Ketuanan Melayu – are students taught that this is mere history which contradicts Bangsa Malaysia and Vision 2020?


History students must be taught that “Ketuanan Melayu”is a concept pertaining to a past historical era but not pertinent to Malaysia of today as it contradicts the Bangsa Malaysia concept of Vision 2020

Parliament has set up the Select Committee on unity and national service to grapple with difficult and hard issues pertaining to national unity and nation-building.

The task and challenge of the Select Committee is to wrestle with these great issues and give its considered recommendations “and not just transmit the government’s stand or views.

I find that on many issues raised by those who attended the public hearings of the Select Committee, the Select Committee took the easy way out by responding either with “take note” (ambil maklum) or “acknowledges comment” (memperakui ulasan) based on the relevant Ministries’ official replies.

This is utterly useless as this is not the role for which the Select Committee had been set up by Parliament and it should not shirk from its duty to take a stand on the issues pertaining to national unity and integration which had been brought to its attention.

Let me give one illustration.

I refer to the submission by the DAP Secretary-General Lim Guan Eng to the Select Committee on 29th April 2005 on education . The topic, as noted in page 88 of the report, is to “eliminate racist concepts” in Form 3 and Form 5 history textbooks which dwelt on the concept of “Ketuanan Melayu”.

The explanation from the Education Ministry is as follows:

Istilah “Ketuanan Melayu” perlu dilihat dalam konteks perjuangan orang Melayu sebelum merdeka yang menganggap Semenenjung Tanah Melayu sebagai tanah pusaka (sons of the soil) seperti yang diakui oleh pihak penjajah British ketika itu. Istilah ini juga merujuk kepada situasi sebelum merdeka yang menjelaskan reaksi orang Melayu terhadap penubuhan Malayan Union yang telah menghapuskan “Ketuanan Melayu” dari segi kedaulatan, kuasa politik dan isu kewarganegaraan yang longgar. “Ketuanan Melayu” dilaungkan oleh pemimpin Melayu pada ketika itu bagi menyatupadukan orang Melayu menentang Malayan Union dan bukannya menuntut kemerdekaan. Oleh itu, konsep ini ialah peristiwa dan reality sejarah pada ketika itu dan ia dimasukkan bukan bertujuan untuk menggugat perpaduan masyarakat Malaysia.

What is the Select Committee’s position? An insipid position of “”Jawatankuasa memperakui ulasan Kementerian”. This is totally unsatisfactory.

The question is whether history students in schools are clearly told that the concept of “Ketuanan Melayu” is a concept pertaining to a past historical era but not pertinent to Malaysia of today as it contradicts with the Bangsa Malaysia concept of Vision 2020, and if not, what is being done to give the new generation of Malaysia a correct picture and true perspective on nation-building.

This is what I look forward to in the final report of the Select Committee.

(Speech 3 by in the debate on the interim report of the Parliamentary Select Committee on unity and national service in Dewan Rakyat on Thursday, 10th May 2007 at 9.15 pm)

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by sotong on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 9:31 am

    ” Keutamaan Malayu/Bumi ” as opposed to ” Ketuanan Melayu ” is important to protect the unique culture and traditions of the country.

    As the same time, the great sacrifices and contributions by non Malays/bumi to a modern and progressive country must be properly recognised and fully appreciated and accepted by Malays/bumi.

  2. #2 by blastmeister on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 11:31 am

    From the history that I learned, all three major races are immigrant, the only Bumiputra I recognised are the Orang Asli in both Peninsula Malaysia and Sabah & Sarawak. How about that?

    Malay? Look at the history of Malacca (that’s where the Malay always said their history begin) – so-called Malay are descendant of Javanese, Sumatrans, Acheh, Bugis and etc which are from the Malay Archipelago which is part of Austronesia. Of course, we all know the Malaysia Chinese and Indians are from China and India respectively.

    Why on earth some people claim things that is not beling to them? Isn’t this also another day light robbery? Put aside the Chinses/Indians/Malays contributions and their over-stayed in Peninisula. Did the Malay share their wealth with the REAL bumiputra? NO! Will the real Bumiputra stand up?

  3. #3 by Jimm on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 12:28 pm

    Don’t get pissed off by an individual remarks here. He only trying to get everyone ‘work up and out’ here. The sharing only reflects his/her understanding. That’s why we are all here to make sure that enough truth and healthy sharing can be develop and growth to overcome those negatives.

  4. #4 by Jimm on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 12:33 pm

    We are all still Malaysian to the eyes of the world. Most of us sharing here are truly Malaysia Malaysian and we all know that.
    The point of seeking truth and changes lies in each of us that have seen enough of things around us. We need that the changes have to come sooner than we can all prayed for. However, our own mindset haveto be very ‘clear’ to embrace the changes. We must speak of the new language of Malaysian and cultivate the new Malaysian culture now, first.
    Don’t let any negative elements drives us off the track from our original Malaysian Malaysia vision.

  5. #5 by Jimm on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 12:36 pm

    Keep all positives sharing going among us. There will be ‘evil’ forces to try to ‘shoot’ us at our own feets. Don’t bother … they are just minor whenever we all can stay in the positive zones .. Keep it up.

  6. #6 by megaman on Monday, 14 May 2007 - 12:49 pm

    it’s a very simple to question…

    As a Malay,

    a) do you want your race to have 100% supremacy in a backward n corrupt Msia … to reign in hell …

    b) or to be a part of multi-race and multi-cultural forward looking progressive Msia but your race just having a part of this rather than everything … to serve in heaven …

    for the top few … I think it’s option A but for the majority down the hierarchy … it’s very clear which one is better …
    If only the majority of the Malays can see what’s wrong …
    Kuman di seberang lautan jelas terlihat, gajah di depan mata tak nampak …

  7. #7 by BobSam on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 - 6:36 pm

    blastmeister,
    Who do you think Parameswara was? Historians trace him as a “naughty” Indonesian prince of Keralite (Southern Indian – so he would have been dark skinned – according to JJ – low caste) descent who ran away from home. Got in trouble with the Rajah in Temasek, and ran north. He stopped under the Melaka tree for shade and saw this beautiful creature (Mousedeer – I think) and named the place Melaka and started his Kingdom there. He later converted from a Hindu and became a Moslem.

  8. #8 by BobSam on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 - 6:57 pm

    Before Parameswara of Melaka, there were the Cholas of Kedah around 200/300 AD, until 1300, look up Wiki for more info on them.

  9. #9 by BobSam on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 - 7:04 pm

    Now that you have done that, tell me who were the 1st settlers on this Peninsular.

    By the way, go north to Cambodia, Thailand, and east to Southern Philippines, and see whether there are any similarities among the people. Dont listen to their language, just look at the people. Tell me these offspring of the Indian & Chinese people look similar dont they?
    The Indians & Chinese met in IndoChina, and their offspring are found there. They then migrated southward.
    So this beautiful land is being settled by the original settlers & their ancestors. So lets learn about the past, but live in the present with the future in mind.
    Boleh? Sure boleh, we are Malaysians!

  10. #10 by ktteokt on Thursday, 17 May 2007 - 5:15 pm

    What is the use of having just a vision when nobody works towards achieving its goals? It might as well be termed as a mirage.

    Having proclaimed Vision 2020, it has resulted in many adverse effects as many of our privileged friends think this will be a miracle, getting what they want without putting in any efforts.

    We have been independent for half a century already and look what has happened to Malaysia? Given the next 13 years to Vision 2020, do you think we can achieve what was laid down in this great vision? The Malaysia Boleh concept has brought about the worst effects on our privileged friends. What do you think Malaysia Boleh? The way things are going, the only thing that Malaysia Boleh is “Mati”.

  11. #11 by accountability on Friday, 18 May 2007 - 7:20 pm

    how dare these bunch of racist malay-supremacist twist historical facts to brainwash our children??!

  12. #12 by akmal on Thursday, 7 May 2009 - 11:41 am

    hmmmm….bangsa…penting?mungkin…yang paling penting?agama?harta?terpulang..bagi aku agama…jujur…aku marah gak baca komen2 nie..tp try rasional..depa kata betul dari pandangan depa..kita dari pandangan kita…yang penting skali…saling hormat..yang aku nampak sekarang langsung x dak hormat antara satu sama lain…cina..melayu…manusia jugak apa..

Comments are closed.