffrey on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 8:13 am
Ah Pek,
We have the right to cry foul because public office demands that we contain corruption or else there is chaos if every official and leader dip his hand in the pie (State would go bankrupt). But at same time recognise hypocrisy for what it is – no knee jerk measures like capital punishment etc selectively enforced. Singapore (the least corrupt in this part of the world) evinced a political will and has been generally effective to address the issue without resorting to capital punishment. In Singapore, even top Ministers were taken to task – if after a big pay hike, they are corrupt : no selective enforcement. As I earlier said, fair enforcement of the law must go hand in hand with education of all (beginning with young school children) that corruption (unfair advantage) is both legally and morally bad. But for that to be convincing people must believe that reward should justly come from merits and fair competition and not unjustly from other crityeria including power of office. Here is difficult because meritocracy and competition is not an ethos : race, creed etc is (institutionalised and legalised)! The mindset is that being unfairly enriched is an entitlement of office, position, affliliation to power, belonging to right race under the social contract. This kind of mindset has to change. Sporadic enforcement of law will not change it.
Corruption is a natural phenomenon world wide where market economy/capitalism is unbridled and money god worshipped.
China is case in point.In good ole days of China’s revolution, the model Communist cadre pursued the goal of a socialist utopia, work for the good of the party and if corruption was rampant it was corruption of power than money. Since Deng Xiaoping’s push for market economy in 4 Special Economic Zones of the East, the ethos has changed in these places where corruption (in money sense) has been rife with many of them hailing from Guangdong, one of the country’s wealthiest provinces.
China’s response has, at best, been knee jerked.
Another case of corrupt official executed (besides Wen Mengjie) was Duan Yihe, former MP and party chief of Jinan city in the eastern province of Shandong. The problem is the new rich in China from corruption have predilection for mistresses (status symbol), and every one of these would make incessant demands for money so that the other mistresses don’t get so much! In Duan’s case he was so fed up of the mistress money demands that he asked his nephew, Chen Zhi, a Jinan policeman, to help arrange a road accident to eliminate the young woman, Liu Haiping. Chen planted explosives in Miss Liu’s car which detonated by remote control as she drove down a busy road in Jinan on July 9, the blast being so powerful that her Honda sedan was ripped apart, her lower body was destroyed and her torso landed 30 metres away….Now does that not ring a bell here? :)
But application of law has not been constant. Whilst 2 other cases involving Mayor of Shenyang and his deputy were sentenced to death in 2001 for land deals and a former head of the state food and drug agency sentenced to death for taking bribes in 2007, Sun Xiaohong, former director of the People’s High Court of Yunnan, was let off comparatively painlessly by being expelled from the communist party for having pocketed 10 million yuan. The other dramatic case is that of Pang Jiayu, 63, a city mayor and local committee chief in the north-western province of Shaanxi who was also just sacked and expelled from the Communist Party as punishment. Dubbed the “fly-zip mayor”, Pang allegedly used his power and influence to acquire not just money but the wives of his subordinates who had to ‘sacrifice’ their wives for promotion and profit. 11 of his mistresses (some of whose husbands were sentenced to death for graft) ganged up against Pang and produced documentary evidence of his corruption to the State. (Out of 14 most senior officials caught of late for corruption, 12 were due to mistresses spilling the beans!)
Zhou Zhengyi, a Shanghai property tycoon, whose influential political contacts included the former president Ziang Zemin has so far kept the prosecutors at bay. Like here provincial mayors and lower ranking party members have taken the brunt of the tough campaign against graft started by President Hu Jintao.
Don’t hear of any top communist party leaders being taken to task : are we to assume that they are clean? Same situation
as here where the middle bureaucrats are caught by ACA but big fish are let off!
#2 by xaviers on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 8:20 am
investigate investigate… some people will get arrested to show action.
in the end no one gets charged, no one resigns, all’s forgotten …back to normal.
#3 by Irene on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 8:45 am
Ha Ha In Malaysia the ACA, Police and even Court are controled by UMNO. WHere and How are we going to have punishment and justice. They can name thousands of people and investigate them BUT who is going to say YES to punish and sentence them when all the TAIKO of UMNO says NO as those named are actually their cronies. I am very sure ALL Malaysians have the same view as mine.
#4 by undergrad2 on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 10:18 am
“In China, a senior official at the Agricultural Bank of China was executed for corruption …”
“In the Philippinnes, former president Joseph Estrada was sentenced to jail in prison after he was found guilty of massive corruption …”
“In Japan, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced he would resign…”
“What do we have in Malaysia?” asks Leader of the Opposition.
Ali Baba and the 40 thieves??
#5 by AhPek on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 10:33 am
Correction—”…………………………………,we just have to accept that this country miring in corruption is the norm.”
#6 by AhPek on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 10:47 am
“What do we have in Malaysia?” asks YB Lim.
We have UMNOPUTRAS who are entitled to take the choiciest part of the cake leaving the crumbs to the lapdogs to keep them compliant.
#7 by vjvip on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 11:08 am
Finally!!!!!!!
I as a Prime Minister of Malaysia had instructed all the ministers to look into the AG’s report seriously and to correct whatever that was wrong. Semua menteri dan kakitangan kerajaan yang mengambil bahagian telah pun menghantar laporan masing-masing dan saya sendiri telah meneliti semua maklumat tersebut. I feel verry satisfied with their explanation and all of them are never don’t anything wrong. Well Newspaper was misquoted the AG reports wrongly which is i feel verry upset. Maka tolonglah semua media dan juga rakyat Malaysia jangan memperbesarkan-besar hal ini. An I strictly warned all the opposition to not use this issue as their election campaign. Thats it Semuanya sudah Bersih.
#8 by AntiRacialDiscrimination on Friday, 14 September 2007 - 12:01 pm
If the ACA and judiciary are controlled by the corrupt PM, how can we expect the ACA to investigate the PM and bring him to court?
It is a hopeless situation in Malaysia. In fact everybody in UMNO, who supports the PM, is above the law.
#9 by ktteokt on Saturday, 15 September 2007 - 8:34 am
As long as “Separation of Powers” is not practiced, the Malaysian legal system might as well be pronounced dead!! How can the legislature and the executive control the decisions of judges who are supposed to be independent in their judgments? This will definitely lead to biased and unfair judgments being delivered.
Furthermore, can all of you remember the day five high court judges were removed simultaneously? What right has the executive to remove these judges? If we go strictly to the law, it would be utterly difficult to even remove one single sessions court judge but we did it, we removed five high court judges on the same day, without having to consult parliament or the DYMM.
Law in Malaysia is on the rot and if any one thinks that Malaysian law offers protection for Malaysians, forget it! Malaysian law is only meant to offer protection for the elite!
#10 by wtf2 on Sunday, 16 September 2007 - 6:25 pm
normally investigation has a start and proposed end date – just like projects.
Malaysia’s investigations do not, neither do projects appear to have an end date.
long drawn investigations end up being abandoned due to incomplete evidence.
Long drawn projects end up massively overrun because the delivery obligations cannot be met
So will ACA investigate till the next AG report comes out?